Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.













Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadChicago 2008: Mitsubishi shows off 2009 Eclipses
(Page 1 of 1)
Mr. Oak @ Feb 7th 2008 12:18PM
Nice, I think. Don't know what it is, but Mitsubishis just never seems to measure up. Here is my point. If Toyota or Honda made this exact car, it would sell better, and have a better resale value once you tire of it.
Before any of you bare your fangs, there is some history here.
The Starion, was a kickass car, but resale was crap. I know, I took in a couple of TSi Starions on trades for Turbo Supras. Sellers lost their shorts on those cars.
The original Diamante same thing. That was a georgeous car in its day. Big hits at trade-in.
The 3000 did somewhat better, but not when compared to the Supra, 300 ZX and RX-7.
Even the Galant (not the current gen ugly duckling) were very nice cars that the owners took a bath on at trade in time. I know some who had to hang on to the cars, because they lost so much value.
Can't speak on the EVOs never really had anything to do with them.
Mind you, I never said that they were bad cars. They just seem to get no respect at trade-in