New York developer Vincent Polimeni wants to connect Long Island and Westchester County with a 16-mile tunnel running between Oyster Bay and Rye under the Long Island Sound. His plan calls for the estimated $10 billion dollar project to be privately funded, with advertising and $25 tolls in each direction recovering the development costs once the tunnel opens. If ultimately approved and completed, it would consist of two 3-lane tubes plus a center maintenance/emergency access tunnel. While Oyster Bay's town supervisor, who initially called the idea "unrealistic," is waiting to see more information before passing final judgement, Westchester County officials are very opposed to the project, saying that it would transform existing traffic conditions from merely bad to completely unmanageable. Realistically, it's very hard to see this ever getting past the discussion stage, even though the idea's an interesting one. Currently, there's a ferry service between Port Jefferson, Long Island and Bridgeport, CT, where passengers can then jump on I-95 (and sit in that traffic) or transfer to commuter rail into NYC.
UPDATE: Toll Roads News has a more detailed feature than the AP report we found initially. It includes more information about the exact tunnel route, etc. The official website for the project, dubbed the Cross Sound Link, can be found here.
[Source: AP]
Spy Shots II: Jaguar XF-R
Officially Official (almost): Audi TT clubsport quattro
Subaru releases Impreza WRC2008 ahead of launch at Acropolis rally
Subaru releases Exiga teaser
REPORT: Production-trim Chevy Volt to be shown in Paris
Autoblog Podcast #94
Hiroshi Tamura gives us closer look at 2009 Nissan Maxima
In the Autoblog Garage: Harley-Davidson Night Rod Special
In The Autoblog Garage: Suzuki XL7
First Drive: 2009 Ford Escapes, more of almost everything
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Corey W. @ Jan 31st 2008 9:45AM
$25 dollars?!?!? H - E - Double Hockey Sticks No!!
It will never happen... but that just my baseless opinion. :-)
J M C 3 @ Jan 31st 2008 9:56AM
If your sending a truck from connecticut to LI it's only $ 20 more than the Throgs Neck Bridge which can be a 2 hr plus difference depending on traffic.By comparison ,the tunnel would be 15 min.Perfect sense when you're running a truck with a driver.
icu812ru469 @ Jan 31st 2008 9:46AM
16 mile tunnel? What happens when a car catches fire, an multi-car accident occurs that blocks all lanes? How big is this emergency middle tunnel going to be? I just see a 16 mile long tunnel as being a big risk for motorists.
Alex @ Jan 31st 2008 10:08AM
The Chunnel is 31 miles long, granted it's a rail line but it still carries similar risks. I would assume that it would not be three open lanes of travel, but more like three restricted lanes, i.e. you enter in lane 1; you can't merge into lane 2 or 3 unless there is an accident in lane 1. The emergency middle tunnel will likely be large enough to carry all sorts of emergency vehicles and construction equipment.
It'll require tons of safety, security, and traffic management systems to work efficiently. It will be well worth the $25 price of admission, especially considering it'll likely cut travel time by hours.
The project will be a tough sell to the residents of both Rye and Oyster Bay. Both of which are affluent areas.
sk @ Jan 31st 2008 10:18AM
There are enough of other tunnels around the world that are longer than this one. For example take a look at the Gotthard Tunnel in Switzerland which is 35miles / 54km long.
rail road http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotthard_Base_Tunnel
road http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotthard_Road_Tunnel
tankd0g @ Jan 31st 2008 11:15AM
Tunnels for cars have been death traps but lessons learned from past disasters (should) make new tunnels safer than ever before. $10 billion seems pretty optumistic for something like that.
rgseidl @ Jan 31st 2008 3:22PM
I can't comment on whether the proposed link is desirable or not but in engineering terms, it's a non-starter. Digging tunnels big enough for three lanes side-by-side would be hugely expensive. Moreover, ensuring sufficient ventilation 8 miles from shore would be very difficult if it's full of cars with ICEs.
There' a reason the Channel Tunnel features a train that transports cars.
Henry Rosenberg @ Jan 31st 2008 9:51AM
Oyster Bay is a pretty upscale place. Wikipedia says: "According to a 2006 estimate, the median income for a household in the town was $97,934, and the median income for a family was $109,478." How likely is it that they'll want all that traffic?
J M C 3 @ Jan 31st 2008 9:51AM
It's time for a visionary public works project for the greater NY area.It's been too long.The last one we had ,I think ,was the Verrazano Narrows bridge.This short cut would help a great deal with truck traffic especially at the Throgs Neck/Whitestone bottleneck and go a long way to curb pollution and increase productivity.
Travis @ Jan 31st 2008 10:32AM
I still think that there should be a tunnel from the Port Jeff to Bridgeport. The Ferry is expensive (~$50/way) and takes forever (almost 2 hours) so it doesn't save any time over driving around. I used to work in Islandia, and going to CT/Boston was a HUGE pain. That i would've paid a $25 toll for, especially to avoid the Throgs Neck/Whitestone bridges. This seems too close to those, and really would only be a sort of overflow valve during the summer months when all the hamptons traffic is backed up for miles and miles...
J M C 3 @ Jan 31st 2008 10:06AM
It's not visable on the map,but 287 traverses westchester and crosses the Hudson at the Tappan zee bridge cutting more time from travel.as it makes a trip from Nyack to Syosset a straight run.I think that's brilliant.It just saves so much time and gas.
David(Postal) @ Jan 31st 2008 9:54AM
Sorry I don't think this is going to happen nor do I think the time saved is worth the extra toll cost.
robert bell @ Jan 31st 2008 10:08AM
OK, such a tunnel wouldn't be without risks and problems to overcome, but from a purely pragmatic standpoint this makes a lot of sense if the goal is to alleviate traffic near and into/around metro NYC.. Given the population density of the NYC market and the inability to expand existing freeways, anything which might alleviate the congestion into and out of the NYC and Jersey area would be helpful. On the other hand, spending ten billion dollars to encourage more vehicular traffic in the metro area would not be as wise as a like amount invested in some form of mass transit
The Port Authority has discussed, for years, the need for an expansion of the Lincoln and/or Holland tunnels to handle increased rail lines into the city from Jersey but they have reisisted proposals to increase vehicle traffic; instead, they are now discussing a variation on the London scheme to charge cars for entering certain areas of Manhattan; a new form of user tax based on how much congestion you create and how much pollution is attributable to your car.
Bottom line: this scheme is fraught with all sorts of public policy issues and is not simply a matter of whether or not it could be built. Given the bureacracies in the metro NY area and the dueling agendas of politicians this ain't likely to happen.
Chris @ Jan 31st 2008 10:15AM
So, I guess the shortest distance between two points is not a straight line anymore?
300Kid @ Jan 31st 2008 2:16PM
That's the current path of travel, the tunnel would connect A & B in a straight line. And btw, as someone who travels to LI frequently, I think it's a great idea.
Chris @ Jan 31st 2008 3:06PM
Yeah, that's what I realized AFTER I posted that comment. Sorry.
FThorn @ Jan 31st 2008 10:16AM
Instead of building up congested, costly places, just move to part of USAmerica that has tons of cheap, open spaces? Room to breath is also refreshing. Preowned homes from $20,000-40,000 or so and new construction from $90,000 also makes it more affordable for folks to LIVE, too. But, hey, if that's what you want; or it's your security blanket (being around more strangers) go for it.
MC @ Jan 31st 2008 1:21PM
Yes, and then you can make $25K instead of $125K also.
Saluki @ Jan 31st 2008 10:17AM
The only reason the politicians are opposed is because it would be a private project. That means it would most likely come in on time and at or below budget. This would also prevent them from handing out the construction contracts to their "connected" friends.
jim @ Jan 31st 2008 10:18AM
$25 is cheap and it would be worth it a 2x that, not for the casual driver but for drivers going between CT & LI on business the time savings alone makes it worth it. The ferry for a car and driver is about $45.