<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, I agree with you completely. The SL never really seemed "right" - kind of never had a really "strong" and "balanced" look to it like BMW does with almost all of their models, even the polarizing 6-series. <br><br>This years, while certainly more aggressive, DEFINITELY does not really "fit" together. In addition, and quite frankly, the back end is getting quite dated. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paul34]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 1:59AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>