Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
Reader Spy: Chevy Volt caught on set of Transformers 2
Spy Shot: Production interior of Chevy Volt (maybe)
Rumormill: Lexus LF-A... Stillborn?
Ford reveals 2010 Mustang badge
REPORT: Chrysler may sell Dodge Viper rather than kill it
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Nissan Murano
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Dodge Journey R/T
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Jeep Compass Sport 4x2
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Porsche Carrera S
First Drive: 2009 Honda Fit Sport
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadBy the Numbers: December 2007
(Page 1 of 1)
James @ Jan 3rd 2008 5:17PM
What do you expect with Fseries down 4 years straight?
Heard about the Tundra? They sold 196,000 Tundras. Thats sure to take a bite out of the Fseries.
No to mention the redesigned Silverado.
simianspeedster @ Jan 3rd 2008 8:26PM
Tundra sales were up 57% over 2006. I know the die hard bashers hate the Tundra, and it obviously had some first year issues, but 57% sales growth in the most competitive American auto segment speaks for itself.
Ford and Chrysler better start producing some decent bread and butter cars (like GM is doing with the new Malibu) to offset what are sure to be more losses in their core product lines, big trucks and SUVs, because Toyota is not standing still.
-SimianSpeedster