![Bugatti Bird-gate Followup: Driver identity revealed <b>[*UPDATE:</b> Now with actual crash video!]](http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/bugatti-veyron-swim-1258147199_143x85.jpg)
Jeep Compass, Patriot getting freshened interiors
Click image for a gallery of the 2007 Jeep Compass
While everyone's waiting for Chrysler to fix the interiors of the Chrysler Sebring and Dodge Avenger, Cerberus has made a surprise decision to spruce up the Jeep side of the house first. Both the Compass and Patriot are getting freshened interiors, and not a moment too soon. While we haven't driven the Compass (which would benefit from a flamethrower to the exterior as well), we've spent some time with the Patriot, which shares its sibling's exceptionally unexceptional cabin appointments. Hard, cheap-looking, plastic abounds, and attention to detail is uneven at best. For example, there's all kinds of flash left on trim elements like the individual slats in the HVAC vents, and apparently, Chrysler expects the front seat occupants to supply their own padding for the granite-hard armrests. Overall, it's a resounding disappointment inside, which is unfortunate because the Patriot's boxy exterior style is solid, handsome, traditional Jeep. While it wasn't the most refined vehicle, it made for a solid little 4WD commuter (especially with the manual transmission). Almost everyone who saw it was immediately taken with its outward appearance. Open the door, however, and you get the impression that the passenger seat is coated in truth serum, and not just the bland-looking YES Essentials fabric that's standard in the Patriot Sport. Discussions frequently went something like this:
Passenger: "What the... It's like a total economy car inside."
Me: 'Well, that's because it's based on an economy car."
Passenger: "Ugh. Not good. I don't know if I could look at this every day."
According to Automotive News, to address the matter, Chrysler worked with a consultant to develop new Euro-style textures for the interior and also softened the armrests in the doors. AN reports that Chrysler wunder-designer Ralph Gilles admits the automaker "did some soul-searching" over the ComPatriot interiors...and he's talking about the time prior to the vehicles' respective launches. Doing it properly the first time around, of course, would eliminate the need for such introspection in the first place. Chrysler's domestic competition has upped the ante in terms of interior looks and refinement, and the Pentastar is in the unenviable position of having to play catch-up, even with its own essentially brand-new product. The new interior appointments arrive in the Fall for the Jeeps, with the Dodge Caliber getting a similar treatment shortly thereafter.
[Source: Automotive News -- sub. req'd.]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Kowell 10:39AM (1/21/2008)
Nice.... scrap the CVT for a real automatic transmission and we have a deal....!
Reply
FAB 10:40AM (1/21/2008)
Mmmm... Plastic boombastic...
Reply
Paul H. 10:52AM (1/21/2008)
Still looks like a Tupperware convention.
Reply
Alex Nunez 10:53AM (1/21/2008)
That's the old interior in the photos....
paul34 2:54PM (1/21/2008)
I suspect the newer ones, *in general* will still be pretty much the same.
I drive lots of these at work (Chryslers, Jeeps, AND dodges), and they all have one thing in common - MOST of them have decent *design* to their interiors (although you would expect something much better from Chrylser consideirng how they market their brand), but the materials they use are just downright embarrasing.
However, I will say Jeeps often have significantly better interiors compared to Dodge and Chrysler. Very odd. For example, while the interior of a Jeep Commander in the darker colors is actually quite acceptable, the same cannot be said for a single Chrysler or Dodge.
MemphisNET 3:01PM (1/21/2008)
Hey Paul. I 100% agree. The design is very nice in most cases, if somewhat bland (but not bad) in others.
The Charger/Magnum's is a case of bland but not bad. Now the 300 - regardless of trim (300, Touring or C) should have a premium look AND feel.
FAB 10:52AM (1/21/2008)
Why not scrap the whole freakin' thing??!!
Reply
John R 10:58AM (1/21/2008)
Why don't we just scrap Chrysler?
Reply
Jim 11:15AM (1/21/2008)
Great idea. Throw thousands of people out of work and further cripple a weak economy 'cos you don't like their cars. Sounds like a reasonable, mature point of view.
I'll never understand the mindset of jerks who say things like that.
John R 11:21AM (1/21/2008)
Calm down, dude. I'm sure if i said Toyota instead you wouldn't have a problem even though they employ in the US.
LX builder 11:29AM (1/21/2008)
No lets just scrap everything that didn't come from Japan, Germany, Korea, China or some other place other than our own country... cause we suck. Man oh man is it any wonder the economy is going into the crapper!
MemphisNET 12:01PM (1/21/2008)
The most opinionated are always the least informed.
John R 12:12PM (1/21/2008)
@Memphis
I'm sorry but its a sad state of affairs when Hyundai makes a better product. Drive a 3.3L Sonata and a range topping Sebring/Avenger back to back and tell me differently.
Unless you're buying a V8 or an SRT variant the powertrains are awful.
MemphisNET 12:48PM (1/21/2008)
Since your first post was ''Why don't we scrap Chrysler'' I question you and your clearly bias opinion. Anyone who has actually driven a Sebring sedan will say its comfy, but not sporty. The drivetrain is not the problem. I'm also well aware of Autoblogs opinion of the convertible. Most of their gripes were of the interior (give them that, materials are sub-par) handling (its not a sports car) and price (bring the materials up to premium/luxury levels, and the price issue will be gone). I think their review was somewhat limited in that not everyone is looking for a sports car. Reviewed in that light, it may have been written differently.
I have driven them back to back. (Sonata/Sebring) And only the interiors have disappointed me. When somebody goes in with a preconceived thought that they WILL not like a product, guess what - they won't. For all the people that hate the Sebring, I ask - how many of them have actually driven one. The fact that everything is rated as a sports car instead of the target market makes for poor perceptions.
John R 1:22PM (1/21/2008)
It's not baised, man. The cars stink.
I'm only calling a spade a spade. I didn't just wake up one day and said, "Hmmm...I hate Chrysler." I have actually driven the cars and they stink. I've never thought an interior could cause depression, but here we are.
I drive an 04 Intrepid and the current interiors in nearly every current example are generation behind that car.
Memphis, the interiors and the powertains are in need of serious re-tooling.
It's as I said unless you're buying a V8 or an SRT, Chrysler brings nothing to the table, interiors included.
John R 1:34PM (1/21/2008)
"The drivetrain is not the problem."
I'll just add this. The powertrains are a problem. They're behind the curve.
Sebring's 3.5, 230hp
Sonata's 3.3, 238hp
Malibu's 3.6, 252hp
Accord's 3.5, 268hp
Camry's 3.5, 268hp
Altima's 3.5, 270hp
MemphisNET 1:51PM (1/21/2008)
You're playing a numbers game and it doesn't add-up. And you still haven't made a valid reason. Being lower doesn't make it 'bad'. Do you really think the average buyer cares about the difference in acceleration from a stop light in two cars with a 40HP gap? My fathers 06 Sebring has the 2.7 rated at 200HP and it pulls that car along just fine, never a scary moment merging onto the highway. The cars may not be up to enthusiast standards, but is that their target? For their LX cars yes, and they've done very well - even with the 3.5 V6. The 2.7 is for fleet and meeting corporate fuel averages. The Sebring? No... not even close. Does it have to be (muscle, euro, sport) to be a good car? No.
Saying something closer too - "I don't like this car because I want a sporty car and this doesn't fit that need" would be an opinion. Saying "I have actually driven the cars and they stink." with nothing more is just a disconnected thought without a reason.
""I've never thought an interior could cause depression, but here we are."" Not sure what this means exactly, but I have never said their interiors were flawless or without problem.
I'm not trying to rain on your parade or have a pissing contest.. I just feel that a little thought behind an opinion, instead of reguritating the same crap from Car and Driver, Motor Trend and Road & Track (of whom all want a sports car in their lives) would be more worthy of conversation.
Now, you have an 04 Intrepid, and I loved that car - especially with the 3.2 - and the interior was very sharp and good looking, if only a bit harder to the touch in some areas. I think I've also said in other posts that it was a far superior interior compared to the current cars.
Mke 2:27PM (1/21/2008)
Haha, scrapping Chrysler would damage our economy even more?
Hmm. Interesting.
John R 2:31PM (1/21/2008)
Again, I've actually driven these cars and I'm not regurgitating magazine reviews.
Between my past experience and the spec sheet my point is this: Chrysler autmobiles do not excel in ANY areas (inteiors included, just so there isn't any misunderstanding) unless you buy their performance models. None.
Interiors? No. Performance? No. Value? No.
The numbers prove a point. If the performance is sub-par, the interiors are awful and their not a bargain monetarily. What is the value in buying a Chrysler?
MemphisNET 2:45PM (1/21/2008)
Nintendo's Wii & DS systems are inferior, low performance product as well. I guess millions of buyers of Nintendo and Chrysler products are wrong, and should seek help for being happy with their purchases.