<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for <i>Consumer Reports</i> names Nissan Altima top mid-size sedan</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/08/i-consumer-reports-i-names-nissan-altima-top-mid-size-sedan/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for <i>Consumer Reports</i> names Nissan Altima top mid-size sedan</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on <i>Consumer Reports</i> names Nissan Altima top mid-size sedan]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/08/i-consumer-reports-i-names-nissan-altima-top-mid-size-sedan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/08/i-consumer-reports-i-names-nissan-altima-top-mid-size-sedan/</guid><description><![CDATA[Matt, I agree that the lifetime costs of an Altima are likely to be greater than those of an Accord, but for a different reason.  Based on prices of used Altimas and Accords, I see that the Altima depreciates faster than the Accord.  Thus, if you buy a 2008 Altima and a 2008 Accord, chances are the Altima will lose a higher percentage of its new-car value than the Accord will.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[1337]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2008 6:36PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>