Witness: LeBron James busted doing 101 MPH
Being that I hate the local news in my home town, I had to find out from our friends at Jalopnik that Cleveland's own self-made messiah, LeBron James, got busted for breaking the century mark while driving home from the airport after an away game in New Orleans. An Ohio State officer pulled James over in his white Mercedes early in the AM on December 30th, which also happened to be the NBA superstar's 23rd birthday. James pleaded not guilty to the charge and could get a $150 fine. The story might have ended there had James not commented to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, "It's no big deal. I was on my way home to go to sleep. You have to abide by the rules. I made a mistake." Now it seems the morally righteous are jumping on the King's case for playing down the significance of getting a triple-digit speeding ticket. We certainly don't condone speeding to excess, though we can relate to wanting to get home as fast as possible after, say, an exhausting auto show, and slip into a sleep coma. [Source: Associated Free Press via Jalopnik, Photo by David Liam Kyle/NBAE via Getty]
Get a WordPress.com Blog
_opt_thumbnail.jpg)
_thumbnail.jpg "2011 Audi A8: Live from Miami")
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Brent 6:35PM (1/18/2008)
What is the point of him pleading not guilty and then admitting to his mistake in the press?
Reply
Matt 7:15PM (1/18/2008)
Because he is a moron.
Andy 7:30PM (1/18/2008)
You don't even need a college degree to know that... stupid.
AnthWax84 8:52PM (1/18/2008)
have you just never gotten a ticket before. just because you admit to something out of court has no bearing on the judgement you recieve from the court. simply saying not guilty means that they will have to prove that he was speeding nothing more nothing less. anyone who recieves a ticket and just gives in is a moron not a person who gives the system and himself a chance.
im not saying that his plea will get him off more than likely he'll simply get a small fine and supervision. The ticket was for only 20 over not something ridiculous.
joe 9:33PM (1/18/2008)
It may be one thing to require the system to prove it, but what he has said in public amounts to an admission of guilt which is entirely admissable in court. He just closed the case. They don't have to prove that he was speeding; now they just have to prove the press accurately took his admission, and, if he later lies, then they can peg him with perjury. as far as i can tell, the only wiggle room left is what speed he was at.
Whitie 6:39PM (1/18/2008)
This went public a few days ago..
Reply
ocnj179 6:42PM (1/18/2008)
I don't understand the not guilty plea but I'm glad this wasn't a DUI
Reply
TwinTurbo3000GT 6:56PM (1/18/2008)
happens every day...this time it happened to someone famous, lol.
what was the speed limit? he may only have been doing like 20 over.
Reply
VP 7:07PM (1/18/2008)
Where exactly in America do you have 80MPH speedlimits for him to be doing only 20 over? I can make a pretty educated guess that there are no such limits in metro cleveland?
My question is: For going over 100 MPH why is the fine so small? I got bigger tickets for doing 80!!
Henry 7:16PM (1/18/2008)
Texas. Arizona, Utah and other states are considering 80. Many other states are considering 75. Of course they're not commensurately increasing driver education.
Andrew 8:07PM (1/18/2008)
If I'm not mistaken, Indiana and Michigan both have 75mph zones. I wouldn't be surprised if these stretched into Ohio. I don't recall the exact speed limit on the stretch of highway I rode in Ohio, though I could have sworn it was 70mph. Either way, I can't say too many bad things about the guy, as my first speeding ticket was 104 in a 55 on 294 just north of Chicago.
ocnj179 8:27PM (1/18/2008)
There are some highways in Texas were the speed limit is 80mph already.
AcuraDriver 12:27AM (1/19/2008)
It was on I71 in Ohio, and I live in Ohio. I71 is either 55mph or 65mph, depending on where you are at on it. I believe that I read that the part he was caught on was 65mph. Either way, he should not have been going that fast. How the hell is his ticket only $150 though?
Sean Morris 7:02PM (1/18/2008)
Nothing is wrong with 100 mph.
Reply
TwinTurbo3000GT 7:51PM (1/18/2008)
Seriously. Modern cars can do 100 easily, comfortly, and relatively safely. If you hit something, its not gonna make a whole lot of difference between 80 and 100. You're F@*$ed.
Sean Morris 7:55PM (1/18/2008)
You won't hit most things at 80 mph or 100 mph anyway.
Most of the time you will be under brakes and at some speed significantly slower.
I have hit an airbag before, and I like them. I have also cruised for hours and hours at 90-100 mph before without running into any solid objects.
100 mph is not fast.
mike 11:01AM (1/19/2008)
Dear Fool,
Yes, the ENGINE can do 100 mph, but, you haven't been reading AutoBlog to long, because you'd know that even Porsche fought an increase in roll-over protection. In other words you crest a hill doing 100, only to find a clump of traffic doing 65, or you crease a hill only to find cars streaming in from an on ramp still only doing 50mph, you SLAM on the brakes and put it into a spin to avoid hitting someone, or better yet you put it sideways and start to flip.
Your CAR is not built to protect you, legally, at anything more then 45 mph, except for Volvo.
Rent some TRACK TIME to test your car and your driving skills.
Sean Morris 11:22AM (1/19/2008)
Crest a hill at 100 mph and hit the brakes and spin ? Ever hear of ABS brakes ? Stability control. Even an athlete in a modern car probably would not spin.
A spin will happen when a car has an unbalance. Otherwise modern braking systems with ABS will allow the car to stop in a straight line.
If the track time was directed towards me , I was at the track yesterday. I am pretty sure within the last few years I spend more time at the track , than you spent in front of the computer.
paul34 7:13PM (1/18/2008)
The question is, what Mercedes was he driving?
Reply
Matt 7:16PM (1/18/2008)
Not one that could out run a Crown Vic!