Filed under: Car Buying, Sedans/Saloons, Dodge, Ford, Honda, Kia, Nissan, Subaru
Consumer Reports names Nissan Altima top mid-size sedan
click above for more images of the 2008 Nissan Altima
The Nissan Altima narrowly beat out the Honda Accord for the coveted Consumer Reports Top-Ranked, Mid-priced Sedan, which is revealed in the February 2008 issue. The V6 Accord lost to the V6-powered Altima by a scant one-point, followed by the Toyota Camry and Volkswagen Passat.
Consumer Reports tested a number of family sedans for its February issue, ranging from the base four-cylinder models and up to the range-topping V6s. The selected vehicles, which also included the Ford Taurus, Dodge Avenger, Kia Amanti and Subaru Legacy, were broken down into three categories: "Affordable," "Mid-priced" and "Large" family sedans.
The four-cylinder Altima took the top spot in the "Affordable" category, leading by six points over the Accord, with the Kia Optima EX and Passat 2.0T coming in third and fourth, respectively.
Consumer Reports is quick to point out that the Accord, which has won the publications Top Pick for five years, outperformed the majority of the players, but in the end, the Altima proved to be the best value overall.
[Source: Consumer Reports]
Gallery: 2008 Nissan Altima Sedan
PRESS RELEASE
NISSAN ALTIMA INCHES PAST HONDA ACCORD TO BECOME
CONSUMER REPORTS' TOP-RANKED, MIDPRICED SEDAN
Very narrow, one-point difference in scores separates Altima and Accord in CR's ratings of competitive midpriced sedan category
YONKERS, NY - The newly-redesigned Honda Accord V6 lost its standing as Consumer Reports' top-rated midpriced sedan following testing of seven sedans for the February 2008 issue. The V6-powered Nissan Altima is now ranked first in CR's ratings of midpriced sedans, followed closely by the Accord, Toyota Camry and Volkswagen Passat in that order. A very narrow one-point difference in scores separates the Accord and Altima.
The Honda Accord, redesigned for 2008, has long been among Consumer Reports' top-rated family sedans. Consumer Reports has named the Accord a Top Pick in its closely-watched Annual April Auto Issue every year for the past five years. The new Top Picks for 2008 will be announced in the April 2008 issue.
For the February issue, Consumer Reports tested a mix of six family sedans from three categories- "Affordable Family Sedans," "Midpriced Family Sedans," and "Large Sedans." CR tested the Accord in EX-L V6 and four-cylinder LX-P trim levels. It also tested the new Ford Taurus (formerly known as the Five Hundred), Dodge Avenger, Kia Amanti, and Subaru Legacy. The magazine had rated the four-cylinder and V6-powered Altimas as part of an earlier test group; results from those tests were reported in the March 2007 issue.
The V6 Accord easily outperformed all the other vehicles in this test group-and achieved an "Excellent" overall road test score. But its score of 88 points was one point less than the previous generation Accord. That one-point difference allowed the previously-tested Altima 3.5 SE (V6) to slip past the Accord and take the top spot in the rankings of 15 Midpriced Sedans. The Camry XLE and Passat 2.0T rank third and fourth respectively in that category.
The four-cylinder Altima also claimed the top spot in CR's ranking of 15 Affordable Family sedans, with a much wider, six-point margin over the Accord. The Kia Optima EX and Toyota Camry LE are ranked third and fourth in that category.
"The 2008 Accord is longer, wider and more powerful than the old model it replaces-and it remains an excellent, well-rounded sedan," said David Champion, senior director of Consumer Reports' Auto Test Center in East Haddam, Connecticut. "But it's not as quick and doesn't get the fuel economy of either the previous generation Accord or the Altima in either the V6 or four-cylinder trim lines."
The 2008 V6 Accord delivered 21 mpg in Consumer Reports' own fuel economy tests, down two mpg from the previous generation's 23 mpg. The V6 Altima delivers 23 mpg in CR's tests.
Prices range from $22,795 for the Accord LX to $30,130 for the Amanti, though CR paid less than $25,000 after discounts for the Kia. Consumer Reports buys all of its test vehicles from dealers to ensure that it doesn't wind up with specially-prepared vehicles. Its staffers negotiate anonymously for the best possible price, just as consumers would do.
Four of the six vehicles in this month's test group are Recommended by Consumer Reports. Because of a sterling reliability history for past Accords and for Honda overall, CR predicts better than average reliability for the 2008 Accord and is recommending it. Above average reliability also allows CR to recommend the Legacy. CR is predicting average reliability for the Taurus based on the record of the Ford Five Hundred, which is virtually the same car. The Amanti's reliability has been worse than average, so it cannot be Recommended. Reliability for the Avenger is unknown and it scored too low in CR's tests for it to be Recommended.
Consumer Reports only Recommends vehicles that have performed well in its tests, have at least average predicted reliability based on CR's Annual Car Reliability Survey of its more than seven million print and web subscribers, and performed at least adequately if crash-tested or included in a government rollover test.
Full tests and ratings of the test group appear in the February issue of Consumer Reports, which goes on sale January 8. The reports are also available to subscribers of www.ConsumerReports.org. The new Accord has a generously-sized backseat and both four- and six-cylinder versions are more powerful than before. Electronic stability control is now standard in all trim levels and crash-test results impressive. The Accord EX-L ($28,695 Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price as tested) is powered by a 3.5-liter, 268-hp V6 engine that delivers smooth and lively performance. It's mated to a five-speed automatic transmission that shifts quickly and smoothly. Braking is very good overall.
The renamed and freshened Ford Five Hundred is equipped with a more powerful engine that makes the vehicle quicker and more responsive-though not as fuel efficient. The Taurus offers a comfortable ride, ample interior room, easy access, and a huge trunk. It remains a solid, if unexciting contender in the segment. The Taurus Limited ($28,985 MSRP as tested) is now equipped with a 3.5-liter, 263-hp, V6 that delivers good performance but isn't among the more refined powerplants in this class. The six-speed automatic is smooth and responsive. Braking is very good overall.
Kia's Amanti offers a well-appointed, spacious cabin and a quiet, comfortable ride. It was freshened for 2007 with a new engine and has a revised suspension to improve ride and handling. Fuel economy is not a strong suit. The Amanti ($30,130 MSRP as tested) is equipped with a 3.8-liter, 264-hp, V6 engine that delivers strong performance. It's mated to a responsive five-speed automatic. Braking is good.
With impressive agility, decent fuel economy, standard all-wheel-drive and an affordable base, the Subaru Legacy has a lot going for it. But the interior is snug, which limits its appeal as a family car, and its handling was tricky in emergency avoidance maneuver tests. The 2.5i Special Edition Legacy tested by CR ($22,835 MSRP as tested) is equipped with a 2.5-liter, 170-hp, four-cylinder engine that provides adequate acceleration but is not as responsive as most other four-cylinder engines in this class. The four-speed automatic shifts smoothly. Braking is very good.
Like its near-twin the Chrysler Sebring, the Dodge Avenger ranks at the bottom of its class. The car feels cheap and underdeveloped. It has a stiff ride, suspension noise, lack of agility, tight quarters, uncomfortable seats, and substandard interior fit and finish. The Avenger R/T ($27,350 MSRP as tested) is powered by a 3.5-liter, V6 engine that delivers lively performance and is smoother than the 2.7-liter V6 that CR tested in the Sebring. But it is not as refined as many other V6 engines. It's mated to a very good six-speed automatic transmission. Braking on the Avenger is good overall.
Consumer Reports is one of the most trusted sources for information and advice on consumer products and services. It conducts the most comprehensive auto-test program of any U.S. publication or Web site; the magazine's auto experts have decades of experience in driving, testing, and reporting on cars. To subscribe to
Consumer Reports, call 1-800-234-1645. Information and articles from the magazine can be accessed online at
www.ConsumerReports.org.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
mcheddadi 2:35PM (1/08/2008)
take that honda accord! :p
Reply
Sandeep 2:38PM (1/08/2008)
So the Accord's score (and mpg) actually went DOWN with a redesign? And I thought BMW screwed up with the 5series redesign...
Kudos to the Altima for displacing the champ. I am actually tempted to go test drive one, now.
Reply
PJ 3:01PM (1/08/2008)
Not only did the MPG go down, the ergonomics are much fussier than in previous Accords, and it now drives little differently from a Camry--a Camry with quicker (but equally fluffy) steering pretty much sums it up.
I frankly don't think the V6 Altima feels significantly sportier to drive than the V6 Accord or Camry, but it does cost less, has simpler controls, and gets better mileage courtesy of the CVT. Still, it's no thrill ride aside from the excess thrust common to most V6 sedans these days.
Matt W. 3:16PM (1/08/2008)
While I enjoyed my test drive of the Altima 2.5 -- two years ago mind you -- I'd have to disagree with CR on one issue: value. Sure, the upfront costs are competitive, but if you are buying and not leasing, then think twice about the Altima because of its CVT, which will cost you more to maintain than a regular automatic transmission. Sure, the CVT saves you at the pump, so you can pay it to the mechanic when it comes time to change the transmission fluid.
psarhjinian 5:23PM (1/08/2008)
Is a CVT really less reliable than a conventional AT? It has far fewer moving parts and, if something does go wrong, it's a much easier fix than the gears-and-valves bonanza that a modern 6AT is.
I mean, take poor care of either and you're looking at a huge bill, but as the victim of a malfunctioning transmission, I'll take the easier-to-service design any day of the week.
1337 6:36PM (1/08/2008)
Matt, I agree that the lifetime costs of an Altima are likely to be greater than those of an Accord, but for a different reason. Based on prices of used Altimas and Accords, I see that the Altima depreciates faster than the Accord. Thus, if you buy a 2008 Altima and a 2008 Accord, chances are the Altima will lose a higher percentage of its new-car value than the Accord will.
Dan 6:59PM (1/08/2008)
FWIW, Edmunds' TCO tool predicts total maintenance costs for the first 75,000 miles at $4,100 for the V6 Accord, $3,300 for the V6 Altima.
The only category in which they give a meaningful cost advantage to the Accord is insurance.
jJack 9:01AM (1/09/2008)
Hey, why not test drive a Malibu against the others. I have and was sold on it. Trust me, don't believe CR. They are stuck with Japanese cars and no matter good what GM or Ford makes, in their eyes, it can never be a winner.
Red Star 2:40PM (1/08/2008)
I drove Altima 2.5 once and that car is so boring to drive. I would never own something like that.
Reply
John R 2:48PM (1/08/2008)
I wonder what car you did find interesting to drive...
Ligor 2:53PM (1/08/2008)
sorry but against the Accord the Altima is the sports car of the two.
you need to go drive both back to bakc and you'll see. I've driven both and the Camry and mazda 6, and while the Mazda does feel a bit more sporty the 2.5L in the altima has a better power band and wins me over.
ChrisH 1:23AM (1/15/2008)
The 2008 Altima is an entirely different ride -- you shouldn't judge what you haven't experienced. Most car mags credit it with being the sportiest family mid-size sedan.
Benfolio 2:43PM (1/08/2008)
Ugh, I had a '07 Altima 2.5 rental not too long ago. Uncomfortable seats, cheap interior, couldn't adjust the wheel comfortably without blocking the gauges, but it had nice power for a 4cyl, even if it was a tad loud for a family sedan.
Reply
Mike 2:55PM (1/08/2008)
i agree with you, very noisy car, not to mention the total lack of refinement of the whole thing.
Matt Keller 2:44PM (1/08/2008)
The Malibu will outscore it.
Reply
bobfranks 6:37PM (1/08/2008)
and the Nissan will out live it.
Bob-omb 11:44AM (1/09/2008)
Keep dreaming.
John R 2:45PM (1/08/2008)
hmmm...they didn't get their hands on a malibu?
Reply
Pete 2:46PM (1/08/2008)
No one can!!
the marais 2:47PM (1/08/2008)
Hah. CR calls the Taurus "boring," and then recommends the generic plasticky Altima overall. VW Passat? Are you kidding? Reliability? Costs of ownership? Hello?
Where were the Fusion, Aura, and Malibu in this comparison?
Reply