Review: 2008 Chrysler Sebring Limited Convertible
On paper, the Sebring seems to have what it takes, including three engine choices, an optional six-speed automatic, a sedan and convertible, and nifty cup holders that keep your drink hot or cold. We gave a top of the line Limited Sebring Convertible one week in the Autoblog Garage win us over, but things didn't go as planned. Read about what happened after the jump.
All photos Copyright ©2007 Chris Shunk / Weblogs, Inc.
We typically have one week to review a vehicle, but our time with the Sebring Convertible was really a tale of two drop-tops. We originally received the silver Sebring Limited cloth top convertible you see above. We only spent an hour driving it with the top down because some insurmountable mechanical issues occurred that ruined our fun. The first issue came when the top froze only a quarter of the way into its disappearing act. After a quick restart of the car it began to retract again, but after nestling itself in the boot, the trunk lid refused to close. Being no convertible mechanic, we made room for the Sebring Convertible in my own personal Autoblog Garage and parked it.
When we spoke with Chrysler about the situation, we were informed that this was the second time that week a top had frozen while in the hands of a journalist. A mechanic was dispatched to pick up the busted cabrio and when he couldn't fix it, the silver Sebring Convertible was carted off on a flat bed. Not a very good first impression, but we got our hands on a fully functioning replacement a month later.
Our first Sebring was a base Limited that carried what we consider to be an astonishing MSRP of just over $32,000. When we received our replacement, a fully loaded Inferno Red Chrystal Pearl Limited model, its $36,000 price tag set our knees a-warbling. It included the top-end 3.5L V6 mated to a six speed automatic, navigation screen, 20 gigabyte MyGig entertainment system, and a killer Boston Acoustics sound system. The only option not checked on our Limited model was the hard-top roof, which sets you back another $2,000. A $38,000 Sebring? Ouch!
Chrysler turned to its 2003 Airflite concept for inspiration when designing the Sebring, and the difference between the concept and production car is that while the former had smooth, tight packaging with a sexy roof-line that extended all the way to the rear bumper, the Sebring has odd proportions and a bulbous rear end. Chrysler also super-sized the Sebring's head lights, shrunk the grille, lifted the belt-line and made the trunk large enough to accommodate the roof and people's stuff. The sedan is just plain difficult to look at without flinching, though we thought the lines at least look better as a convertible.
On the inside, our loaded Limited was chock-full of cheap materials and sub-standard build quality. For example, the steering wheel had frayed strings of plastic undoubtedly from a bad press cut at the plant. The Sebring's dash material had a rubbery feel to it with Tupperware-grade plastics not befitting a $36,000 vehicle. The other odd omission was the lack of vanity mirror lights. It seems trivial, but on a convertible playing in the $30k segment, it's yet another reminder that the Sebring doesn't belong.
The seats up front were decently bolstered and comfortable, and although the leather surfaces were a little slippery for our tastes, our overall impression was favorable. The back seats, however, afforded only slightly more room than the smallish 2007 Volkswagen EOS we reviewed over the summer.The news inside the Sebring isn't all bad, however, as some areas received high marks. Chrysler's multimedia interface with the 20-gigabyte MyGig system, large navigation screen and Boston Acoustics sound system was fantastic. The sound quality is as good as any in this price range, and the nav screen was bright and simple to use. The redundant controls for the radio, however, are located behind the steering wheel. It was an ergonomic nightmare that had us changing the radio station when we meant to raise the volume. We loved the heated and cooled cup holders up front, as they kept our Dunkin' Donuts coffee hot and our Dr. Pepper cold. This feature should reside within every Chrysler product, and fast.
When behind the wheel of the 235-hp Sebring Convertible, we received a driving experience that brought us back to a 1995 Buick LeSabre. It's as if Chrysler simply rushed the Sebring to market without hammering out the finer details of its handling. The steering feel was so light that we could have turned the car by sneezing at the dash. When taking corners at any speed above idle, the top-heavy convertible wallowed back and forth with the agility of 1993 GMC Jimmy. Even when changing lanes, it felt as though we were blindly guessing how much effort to apply to the steering wheel. This brought us to the simple conclusion the Sebring Convertible was designed with retirees and rental companies in mind.
While the acceleration of the 3.5L V6 was strong enough (other automakers can get a lot more than 235 hp out of 3.5 liters of displacement), the six-speed automatic would sometimes shift at odd times and jerk in lower gears. It wasn't nearly as smooth as the six-speed transmission shared by Ford and GM. On the fuel front, we averaged around 21 mpg with an even mix of city and highway driving .
With the top down, it's easier to forgive a soft, floating chassis and a cheap interior. The roof opens and closes easily with little more than the press of a button, and the entire car looks more appealing when the top is stowed. Wind noise is within expectations when enjoying open-air motoring in the Sebring Convertible, and the top can stay down when the temperature turns cool if you turn on the mighty heater.
As you can no doubt tell if you've made it this far, we weren't impressed with Chrysler's latest convertible offering. We were flat out unimpressed with its exterior design, interior materials and driving characteristics. The only attractive feature of the Sebring Convertible was its multimedia system, but that's no reason to drop $36k on any car.
Truth be told, however, the Chrysler Sebring Convertible doesn't have much competition. There's just the Pontiac G6 Convertible and Toyota Solara Convertible, as well as perhaps the Ford Mustang Convertible. We bet that none of those convertibles, however, enjoys as many fleet sales as the Chrysler Sebring Convertible. Ask any rental company for a convertible and the person behind the counter will probably ask you what color Sebring you'd like. With its hefty price tag, awkward design and floaty handling, we couldn't recommend this vehicle to a friend unless he were on vacation and planned to give it back in three days.
All photos Copyright ©2007 Chris Shunk / Weblogs, Inc.

















Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Tom Lee 11:21PM (2/11/2008)
Just because some critics say Chrysler is crap doesn't always mean they're right. Be a leader not a follower.
Reply
Robert O 12:09PM (1/04/2008)
It really is too bad that the only legitimate 4-passenger American-made convertible has morphed into such a dud. It's ugly, the interior looks good but is cheap, and its expensive. Such a fall from grace for the company that brought back the American Convertible in the 1980's.
Reply
The Other Bob 12:34PM (1/04/2008)
"It really is too bad that the only legitimate 4-passenger American-made convertible has morphed into such a dud."
I have had 4 adults in both a Mustang convertable and a G-6. The Mustang is tight, but the G-6 wasn't too bad. Both of these and the Sebring convertible are made in Michigan.
You are right through. It is a shame this one is such a dud. How can a company with so many design hits (Prowler, Viper, PT, 300C) have such a strike-out with this car?
Robert O 12:46PM (1/04/2008)
I forgot about the Pontiac.
MachinaDC5 12:03PM (1/08/2008)
The Other Bob, you call the Prowler, PT, and 300C design HITS?! Those are easily some of the worst looking cars ever designed and released in America. Chrysler desperately needs to re-do its entire design strategy with making horrid looking cars out of the cheapest materials money can buy and dropping in terribly inefficient engines. GM's a fine example of how to turn around a company, and Chrysler is the exact opposite: a perfect way to see how to bankrupt a potentially viable business.
blogged to death 1:58PM (1/04/2008)
Of course they were hits! The Prowler was so successful Plymouth had to be retired. The Prowler has to be one of the ugliest cars ever sold. Beauty is only in the eye of the maker.
The Viper is menacing and a hit - but at < 800 cars a year average volume? The 300 was a by far the only design and sales hit Chrysler has had but 300/Magnums are now being poured into fleets to keep inventory levels manageable - in fact the Magnum is being cancelled. With the PT...yeah it started the "retro" craze but a 30's minivan on a Neon platform really needs to go out to pasture.
MemphisNET 12:12PM (1/04/2008)
Shame. I loved the 1st gen Sebring Convertible. Great handling, good power, even the plastics were better!
Good thing team strike-force project D is on the job.. they just need to pull it off.
Doesn't have to be a Mustang. But it doesn't have to be a sponge either.
Reply
Noe 12:12PM (1/04/2008)
piece of S*#T!!!!! thats what you guys should have said.
Reply
iamhoff 8:14PM (1/05/2008)
Could not agree more. I will agree with AB that the Sebring's exterior looks much less offensive as a convertible than it does as a sedan. And from personal experience with my 2006 Grand Cherokee, Chrysler's Boston Acoustics stereo systems are top notch. That being said, I have zero plans to own any other Chrysler product. The problems detailed here are simply unacceptable in a $36k vehicle, and I've got a laundry list of problems that I've had over 34k miles in a $33k Grand Cherokee. HVAC failure, broken plastic bits, dash electronics going haywire, broken exhaust manifold, and it goes on. I really want to like American products, but I've gotta cross Chrysler off the list. At least GM is showing promise.
MemphisNET 12:14PM (1/04/2008)
They made Limo's, Vans, Compacts, ''full-size'' and convertibles on one platform. Hopefully they can turn it around.
And where the hell is my 300C Helios!!
Reply
Tyo 12:14PM (1/04/2008)
I have a 1993 GMC Jimmy, 200hp optional HO Vortec. It handles great, even in the shape its in. 110mph+ no problem. Sometimes youve gotta steer with your rear tires, but thats not necessarily a bad thing.
Reply
jg 1:02PM (1/04/2008)
I have a 94 Jimmy (S15). We only have 200hp? From a 4.3 V6? That seems kind of low for a (relatively) heavy 4x4 vehicle.
Tyo 1:03PM (1/04/2008)
the HO Votec 4.3 is 200hp and 260lb-ft of torque, the torque is alot even by todays v6 standards and for the time 200hp was great. In comparison, a Current Trailblazer has 275hp/275lb ft but is over 1,000lbs heavier. The 4.3 was a torque monster.
Mercury Fan Forever 12:18PM (1/04/2008)
I actually think the convertible looks good but from what you say it sounds like its just a complete piece of junk.
And asking $36,000-$38,000 dollars for it is just a joke.
Reply
CoffeeMan 2:42PM (1/04/2008)
It seems that Chrysler has taken the "Worst all-new Car of the Millenium" award from the previous winner the Saturn Ion...
MemphisNET 12:24PM (1/04/2008)
I think its a good looking car, if only a few weird design cues on the front bumper, I hate the ribbed hood, and the rear lamps are odd.
They're fixing the materials, but they need to be first class to justify that 36-38k range.
Reply
Jeff 12:34PM (1/04/2008)
I have the Pontiac G6 convertible. Comfortable ride for 4 full size adults, hard top with no wind noise, convertible fun on nice sunny days. 3.9L engine, average 21mpg around town and 29mpg on the hightway. It has a pushrod engine and 4spd tranny which is not state of the art techie stuff, but it's also bullet proof. It handles reasonably well (it's not a Porsche, but it's not meant to be either).
Beats the heck out of this Chrysler and with the retractable hardtop, the G6 is less expensive than the Chrysler's soft top.
18K miles on the clock and no visits to the shop other than oil change and fix a flat tire (nail).
Reply
The Other Bob 1:45PM (1/04/2008)
And it didn't cost you anywhere near 36k.
The G-6 is underrated.
Bill 12:35PM (1/04/2008)
Wasn't this original platform called the JA or JH or something?
It's a shame this is so poorly executed. I had a 97 Stratus, and I thought the original platform of this was pretty darn competitive for the time when it came out. Good handling, good ride, great MPG, huge trunk. Yes the interior bits were not as refined, but it sure wasn't 30+ grand either.
Reply
Frank 2:40PM (1/04/2008)
"I had a 97 Stratus, and I thought the original platform of this was pretty darn competitive... "
It was. I too owned a 1st gen "cloud car" and they were very competive even with the Japanese.
My wifes grandmother swore by Honda's. She bought a brand new Accord every time they came out with a refresh. At the time she had the I believe the '94 for a couple of years. She had an opportunity to drive my Stratus ES and liked it very much. Thought it drove as well as her Honda - and she despised American cars. I wonder what the Sebring would be like now if Chrysler wasn't taken over and had kept their $10 billion product development fund?