Transport Canada to implement speed limiting device
In an effort to thwart habitual speeding, Transport Canada has developed a new system that can make exceeding posted limits difficult or impossible. The device utilizes GPS and a speed limit map coupled with technology that caps a vehicle's top speed based on the legal speed of the road being traveled. Once the vehicle arrives at the predetermined speed limit, the device makes it very difficult to go any faster. For now, Canada is looking to slap this stingy speed governor on the vehicles of perpetual speeders and reckless drivers, but the technology could one day be used for all drivers. Lovely. Luckily for drivers here in the States, a strict speed limit governor is just un-American, and legislators know it would be
[Source: Winding Road]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Jack Goodwin 5:36PM (2/09/2008)
There is absolutely no way this device can be considered a good idea. While excessive speeding is bad, installing a device that limits a driver's control over their vehicle is a terrible way of addressing the problem and is just plain unsafe.
Reply
Judy Zik 5:19PM (2/10/2008)
This story is bunk and Autoblog should be ashamed.
It's like the old game of telephone. Winding Road twisted it a bit and Autoblog twists it even farther. The actual story said that they were testing a system that could allow them to do something like this. Wow. Big news. All kinds of big brother systems being tested in the states too. Nobody has passed any laws allowing this crap in Canada or the states yet. Besides this is Transport Canada testing a device. They don't even do traffic law or vehicle license enforcement here in Canada. That falls to the individual provinces transportation departments.
Cue all the Canada bashers who are gonna fall for this crap and point to it as further proof that Canada is an evil socialist nation.
Dan 5:42PM (2/09/2008)
^ Yup, there's no way that this will ever be a mandatory device on vehicles.
If the government REALLY wanted to crack down on speeders, they would give the Police forces more funds for recruitment and policing vehicles. In my community south of Toronto, there is only 3 police cruisers for 3 towns.
Reply
JunkStory 5:49PM (2/09/2008)
Laws like these only last for a short time.
Another government party which vows to destroy this new law will win election next time.
Reply
Pat 5:52PM (2/09/2008)
The Québec government recently passed (or at at least attempted, I can't remember) a bill to electronically limit the speed of big rigs to 105 km/h.
Hopefully by the time this thing becomes mainstream, self-driving cars will be around to take away the pain or humiliation.
Reply
Talisman 6:03PM (2/09/2008)
What a terrible idea. Ive definitely had a situation or two where ive had to temporarily speed to get away from crazy road rage drivers trying to run me off the road.
Also, what if you are in the situation where you must rush someone to the hospital?
Oh well. Im glad I dont live in Canada.
Reply
Reader 6:05PM (2/09/2008)
The USA's hat is going Orwellian on us, how sad.
Reply
Dolemite 8:24PM (2/09/2008)
"going Orwellian"?
Heh. I am assuming you have never heard of Pierre Trudeau.
Shaun 6:07PM (2/09/2008)
Whats south of Toronto.... Lake Ontario? Not many speeders there! Or Toronto Island.... I'm in Burlington, and there seems to be plenty of officers around these parts... I'm not saying this is a good idea. Especially in Toronto. As well as on most Major Freeways.
Reply
C'est Raoul 6:13PM (2/09/2008)
I think it's great, except that's not really useful in Canada.
I have thinking about such a device, especially for Europe. For those familiar to Europe, driving overthere is a mess. Speed limits change every 100 yards. It's really hard to stick to it, and pricey if you don't do it now. I would pay to have that to drive in Europe. But I'd like to be able to turn it off for highway cruising. And overtaking too. (I think it allows you to speed up for a short time and like a 10% over speed limit).
In Canada, I think it's pretty useless, except maybe for bad drivers (as usual, there is a good justification for implementing such devices before generalizing it).
On the end, I would not mind a GPS system that bill drivers for their road usage. The more you drive, the more you pay. Same for insurance. Does not have to be through GPS though. GPS and bidirectional communication will be more common, and of great use for congestion, etc. Will be more and more common. Individual freedom won't mix well with those systems (car to car communication, computer driver, car trains etc.)
Reply
olddavid 6:10PM (2/09/2008)
The PC's in the current government would probably find this anathema to their Alberta-based smaller government philosophy. I used to live in the Lake BonaVista neighborhood, and consequently, I have a small amount of insight into how these guys think. Methinks Transport Canada will find a budgetary crisis in their near future, making implementation of this draconian device moot. This even finding usage in the big rigs is unsettling, but almost everything that comes from the White House and the so-called "Patriot Act" is equally surreal, so who knows what our "protectors" will come up with next? My dual citizenship was once my ace in the hole, but actions like this make me wonder what direction my home country is going. But, long -term, the approach to governing of the Canadians is far superior to the greed-based corporate domination of America, so I would still bet on their common sense to prevail in the end.
Reply
ZeeHK 9:18PM (2/09/2008)
This is nonsense for cryin out loud!!!
I would seriously consider about moving to another country if this was the case. Limiting how I drive??? Comon now, they just have to face the facts that it's not speeders only that make the roads unsafe, I'm not saying that speeders don't have a part, but comon limiting my speed that's nasty. + I think Canadian highway speeds are just too low @ 100, the avg highway speed tends to be arnd 120km/h. Honestly speaking.
Reply
Eliot 9:34PM (2/09/2008)
I have many times had to speed up to avoid an accident. People forget this is a tool for safety just as much as brakes are.
Also, as vehicles have gotten safer, many speed limits have become antiquated (even though supposedly they are checked).
However, I would be happy to sign up for a system that informed me of the speed limit, and even made my speedometer glow yellow at the speed limit, orange 5 mph above, and red 10 mph above. then I could make an informed decision, and I imagine I would be less likely to speed.
Reply
Bert 6:39PM (2/09/2008)
But the speed limit is 100Kph! Why would they limit the top speed to 105??? Because they are a bunch of idiots. Des idiots je dis! Pis la limo de la ministre se fait poigné a 130+ Voyons donc mon Bob. Qu'ils se servent donc de leur têtes!
Reply
integradude 6:41PM (2/09/2008)
This is the second stupid law that the canadian government has attempted to impliment to reduce speeding. Does the goverment understand that speeding does not cause accidents inexpierence does and in most cases going 140 on the hwy does not cause any problems, look at the autobauhns in gemrmany. The government has got to end these stop gap messure and instead go to the route of the problem and impliment stricter driver training.
Reply
frrferyt 6:47PM (2/09/2008)
Why canada sucks! The sad part is you know its coming to the states, some dumb liberal in cali will smell the stink of this a propose it. I cannot express hw stupid this is, unbelievable and the canadian people just bend over and take it. This why laws exist. You break the law, you pay. We don't need big brother to babysit us, although as more laws get passed I can see why they think we do. People are getting more stupid by the minute.
Reply
Jacob 6:47PM (2/09/2008)
I don't understand why some governments are so jealous to enforce their speeding laws. What's the percentage of traffic fatalities that result specifically from speeding? I suspect it's a pretty low number.
Reply
Joshua 6:52PM (2/09/2008)
BS. This is just complete BS. Winding Road is crap, utter crap. - Okay maybe I've been listening to too much of the Ricky Gervais show... But the point remains, as a rational human being I cannot trust Winding Road as the sole source for such a monumentally unlikely piece of news.
These are the guys who fabricated a ZR1 story and intentionally conned readers and reporters. They have no credibility. Winding Road is car porn, nothing more.
Reply
Gardiner Westbound 7:03PM (2/09/2008)
The Ontario politburo will shortly introduce legislation requiring large truck speed governors be set at 65 mph while traveling provincial highways.
Reply
adam 7:15PM (2/09/2008)
A device like this is stupid and costly, with little or no possible revenue from implementation.
I've always hated toll-ways because they are a hazardous and inefficient way of generating revenue on a roadway. However, why not hit two birds with one stone here?
Implement a toll-way system that monitors speed: Add a ticket/card issuing machine at each highway on-ramp that digitally stamps location and time. At each exit, implement a card/ticket reading machine or occupied booth that reads the card/ticket and charges by distance traveled (if a toll is needed...). At the same time, a charge or citation can be issued if the motorist was speeding (easy calculation - divide distance by time to find average speed). Of course, a threshold would be necessary, but that's not hard to implement.
Do I like the idea? No, I can't stand tolls, but if states like Illinois and others insist on a toll-way, why not make the system more efficient and at the same time, cut down on high-way patrol officers needed to issue silly citations for speeding? It seems like this idea would work for not only Canada's habitual speeders, but the entire speeding population.
Reply