
click to enlarge and view the Camaro prototype in various colors
While we were grateful that Bob Lutz ordered the removal of camouflage from all of the Camaro prototypes running around in view of the public, the teaser image that GM provided was a bit too eency weency for our tastes. TheGMSource, however, found a larger version, or artfully blew up the small one, that shows a lot more detail. We can see the faux vents ahead of the rear wheels, as well as the surfacing of the Camaro's rear with its faux diffuser (at least we think it's faux). Whoa, this thing's got a lot of faux parts, but don't expect it to be a poser on arrival. Chevy is no doubt infusing the Camaro with enough mechanical fortitude to hang with the Ford Mustang and Dodge Challenger from day one.
TheGMSource also followed up with questions for Scott Settlemire, a member of the Camaro team at Chevy. His words are not unexpected when he says that the Camaro is about 65% production ready, and what you see in spy photos, even the one supplied by GM, does not mean you're looking at the car that will end up on dealer lots. His reference to the Camaro prototype's horrible headlamps is hilarious, and he was careful to point out that the interior shot does not necessarily show the final dash design, either.
Oh, and just for fun, we played with the larger pic in Photoshop and changed the prototype's boring white into all the various official colors that we expect will be offered on the production model. We're not very good at Photoshop, so if any pros want to try, let us know the results by emailing them to abresearch at gmail dot com.
UPDATE: Thanks to CamaroZ28.com forum member Rampant, there are now some colorized Camaro images in the gallery that are actually good!
[Source: TheGMSource]










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
VP @ Jan 4th 2008 4:06PM
Maybe the following quote from Scott will satisfy some of you who were scathing the general for the interior of the camaro:
" Interior pictures are very misleading. As I said above, many of the parts are either pre-production -- 'off the shelf' parts to serve as placeholders -- or hard plastic and used only as a 'stand in.'"
Patience my friends; this is just a mule.
meshies @ Jan 4th 2008 4:31PM
I dont understand why that was so hard for people to understand.
SGV @ Jan 4th 2008 5:06PM
Oh, sure what were you expecting him to say?
The general design is a disaster, you could show that interior with the best metals and leather and the most precisely crafted gaps and still would be a design disaster. The design of the instruments pod is particularly nasty, the asymmetric steering wheel unnecessary and the gauges below one of the nastiest looking radios in car history, unreadable.
Make mine a Mustang or a Challenger, I don't want this dude anywhere near me.
Whitie @ Jan 5th 2008 7:22AM
SVG - no need to bitch about something that clearly doesn't appeal to you - just don't buy it. No car is expected to appeal to everyone.
Conor @ Jan 4th 2008 4:11PM
Who let the monkeys use photoshop?
Pete @ Jan 4th 2008 4:13PM
Yeah, no crap!
Conor @ Jan 4th 2008 4:13PM
Oh. My bad guys! I thought this was GM stuff. The gray area at the bottom is what I'm reffering to. How'd that happen?
John Neff @ Jan 4th 2008 4:20PM
Settle down guys, it was the best I could do in ten minutes on 8 pics. If you can do it better, please do and send your versions to us at abresearch at gmail dot com and I'll put them in the gallery.
Pete @ Jan 4th 2008 4:37PM
I have a feeling you guys don't pay me as well as my current employer.
naggs @ Jan 4th 2008 4:18PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_X5uR7VC4M
TriShield @ Jan 4th 2008 4:30PM
As I posted yesterday the interior will look much richer when the production model is unveiled. I'm still glad Scott cleared that up officially though.
This car will be just as impressive as the Enclave, CTS and other recent GM releases if not more so.
TBlueMax @ Jan 4th 2008 4:50PM
Seeing the [factory] sunroof and an XM antenna with the modern/retro shape of the car seem completely incongruent. Not that I'm looking for bias-ply tires or anything but it just looks odd.
tek @ Jan 4th 2008 4:55PM
God damn, that is the worst photoshopping job I have ever seen. The Autoblog editors should not even have considered this post-worthy. All it is, is a blown up version of that smaller picture - and not even enlarged properly, what with the jpeg artifacting and pixelate edges. Next time, photochopper, use a vector based program to lay over a transparency, don't go wild with the paint brush (yes, I could do better, though I have actual work to do today...)
tek @ Jan 4th 2008 4:57PM
My apologies, I thought you had gotten those pictures from another source... not whipped them up in 10 minutes. If they were from off site... well I would have asked if Autoblog editors had gotten their coffee yet today!
WillDaThrill @ Jan 4th 2008 5:00PM
See John Neff's reply in Conor's post.
f3rg @ Jan 4th 2008 5:04PM
I've been a Honda guy from the time I bought my first car, but if GM keeps up this winning streak, I think my next car might be one of theirs, if not the Camaro.
Reality Check @ Jan 4th 2008 5:30PM
I bought a new CTS and it only has one problem, my Wife always takes it! You will love this car or the Malibu if you get one, they are not like their old stuff.....
Jason @ Jan 4th 2008 6:21PM
Everyone has been saying that for months, so I actually went and looked at a new Malibu. Leap years ahead of the old GM cars, but the interior is still total crap compared to the new Accord, hell even the last gen Accord.
Too bad the exterior of the new Accords is ugly as hell...
sk @ Jan 5th 2008 9:09AM
@Jason - My wife said exactly the opposite about the interiors. She thought the Accord interior is awful and the Malibu she liked. Her main complain with the Accord was the strange placement of some buttons. She found that the Malibu has a much better layout of all controls. She also found that the old Accord was better than the new one, but this is only because she is driving Honda's for the last 6 years.
Rick @ Jan 4th 2008 5:29PM
Cool Dodge Challenger.