<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not pretty?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mcheddadi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 1:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone else ever thought the styling of the SL has always kind of been "off." The front and rear just don't work together especially with a hard top.<br><br>Or maybe I'm just nuts.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Vrana]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 1:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, I agree with you completely. The SL never really seemed "right" - kind of never had a really "strong" and "balanced" look to it like BMW does with almost all of their models, even the polarizing 6-series. <br><br>This years, while certainly more aggressive, DEFINITELY does not really "fit" together. In addition, and quite frankly, the back end is getting quite dated. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paul34]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 1:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[Though this isn't ABGreen, it would be fun (not) to see what kind of CO2 output these [fugly] beasts have.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[finbred]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is the Mercedes equivalent of the Acura RL redesign.  It's uglier than before ... and looks like a cheapo design.  The 3 spoke steering wheel is really ugly.  Bring back Bauhaus!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not only is it ugly but according to recent testing on Top Gear, it's a hand full to drive because it brakes traction too easily; tires? <br><br>I wouldlove to have this trouble with my 240Z track car!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anybody catch this part?<br><br>"Each forged connecting rod is precisely "cracked" with the help of a laser beam, so the irregular fracture contributes to its strength when the two halves are clamped around the crankshaft."<br><br>Sounds odd.  Oh, and I'm with all of you on the looks - to be honest, I much prefer the current look]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[porschedevotee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[Better in AMG trim, but still can't be a fan.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RLQ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[Finally a Mercedes with a sporty transmission, hopefully it trickles down to the normal models as well. I love the increase in power even though the supercharger is disbanded. Beautiful work]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pmiddle5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 3:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA["The SL63 AMG is powered by an AMG 6.3-liter V8 engine"<br><br>Is it? I always thought the AMG V8 was a 6.2.<br><br>What kind of weirdo gearbox is that? "Multi-Clutch"? Is it just the planetary gearsets of the 7G-Tronic with a wet clutch instead of the torque converter?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mirko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 3:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[technically it is a lot closer to 6.2 than 6.3, but mercedes rounds it up to 6.3 regardless so that it can bring back memories of a winning race engine from one of their old cars or something.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[madgamer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 1:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[@porschedevotee<br>This is actually what every BMW M engine since the early 90s is made like.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mirko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 3:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's pretty hard to improve on the iconic looks of the previous generation SL (1989 - 2002).  <br><br>Even with this latest refresh, the car still doesn't live up to the high design standards of previous generations.  However, the engines are pretty amazing (604 HP and and 738 lb-ft of twist!!!).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tool]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 3:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[POWER!!! but that's about it... I really, and I mean REALLY hate the new front lights (WTF???) and the rest ain't too pretty either, and does it handle?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobius_1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 3:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[Only 700+ ft/lbs of torque?  Darn, I was hoping it'd be enough to tow the Sun into the Earth, instead of just the Moon.  What a major letdown.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MachinaDC5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 3:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[That interior is great as mercedes usual. The exterior is kind of bland now days thought.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[giallo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 6:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks over decorated .]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 7:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[I dunno what car you guys are seeing but it looks utterly fabulous to me.<br><br>And frankly, some ridiculous power on tap there.<br><br>Would take an SL AMG over an SLR in a heartbeat.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat NCN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 7:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's officially official alright....the car has lost it's edge in the styling department. Saving my cash for a 'previously owned' 04-06. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DCragtop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 7:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/officially-official-mercedes-benz-unveils-2009-sl63-and-sl65-am/</guid><description><![CDATA[now if BMW can get this much power in their cars, we could have a ton more fun  - they handle excelent adn they would have tons of power as well<br><br>MB knows how to get power in their engines, but handing hasn't been their thing <br><br>the front headlights are just plain weird ugly, seems liek they barely changed anything else<br><br>overall a let down, when is this car due for a redesign]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ligor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 8:48AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>