Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
CAR reveals spy shots of McLaren P11 supercar
2010 Chevrolet Camaro priced: LS $22,995, SS $30,995
BREAKING: GM and Chrysler talking about merger
Spy Shots: Nissan 370Z again, with interior shots
2010 Mazda3 unveiled ahead of LA Auto Show
In the Autobog Garage: 2009 Chevy Cobalt SS Turbo
Knight Rider: The Liveblog -- Season 1, Episode 3
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Mazda RX-8 R3, return of the "hummer"
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Chevy Corvette Z06
Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
John R @ Jan 21st 2008 7:29AM
I'm going to be honest, I really don't see any similarity between these headlamps and the Verve's.
Anyway, I like the old FX better. The from the front this looks like what a Forrester STI might look like.
Carlos @ Jan 21st 2008 2:22PM
This is a very bad photoshop - the fenders, doors, side window arc, roof line, body panel seams and A pillar are all exactly the same as the current FX. Take the side profile picture and cover up the front end and you have the current FX.
A redesign would not include any of these parts, look at the new Murano redesign - every panel has been changed in some way.
Plus it doesn't add up - why would Inifiniti, a Japanese company, be testing an FX in Europe where the Dutch Autoweek was able to snap terrible pictures of it parallel parked on a public street. I think its more likely that this Dutch Autoweek is looking for some traffic to their site.
ugg.tryptophan @ Jan 21st 2008 3:58PM
bad photochop, you can tell because on the front end the foglights dont match, the left buldges out further than the right