Ford is using the 2008 Detroit Auto Show to kick off the transition of a significant portion of their engine lineup to what they are calling EcoBoost technology. EcoBoost consists of smaller displacement engines with direct fuel injection and turbocharging (GDTI) to provide a fuel economy boost without any loss of performance. Ford first showed the idea in the 2007 Lincoln MKR concept when it was called Twin-Force. The Twin-Force name has been set aside in favor of one that emphasizes the efficiency aspects of the technology. Thanks to the combination of small low-inertia turbos, the direct injection and variable valve timing, the new engines should have no lag and a much fatter, flatter torque curve. The first EcoBoost engine out of the gate is the 340hp 3.5L V-6, This will be the optional engine in the Lincoln MKS starting in 2009 in place of a V-8. Besides having higher specific efficiency than a larger normally aspirated engine, the smaller EcoBoost units also save weight and size. The 3.5L saves over 150 lbs. compared to the 4.6L V-8 also helping contribute to fuel efficiency savings of up to 20%. Following the MKS with EcoBoost will be the Ford Flex and the new Explorer based on the Explorer America concept. The new SUV is expected to use GDTI engines exclusively, with a 275hp 2.0L four as the base engine and the 3.5L six as the option. Ford is by no means the first to do this, with Volkswagen pushing the tech for several years already on their TSI and TFSI engines. aMazda and GM also use the same principle. Ford really wants to make it mainstream, however, with over half a million EcoBoost engines annually within five years. Read more about EcoBoost over at AutoblogGreen.
[Source: Ford, AutoblogGreen]
Ford press release
FORD TO EQUIP HALF A MILLION VEHICLES WITH ECOBOOST ENGINE TECHNOLOGY FOR UP TO 20% BETTER FUEL ECONOMY
DETROIT, Jan. 6, 2008 – Ford Motor Company is introducing a new engine technology called EcoBoost that will deliver up to 20 percent better fuel economy on half a million Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles annually in North America during the next five years.
The EcoBoost family of 4-cylinder and 6-cylinder engines features turbocharging and direct injection technology. Compared with more expensive hybrids and diesel engines, EcoBoost builds upon today's affordable gasoline engine and improves it, providing more customers with a way to improve fuel economy and emissions without compromising driving performance.
"EcoBoost is meaningful because it can be applied across a wide variety of engine types in a range of vehicles, from small cars to large trucks – and it's affordable," said Derrick Kuzak, Ford's group vice president of Global Product Development.
"Compared with the current cost of diesel and hybrid technologies, customers can expect to recoup their initial investment in a 4-cylinder EcoBoost engine through fuel savings in approximately 30 months. A diesel will take an average of seven and one-half years, while the cost of a hybrid will take nearly 12 years to recoup – given equivalent miles driven per year and fuel costs," he said.
Ford will introduce EcoBoost on the new Lincoln MKS flagship in 2009, followed by the Ford Flex and other vehicles. By 2013, Ford will have more than half a million EcoBoost-powered vehicles on the road annually in North America.
In 2009, Ford first will introduce EcoBoost on the Lincoln MKS featuring a 3.5-liter twin-turbocharged V-6. It will produce the power and torque of a V-8 engine with the fuel efficiency of a V-6. In fact, with an estimated 340-horsepower and more than 340 lb.-ft. of torque, the Lincoln MKS will be the most powerful and fuel-efficient all-wheel-drive luxury sedan in the market.
More With Less
EcoBoost's combination of direct injection and turbocharging mitigates the traditional disadvantages of downsizing and boosting 4- and 6-cylinder engines, giving customers both superior performance as well as fuel economy.
With direct injection, fuel is injected into each cylinder of an engine in small, precise amounts. Compared to conventional port injection, direct injection produces a cooler, denser charge, delivering higher fuel economy and performance.
When combined with modern-day turbocharging – which uses waste energy from the exhaust gas to drive the turbine – direct injection provides the best of both worlds: the responsiveness of a larger-displacement engine with fewer trips to the gas pump.
Ford's 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6, for example, can deliver upwards of 340-plus lb.-ft. of torque across a wide engine range – 2,000 to 5,000 rpm versus 270 to 310 lb.-ft of torque for a conventional naturally aspirated 4.6-liter V-8 over the same speed range. At the same time, this V-6 gives customers an approximate 2 mpg improvement and emits up to 15 percent fewer CO2 emissions to the environment.
Direct injection coupled with turbocharging allows for the downsizing of engines that deliver improved torque and performance. A small 4-cylinder EcoBoost engine has the capability of producing more torque than a larger 4-cylinder engine – nearly an entire liter larger in displacement – with better fuel efficiency.
The real-world fuel economy benefit is consistent no matter the drive cycle, meaning the engine is efficient in the city as well as on the highway – unlike hybrids, which are most efficient in stop-and-go traffic. In addition, customers who tow and haul – and have long turned to more expensive diesel powertrains for their superior towing capabilities – can find the engine performance they need from an EcoBoost powertrain.
EcoBoost – combined with multi-speed transmissions, advanced electric power steering, weight reductions and aerodynamic improvements – is part of Ford Motor Company's strategy to deliver sustainable, quality vehicles that customers want and value. Additional hybrid offerings and diesel engines are planned for light-duty vehicles.
Longer term, Ford plans to remain aggressive in the development of plug-in hybrids and hydrogen fuel cell-powered vehicles.
"We know that what will make the biggest difference is applying the right technology on volume vehicles that customers really want and value and can afford," said Kuzak. "EcoBoost puts an affordable technology within reach for millions of customers, and Ford's systems approach adds up to a big idea that differentiates Ford's sustainability strategy in the market."













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
tbirdman @ Jan 6th 2008 12:20AM
sad that they set aside the awesome name of twin-force name.
Daniel @ Jan 8th 2008 3:10PM
Good Idea!
Now make it in DIESEL.
MotoHead! @ Jan 6th 2008 12:29AM
what was wrong with the "twin force" name...
stupid decision again from a once great company.....maybe they should pull the ol' "lets not name this the 500 anymore and rename it taurus again"
Bonacci @ Jan 6th 2008 12:51AM
They thought that the TwinForce name would make people think Power and not Fuel saving
naggs @ Jan 6th 2008 3:33PM
i actually like ecoboost
C.W. @ Jan 7th 2008 8:00AM
why does everyone think that Ford or any other company just sits back and one day decides they dont like a name, or product or color or whatever? the fact is, independent studies showed consumers did not like Twin Force for the reason Bonacci mentioned. They do however like EcoBoost. Thus, namechange.
Adam @ Jan 6th 2008 12:35AM
275 bhp out of a 2.0L is pretty damn impressive! I'm kind of taken aback that Ford is coming out with this technology considering their recent track record.
Imagine a C1 Focus with that 2.0L motor!!!
Nick @ Jan 6th 2008 3:01AM
Until you consider that Japan has been doing it for 20 years...
Adam @ Jan 6th 2008 4:25AM
Of course, but this is a mainstream engine not something found in high-strung pseudo WRC cars.
naggs @ Jan 6th 2008 3:51PM
5,000 units a year is one thing
500,000 units is another
C.W. @ Jan 7th 2008 8:03AM
people forget (like Nick) that although Japan and GM in some instances have used this principal in the past, they have never been able to get the performance or economy boost Ford has achieved here. it truly is groundbreaking. This will be the first application of this technology where fuel increases will be over 20% and performace will also INCREASE.
Ken @ Jan 6th 2008 12:43AM
I'm not a hater, bring it on - lets see what it can do!
Imagine that 275 HP I4 in a Mazda or something else that already has a 'sporty' disposition (Mazda 3 or 6).
danieldacey @ Jan 6th 2008 3:54AM
Soon to be superceded Mazdaspeed 6 put out 266 horsepower, so basically Mazda have already done something similar with direct injection and turbo etc.
Of course Ford are going mainstream with the technology, so thats good.
why not the LS2LS7? @ Jan 6th 2008 12:22PM
The Mazdaspeed6 already has a 2.3L direct injected turbo 4 making 275HP.
d @ Jan 7th 2008 11:18PM
It already is - see MazdaSpeed6
500 @ Jan 6th 2008 12:46AM
I agree with the first couple of posters: impressive output, but "EcoBoost" sounds so much lamer than "Twin-Force." C'mon, who really gets excited when they hear the (GM) "Ecotec" name?
I do think that the 340hp 3.5L should be standard at launch for the MKS to be taken seriously.
Toy Yoda @ Jan 6th 2008 1:49AM
Maybe it sounds too much like "Wonder Twin Powers activate! Form of a fuel injector! Shape of a cylinder!"
digitalzombie @ Jan 6th 2008 12:48AM
At first I thought WHOA new technologies!! Then I was like oh fancy name for turbo and direct injection. The only thing worth noting is that they have decided to go for direct injection; as for turbo part it's just whatever since turbo is old tech and well.. a lot of cars have it.
Pretty neat though. But 2 mpg increase is not much... for all that costly parts turbos,intercooler (if they have one), and direct injections. What get to me, is that they says UP TO 20% lol.
"Additional hybrid offerings and diesel engines are planned for light-duty vehicles. "
Stuka @ Jan 6th 2008 2:37AM
It may be 2% fuel economy increase, but its a huge jump in power. A lower power output version could have incredible milage increases.
mike @ Jan 6th 2008 10:17AM
Exactly. Once you get to 200 hp and realize you can't use it 99.999% of the time, getting 275 hp instead of a Big Jump in Fuel Economy seems to show where their priorities lay. And it's not about helping Americans balance their budget's or do some small thing for the environment or cut our imports of oil.
It's about keeping that consumption going for Big Oil.