As part of the press conference that also introduced the Hummer HX concept and the GM-Coskata partnership this morning, GM/Saab finally revealed the Saab 9-4X BioPower concept. The CUV drove onto the stage under a shake of fake snow and out popped two dolled up ski bunnies (well, one bunny and a hare, as it were).
We already know pretty much everything there is to know about this car, but it's worth repeating that this concept gets 245 hp and 353 Nm of torque (at 2500-5250 rpm) on gasoline versus 300 horses and 400 Nm (at 2600-5100 rpm) on delicious ethanol. Put gasoline in the tank and you can go 22.4 miles to the gallon (ethanol mpg was not disclosed, but it'll be less). A CUV very much like the 9-4X Concept, Saab's first, will likely be coming in 2009, so get ready to stick your skis into your biofuel car and hit the slopes. Video of the 9-4X unveiling is available after the jump.
Sweet jesus, I haven't seen an interrior that bad since the 86 Grand Am i learned to drive on. And 22mpg, are u serious? All that power and it's no faster then a lowly $22,000 VW Tiguan which gets 26 on the highway? Wow. Just wow.
The interior looks like a "concept" version of just about any other Saab interior (excluding the 9-2X and 9-7X) - instantly recognizable as a Saab interior if certainly not the most handsome on the market, subjectively speaking.
And ~22mpg [combined rating] for a vehicle this size is about par for the course. I would have liked to have seen a clean diesel appear as a drivetrain option but as this is still a "concept" - anything is possible for the production vehicle.
Are you serious? The interior is the best part of the car, it looks stunningly great, I really hope it looks about the same in the production car, and the climate control from the back seat is a nice touch
Correct and correct. I've owned saabs before, the interior is still horrid, even by saab standards.
The fuel economy comment should have been expanded, I'm sorry. In 2008, to debut a concept capable of hitting 0-60 in barely under 8 seconds while returning 22mpg combined and to require that much power to do so is just disappointing. I don't go to auto shows to see concepts which provide 'par for course' technology. Ie the R8 V12 TDI, yes it's heavy but the remarkable thing is, it'll meet the most stringent emissions requirements and provide better fuel economy then an R32, that's remarkable and forward thinking. And as you've mentioned, it would have been nice to see a clean diesel 'concept' with other automakers already selling clean diesel s in this segment (ie the aforementioned tiguan). It all seems so pointless to produce concepts which aren't that advanced (how many of it's owners are really going to fill up with E85), takes a lot more power, and just seems heavy and uninspiring.
I still think it looks great, the quality of the material may noot look the best, but I love the design.
Maybe it's a difference in european and american taste, some americans actually think Lexus have good looking interiors, I doubt many europeans do. And almost no american car has a good looking interior, but maybe you americans like it
with a little improvement this would be a great Cuv; round, flair out the fenders more,increase the depth in the hood creases and angle the front end in some...and it's a winner!
Yes, the interior is very good and very "saab looking" With one exception - the steering-wheel is UGLY!!! My recommendation is to take the 9-5 MY2005 sport steering-wheel as a basis and apply this concept to 9-4x
I know nobody is reading this anymore, but just in case, I have to correct #1 zamafir's loony mis-comparison:
The Tiguan is 14 inches shorter and 10 inches narrower than the 9-4X, and you expect the Saab to match its mpg? Wow! THe Tiguan is smaller than a Honda CR-V. Tiguan: 174.3 X 71.2 X 66.3 9-4X: 188 .0 X 81.9 X 66.3 Source: Motor Trend
Let's compare more correctly to a Touareg: Toureg: 187.2 X 75.9 X 68 9-4X: 188 .0 X 81.9 X 66.3
Base Toureg (3.6 VR6): mpg: 14/19 0-60: 8.3 sec Top speed: 122 mph
Saab 9-4X: mpg: 22 combined 0-60: 7.9 Top Speed: 146 mph
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
zamafir 3:37PM (1/13/2008)
Sweet jesus, I haven't seen an interrior that bad since the 86 Grand Am i learned to drive on. And 22mpg, are u serious? All that power and it's no faster then a lowly $22,000 VW Tiguan which gets 26 on the highway? Wow. Just wow.
Reply
TBlueMax 5:05PM (1/13/2008)
The interior looks like a "concept" version of just about any other Saab interior (excluding the 9-2X and 9-7X) - instantly recognizable as a Saab interior if certainly not the most handsome on the market, subjectively speaking.
And ~22mpg [combined rating] for a vehicle this size is about par for the course. I would have liked to have seen a clean diesel appear as a drivetrain option but as this is still a "concept" - anything is possible for the production vehicle.
Hansi 5:20PM (1/13/2008)
Are you serious?
The interior is the best part of the car, it looks stunningly great, I really hope it looks about the same in the production car, and the climate control from the back seat is a nice touch
zamafir 5:23PM (1/13/2008)
Correct and correct. I've owned saabs before, the interior is still horrid, even by saab standards.
The fuel economy comment should have been expanded, I'm sorry. In 2008, to debut a concept capable of hitting 0-60 in barely under 8 seconds while returning 22mpg combined and to require that much power to do so is just disappointing. I don't go to auto shows to see concepts which provide 'par for course' technology. Ie the R8 V12 TDI, yes it's heavy but the remarkable thing is, it'll meet the most stringent emissions requirements and provide better fuel economy then an R32, that's remarkable and forward thinking. And as you've mentioned, it would have been nice to see a clean diesel 'concept' with other automakers already selling clean diesel s in this segment (ie the aforementioned tiguan). It all seems so pointless to produce concepts which aren't that advanced (how many of it's owners are really going to fill up with E85), takes a lot more power, and just seems heavy and uninspiring.
zamafir 5:29PM (1/13/2008)
@Hansai, if http://www.autoblog.com/photos/detroit-2008-saab-9-4x-concept-live-reveal/579861/ is your definition of "stunningly great" then there's really no room for a reply by me, I've already stated it's one of the worst most dated interiors I've ever seen on a concept, bland, cheap, uninspired, tired, sad.
Hansi 5:36PM (1/13/2008)
I still think it looks great, the quality of the material may noot look the best, but I love the design.
Maybe it's a difference in european and american taste, some americans actually think Lexus have good looking interiors, I doubt many europeans do. And almost no american car has a good looking interior, but maybe you americans like it
alexer 9:58PM (1/13/2008)
saab is sexy!
Reply
the law 12:20AM (1/14/2008)
with a little improvement this would be a great Cuv; round, flair out the fenders more,increase the depth in the hood creases and angle the front end in some...and it's a winner!
Reply
Netware5 11:19AM (1/14/2008)
Yes, the interior is very good and very "saab looking" With one exception - the steering-wheel is UGLY!!! My recommendation is to take the 9-5 MY2005 sport steering-wheel as a basis and apply this concept to 9-4x
ted Y 10:32AM (1/15/2008)
I know nobody is reading this anymore, but just in case, I have to correct #1 zamafir's loony mis-comparison:
The Tiguan is 14 inches shorter and 10 inches narrower than the 9-4X, and you expect the Saab to match its mpg? Wow! THe Tiguan is smaller than a Honda CR-V.
Tiguan: 174.3 X 71.2 X 66.3
9-4X: 188 .0 X 81.9 X 66.3
Source: Motor Trend
Let's compare more correctly to a Touareg:
Toureg: 187.2 X 75.9 X 68
9-4X: 188 .0 X 81.9 X 66.3
Base Toureg (3.6 VR6):
mpg: 14/19
0-60: 8.3 sec
Top speed: 122 mph
Saab 9-4X:
mpg: 22 combined
0-60: 7.9
Top Speed: 146 mph
I'll take the Saab any day.
Reply
Tim 1:43PM (1/16/2008)
Thanks for following up. When I first read that guys comments, it stunk of truthiness.