<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too bad. But I'd take a ZR1 anyway.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Torrent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[I dont deny it's performance, but 95% of people dont even glance when a 'vett rolls by, no matter what trim is it. A viper, on the other hand, will turn just about everyone's head. It is truely a one-of-a-kind, striking, jaw-dropping, fantastic machine, and there just isnt another car that can replace it, especially at the price. it truely is an affordable supercar.<br><br>A truely sad day in automotive history. It will be missed. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TwinTurbo3000GT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 11:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think I'll be sad to see it go.  It has been a good run, but it never seemed to get its act together.  It had incredible brute strength, but other things were lacking; in earlier models it didn't do corners all that well, and in recent years, the driving position stunk and the interior materials and design were not worth paying 80K for.  A kick to drive, yes.  A car to own or live with, meh.  I can see where they're coming from on this cut.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[srDRIVEN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[if chrysler has some excellent products for sale by the time 2011 rolls around, the loss of the viper is forgivable<br><br>if they are counting on the new chinese fwd demon to satisfy the sportscar enthusiasts, then i am afraid that cerberus has already lost every penny they have sunk into a dead brand]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[naggs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[The car gods surely frown on such behavior, and Cerberus can only watch as Chrysler dies a slow and painful death.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Seoultrain]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sad to see it go, especially since chrysler does make money on every viper sold...not much, but hey its better than most companies who lose money on their Halo cars.<br><br>I still think the platform should still be around, with 6.1L hemi and reskined as the chrysler firepower concept from a couple years back. Could lower prices to more reasonable 60g range and since it would be based on existing viper chassis cost could also be held in check.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Insiderunknown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cerberus should be killing the mainstream garbage that's sinking the company, not the cars people actually want to buy from it. <br><br>Halo vehicles are good for brand image and create enthusiasm for the company like the Viper.  What would GM be without the Corvette? <br><br>They should be killing the Compass, Patriot, and Commander.  They should have redesigned the Pacifica (the original crossover) instead of bringing out the crappy-looking and half-baked Journey.  <br><br>Some of the product cuts they're making really make no sense.<br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TriShield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hate to see this car go away, but it's like you said, the car represents what a company can do when it's firing on all cylinders. <br><br>Clearly Chrysler is pretty far from that right now so why not roll up the designs and come back strong later?<br><br>Just because it's gone now doesn't mean it's gone forever. Ask a Camaro buyer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[But, if there are any V10 powertrains leftover please make a Challenger SRT10.<br><br>Thanks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TriShield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[How much of this is driven by the new CAFE standards?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JayP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not much.  The Viper is only a very small percentage of Chrysler's annual fleet sales.<br><br>This is going away because it's not cost-effective, especially in light of the redesign costs needed to beat the ZR-1 and it's successors.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[psarhjinian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 5:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[well....it's too bad to see it going...<br><br>because Cerbrus are WRONG about it...<br><br>when the viper first came out , it was the answer the 911.<br><br>but now it's the corvettes turn to do that . The Viper is now just an American Icon . And Cerbrus should respect that . One of the main reasons why they're cutting it off is becuase "HEALTH AND SAFETY" and ofcouse "GLOBAL WARMING"....i'll bet that we wont see the 8.3 V10 forever!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeyad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[What?  The viper was NEVER the answer to a 911.  The viper was a throwback to old time muscle cars, the Porche a track bred machine.  They are two completely different cars.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 10th 2008 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[None, viper sells in such low volume it has nearly no effect on cafe..especially when you consider how truck dependant chrysler is...the viper alone will do nothing towards cafe]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Insiderunknown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sometimes death begets legends. And they are NOT getting rich on the Viper]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FThorn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[A much as I can appreciate the Viper, I'm glad.<br><br>Now I have no reason to even consider buying a Chrysler, ever.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Vello]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA["Cerberus should be killing the mainstream garbage that's sinking the company, not the cars people actually want to buy from it."<br><br>You hit it on the head. People WANT to buy it, but not too many actually do.<br><br>What would you do it you were a failing car company? Concentrate on the mainstream cars that alot of people buy and make you money, or the niche cars that cost alot of money to produce, but don't sell in enough volume to make you money?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Benfolio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll bet most people don't even know the Viper has made it this far.  It's just not on anyone's radar anymore.  I hate to see it go, but it's time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MyCarProjects.net]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[True, but there's no question that the Vette actually makes GM a good amount of money. It sells. <br><br>The Viper, on the other hand.... ehh. Really the only people that buy them are hardcore Viper enthusiasts. It's hard to describe, but not "everyone and their grandma" woudl buy a Viper, while most people would probably buy a Vette of some sort. <br><br>And yes, it never really did get its act together. Whereas GM is building some incredible world-class supervehicles (ZR1), Dodge still is sticking with embarrasing interiors, gigantic engines that honestly, should be making more power for their displacement, and cars that still have a little trouble going around a corner properly. <br><br>I can appreciate what the Viper stood for - a pure insane metal sled, and NOTHING else - but come on. Unless we're building an Ariel Atom here, one is almost obligated to make everything about the car high quality and at least a little classy - and finished looking. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paul34]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/08/has-cerberus-killed-the-viper/</guid><description><![CDATA[mabye it will come back in the future just like the old musclecars<br>this is the iconic car from modern era chrysler]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hike15]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2008 2:53PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>