2008 Dodge Challenger already up on fueleconomy.gov
click above for more pics of the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8
With all of the spy shots, leaked covers and embargoed images of the 2008 Dodge Challenger on the web already, we're not sure how Chrysler feels about any more information getting out on its modern muscle car. Some information, however, is public access, like fuel economy ratings and other specs that are posted by the EPA on its website, fueleconomy.gov. The 2008 Dodge Challenger has already been added to the site and is reported to get 13 mpg city and 18 mpg on the highway. Since the 2008 MY Challenger will be just the SRT8 model with the five-speed automatic, these figures are for the familiar 6.1L HEMI V8 used in other SRT products like the Dodge Charger SRT8 and Chrysler 300 SRT8, both of which also achieve the same fuel economy numbers. According to the EPA, driving the Challenger SRT8 a distance of 25 miles will cost you around $5.50, and you'll be spending around $3,302 per year on gas.
The fueleconomy.gov page for the 2008 Dodge Challenger also reveals that its interior volume will be 94 cubic feet and that the trunk will swallow 16 cubic feet of air. Just for comparison's sake, the 2007 Ford Mustang has 85 cubic feet of space in its passenger compartment and 13 cubic feet in the trunk. If you're on the fence about these two pony cars, this information might make a difference. Thanks for the tip, Mohamed!
[Source: fueleconomy.gov]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Andrew 12:37PM (1/25/2008)
$3,302 if you drive 15,000 miles a year. I drive more than double that. Those numbers are terrible.
Reply
Matt Peckham 12:42PM (1/25/2008)
terrible? pathetic.
I bet the 60s versions that were heavier got better mileage.
Way to go, USA! We sure can crank out some great Matchbox cars.
tanooki2003 1:19PM (1/25/2008)
Pathetic? More like Disgustingly Atrocious!!
M 2:14PM (1/25/2008)
To all three of you dorks..... Stop posting about this car! I don't want to drive the same crap that you drive.
tanooki2003 2:32PM (1/25/2008)
I'm happy with what I drive, which is much more sporty than this tank and is quite fun to drive, not to mention it goes faster, on top of using less fuel than this old restored beast.
I think this Challenger may even use more fuel then Dr. Dre's hoopdied up Impala.
They call it the Challenger because it's not for the budgetly challenged and also it challenges you to bite your tongue everytime you get dirty glares from others at the gas pumps.
TwinTurbo3000GT 4:31PM (1/25/2008)
...what the hell is going on here? Everyone is missing the point! People who are going to buy this type af car dont care about MPG. They care about looks, noise, and strait-line speed. It wasnt desighed to be economical.
This is like faulting a prius for being slow in the 1/4 mile, or faulting a Lamborghini for having no offroad capability.
Matt 6:04PM (1/25/2008)
not really... performance cars can have decent mpg, the Vette gets 26 on the highway and even I in my Mustang get 24. This is a challenger, not a lambo. There's not excuse for such poor MPG ratings.
Scott Eaton 12:42PM (1/25/2008)
oh wait, now i remember... *that's* why muscle cars died out...
Reply
The Other Bob 12:45PM (1/25/2008)
Find me another car with 425 HP that does much better? It won't be a suped-up Civic.
Scott Eaton 12:47PM (1/25/2008)
How about a faster car that has less power?
John Johnson 12:57PM (1/25/2008)
Corvette Z06. 505 HP from a big V8. 26 highway mpg. You get 28 highway MPG if you go with the 400HP model.
FireStorm 1:01PM (1/25/2008)
The Other Bob: 2008 Corvette, 430hp, 26hwy, 16 cty
Justin 1:05PM (1/25/2008)
The corvette or a suped up civic don't have the same interior space or trunk space as a challenger, so its not too comparable. That being said, I'd like to see the figures for a comparable ls3 camaro as far as mpg, curb weight, and interior/trunk space. The camaro has got to be more aerodynamic, and I'd bet a GM ls3 v8 would get better mileage.
tbss_in_the_D 1:18PM (1/25/2008)
My TBSS AWD gets...
14 city if you stay out of the gas
19 hwy at around 75-80mph.
I can get over 20 if I set my cruise around 60-65ish.
Now I have more room then a challanger and I can drive it in the snow with my AWD. It is not that much better on gas, but I think Dodge could do better then this.
Guenther 3:36PM (1/25/2008)
The Other Bob- just to prove your point-
300 SRT8- 13/18, using "horrible archaic technology"
STS-V- 13/19, for an extra $36k
760iL- 13/20, with all the technology money can buy.
the CTS-V was rated at 16-25, but its smaller and those ratings are on the old scale.
Adam 4:43PM (1/25/2008)
@ The Other Bob:
The late Pontiac GTO is the answer to your question. 400 hp/400 lb-ft and 17 mpg city / 25 highway with the a manual tranny (16/21 with the auto). Trunk space and a back seat, just like you asked for.
I wonder how the new Pontiac G8 will sip fuel?
I guess these atrocious fuel economy numbers are why the Hemi will meet it's demise.
Eddie 12:44PM (1/25/2008)
Those are horrible numbers. How can it be nearly the same fuel economy as a Cayenne Turbo?
Reply
Owain Ozymandias Buck 12:44PM (1/25/2008)
Is anyone too surprised? I always said this thing was going to be too heavy. I wonder what the manual version will get; it should have a good, tall O.D.
I wonder what a manual V6 stripper will get?
Reply
Nicko 12:45PM (1/25/2008)
18 highway? That is abysmal. I'm still scratching my head as to why the big three are reviving the pony car nowadays. Yeah there cool to look at, but massive 2-doors with ridiculously thirsty V8's in 2008? Same with the Pontiac G8 GT, too much too late.
Reply
Mr. Oak 1:06PM (1/25/2008)
Because they sell. These are nohing more that adult toys. these are "FUN" cars, never intended to be practical.
Keep an eye on this. Now that domestics are building desirable, quality cars in the sweet-spot of the market defined by the imports, the imports will have to start building more creative cars to compete.
The Camry and Accord no longer live in a safe place virtually unchallenged by any of the domestics, there will come a day when the Camry and Accord will be fighting to hang on to their marketshare.
Cadillac dealers used car lots are filling up with imports, thanks to the CTS. A car that did not exist until 2002. My point is the game is changing, now it's the imports that will be put on the defensive.