In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Chevrolet Malibu LT

click above for a high-res gallery of the 2008 Chevy Malibu LT
Once upon a time, General Motors' mid-sized models were the perennial top-selling passenger cars in America. Within my own lifetime, the Oldsmobile Cutlass topped the sales charts for years on end. But somewhere along the way, it all went pear-shaped for GM. Its cars went from being perpetual sales leaders into a perpetual sales decline. As GM's car sales tanked, the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord picked up the slack and are now considered the standard by which others in the class are measured.
The first signs of a real revival in the GM sedan lineup appeared in 2006 when the Saturn Aura debuted to decent reviews though somewhat lukewarm sales. Then, last January at the Detroit Auto Show, GM debuted two new production sedans, the Cadillac CTS and the car that just spent a week in the Autoblog Garage, the 2008 Chevrolet Malibu. The Malibu is here now, so let's find out what it's like to live with for a week.
Gallery: 2008 Chevrolet Malibu LT
All photos Copyright ©2007 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.

The Chevy Volt may represent the future of General Motors power-train technology, but before it can become a reality, GM needs a steady cash flow to fund development. That's the job of the Malibu. The last generation Malibu was bland with some slightly odd design details, while the one before that was just plain invisible. In this class, bland styling is not necessarily a bad thing as the Accord and Camry have clearly demonstrated over the past decade. However, the Japanese brands have backed up their innocuous looks with a reputation for impeccable build quality and levels of refinement that are considered well beyond their price point. That's something equivalent domestic models have been lacking until relatively recently.

When the latest edition of the Malibu debuted last year, it wore what is easily the best interpretation of Chevy's current corporate face with a large, horizontally-split grille. In addition to the bold-looking nose, virtually the whole car drew praise from onlookers at the 2007 Detroit Auto Show. The one possible weak spot was the back end that features taillights which still look like something of an after thought. The rest of the car is so good, however, that the back lights are easily forgotten. The car has handsome proportions with a long, sleek roof-line that draws some obvious inspiration from the Volkswagen Phaeton, among other cars.

The relative absence of surface detailing serves to point out how well Chevrolet got this basic look just right. The details that appear upon close inspection also show the thought that was put into the new Malibu. Even on this slightly above entry-level LT, nothing on the outside of the car looks cheap. The 225/50R17 tires and wheels aren't undersized, fill the wheel wells nicely and sit flush with the surrounding body. Those attractive five spoke wheels? They are actually plastic wheel covers on steel wheels. They may be less expensive than aluminum, but they sure don't look cheap. The turn signal repeaters on the front fenders also give a European touch. Even the little Chevy bow-tie molded into the rear signal lens is a subtle reminder that someone was paying attention.


My wife has never been a GM fan, but when she started seeing the Malibu in TV commercials, she couldn't believe it was a Chevrolet. For the first time in the 14 years we've been together, she actually wanted to check out a GM car. We think this type of reaction is happening all over the U.S. when people see the new Malibu for the first time.
The glass moon-roof on our test unit didn't get much use during the cold pre-Christmas weather around Ann Arbor, but when I tried it out, I noticed it opens up on the outside of the roof so that it doesn't detract from interior headroom. Upon opening the doors of the Malibu, it was immediately clear that this car is a huge step forward for GM mid-sized cars. Compared to the Dodge Avenger and Caliber SRT-4 that we've reviewed in recent months, the doors felt solid and closed with a tighter seal than even the new Accord. The cloth covered seats in the 1LT model weren't quite as good as those in the new Accord, but are still very comfortable and supportive.

The interior of the Malibu is a revelation for a mainstream domestic car. Even on this low-end model, the quality of the materials was excellent. The appearance and feel of the plastics was of a higher quality than either the Toyota Highlander Hybrid or Jeep Grand Cherokee we've driven in recent months, both of which were more than twice the cost of the Malibu. The steering wheel rim was thick and covered in a rubberized plastic that offered a good grip and feel. The 2LT and LTZ trim levels have a leather-wrapped wheel, but even this one felt better than the skinny leather wheel in the new Highlander.
One of the first things we looked for in the Malibu was the alignment of the trim on the door panels and dashboard. Every Saturn Aura we've looked at had a misalignment between the door and dash trim, a point we've made sure to mention to GM. A rep indicated that the company was aware of this issue and working to address it before Malibu production started. At least on this example, they succeeded. The interior has plenty of storage including wide pockets in the doors, a deep bin under the center armrest and a compartment in the center of the dash top. The backs of the front seats are also scooped out to provide extra legroom for rear seat passengers, and the back seat is nicely cushioned and comfortable. It folds down 60/40, but the thick padding prevents the seat back from folding completely flat. The latest Accord has grown quite a bit and the extra two inches of width it has over the Malibu can easily be felt in the back seat if you add a third passenger. The rear compartment of the Malibu is great for two passengers but a tight squeeze for a trio.
Another place where the Malibu has a distinct advantage over the latest Accord is interior sound levels. The Chevy is exceptionally quiet, especially for a car with a base price just shy of $20,000. Even the 2.4L EcoTec four-cylinder was well muted.

Other nice touches in the Malibu include pale green ambient lighting behind the door handles and next to the dome light switches. The lighting was just enough to allow occupants to find the handles in the dark without fumbling around. The trunk lid also has four bar link hinges that don't intrude on space the way the goose-necks do on the Accord. It's small touches like these that convey to the buyer that bean counters didn't build this car.
The aforementioned 2.4L EcoTec four-cylinder engine had plenty of power for moving the 3,400-pound Malibu, although the four-speed automatic transmission was partly to blame for the 21 mpg test average. Most of our time in the new Chevy was spent driving around town while Christmas shopping, which meant we logged a lower than normal percentage of highway miles during the week before Christmas. Mileage should be improved next spring when the four-speed will be supplanted by GM's new six-speed unit as the company ramps up production of the new transmission. The electrically-assisted steering was nicely weighted and provided decent feedback. The brake pedal feel was excellent and the four-corner disc brakes responded well to inputs while being easy to modulate. The Ann Arbor area got a fairly healthy mid-December dumping of snow, which provided good opportunities to test the traction and stability control. Thankfully, both systems worked smoothly and consistently, particularly the stability control. It just kept the car going where the steering wheel was pointed. The back end stayed put with the ESC warning light flashing quietly on occasion, but there was no additional feedback through the steering wheel or extra alarms. The suspension was well sprung and damped, absorbing bumps and frost heaves without ever feeling floaty or harsh.

Overall, the Malibu is easily the best mid-size car from General Motors in my lifetime and probably yours, and it's one of the best cars available in its class today. Even the entry level model doesn't look or feel like a Hertz or Avis special. The ebony interior is perhaps a bit too monochromatic, although those who have small kids with dirty hands might prefer it over the lighter two-tone gray interior treatment. The 1LT model GM provided us prices out at $22,230 including the sun-roof. Moving up to the 2LT model starting at $23,135 nets you a leather-covered steering wheel and shifter, seat warmers, aluminum wheels and other standard amenities. With all that equipment, the 2LT Malibu is a real bargain and a truly viable competitor to the Camry and Accord.
All photos Copyright ©2007 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.













Reader Comments (Page 4 of 7)
NYCbloke 1:37PM (12/31/2007)
I actually test drove the Malibu LT this weekend and was VERY impressed. It drove much nicer then my mothers Camry, and I was shocked at what a quiet, smooth ride it had. Skip the grey or black interior and go for the cocoa/cashmere scheme - a knockout interior at 22K.
I actually think this car looks awesome – real road presence – in my eyes the rear 3/4 is its best angle.
Well done GM - I'll be the first person in my family in 26 years to purchase a domestic automobile.
You nailed this one.
Reply
cody 1:39PM (12/31/2007)
I don't like the back. Typical bland detroit tail lights. Are they going to go back to the board flat rear end like the Vega? It looks like they were doing really well and almost had it done and someone walke in and said "Ok, times up, put down your pencils" Someone just scribbled in some taillights on the unfinished rear.
Reply
Killenmedpirogen 1:44PM (12/31/2007)
I don´t like the front or the back or the middle. But the sunroof is a killer!
Reply
tio 1:51PM (12/31/2007)
It looks better than the out going one thats for sure. I like the dark interior. And OMG there is no tacky fake wood!!! its amazing! And look! no shiny plastic! Sorry Armor all lovers. You lose! I'll echo the rear end styling. Needs maybe a larger license plate opening like the Impala from a few years ago and different tail lights. Something to break up the bland rear. The front 3/4 of the car is a knock out.
Reply
oby 1:52PM (12/31/2007)
"Great car! I recommend this vehicle to everyone that asks my opinion on what sedan to buy. "
Really now! I suppose you can see into the future and you know how reliable it will be and that it will not be a garage queen and a sink hole for money like most of the rest of the GM crap. I wish I had that skill. This car has something that the Camry, Accord does not have, something that is free on all GM cars. It will start falling apart in about 3 years. I know a guy who just got a G5, a replacement for a Sunfire that fell apart which in turn was a replacement for an 88 Honda Civic which my son now owns that is running very well. I was telling an auto mechanic about this and just asked him what he thought about the G5/Cobalt cars and his answer was, 'I love em' those cars keep me and my family well fed' He added, 'it's not small stuff either, those cars need frequent big ticket repairs.' Some of you GM fanboys need to wake up and smell the coffee.
Reply
Julius 2:03PM (12/31/2007)
As if all the other car companies get a free pass on this - to wit: Toyota had a couple cars bumped off the Consumer Reports' recommended list for quality issues as well.
And even CR comments that quality from all manufacturers overall has improved - with some GM's coming to the top of the list, too.
And besides, everyone's got a story of such-and-such car dying early, or some-other car making past $200k miles with only gas put in.
Frylock350 2:14PM (12/31/2007)
Maybe you should smell some of the same coffee. Toyotas as of late haven't been worth the sheetmetal they're stamped from. Hondas are still good cars, I'll give you that. I'm actually amazed that Civic hadn't disintegrated from rust yet.
I can't speak for small GM cars but I've owned plenty of large ones and they've been amazing. I have a 91 Caprice Wagon with 159k on it and we have an 83 Delta88 with 203k on that's still daily driven. I recently purchased a 2007 Avalanche and though I only have 31k on it not, it hasn't given me a single issue. My Caprice has been stellar, needing few non-maintenance repairs and still returns ~25mpg on the highway @73mph (its amazing what a good air filter + a light foot will do). Nothing has fallen off the Caprice and it still does not have a single dash rattle. The tailgate window pistons squeak now, but it doesn't make any other noises.
This isn't pertinent to everyone but I'm a DIY mechanic and GM vehicles are very easy to work on. The layout under the hood isn't cluttered (Ford) or so compressed/compacted you need to pull half the stuff off for a simple job (Toyota/Honda). They're simple and spacious under the hood, a mechanic's dream. The parts are easy to find too. Not so with a VW.
Rene Curry 2:17PM (12/31/2007)
Oby, I ask you the same question "Really now, you can see into the future and know it will fall apart in 3 years?"
The Camry and Accord are now on notice that they are not the only game in town especially when compared on value.
And yes, I hold the Honda Accord in high regard as a well engineered and quality vehicle. It is just that it will be hard for them to justify premium pricing going forward.
Big dawg 5:25PM (12/31/2007)
@ OBY
I f you like the rice burners so much maybe you shouldnt even be reading this blog. F**ing idiot! You guys that agree with this fool are jap fan boys and cannot give credit where credit is due. This car will kick the crap out of an Accord or Camry in due time.
caddy dave 6:35PM (12/31/2007)
Oby, why is it that everytime there is a post on GM you come here and expell your hatred and lies?
For one, G5 and Cobalt needing big repairs. Like what? And then back it up with proof. Liar. In your context, the mechanic is obviouly an independent garage owner, however, since they are too new to most likely be out of warranty, if needed, owners would be much more inclined to take the car back to the dealer. If they were the junks that you claim them to be, I think we would hear more about it than just from you.
As for the three year lifespan you claim, why is it that percentage of cars built, you see far more ten year old domestics still running than Toyota's or Honda's? But I digress, you said it so it must be gospel. But then again, you've also said in recent posts that GM was in bankruptcy.
Why do you bother to post on here? No one believes you anymore.
Rick 3:57PM (12/31/2007)
Fill the black voids in the grill and bumper, looks like they ran out of sheet metal or something. And please, PLEASE, kill the vette, neon, flat as a wall tail light truck rear end! That kills the entire car for me (along with the grill). But this is easly the best US car in sometime. Not much better then the ugly Accord, but better than the ugly Camry. New Altima design with it's exessively large tail lights and bloated rear end leave plenty to desire and loses to the Malibu.
However, when the 2009 Mazda6 comes out, game over.
Reply
JGN 2:09PM (12/31/2007)
This is a huge improvement on previous iterations of the Malibu. GM is finally starting to listen to its customers. You can thank all of those people who started buying Hondas and Toyotas and told GM that they would not be back until GM started building better cars. Hey Presto! GM is starting to build better cars.
All in all, I would call this a good start though. The engines don't quite match up with either Honda or Toyota, GM needs more development there, but they've come a long way. The Accord and the Camry have become more aggressively styled in 2008, and the new Malibu has done a great job with that.
Consumers are going to have concerns though, before jumping back into a domestic car. Namely, concerns about reliability and durability. Is the new Malibu built to be a car you can drive for 15 years or over 200,000 miles with relatively few problems. Is the new Malibu going to hold together past 3-5 years, let alone 10-15 years? Are parts like the water pump, or transmission going to fail years before one in a Toyota/Honda would?
Still, I'm really happy to see GM headed in the right direction. Consumers have different expectations for their vehicles in modern times and it seems like GM has finally caught onto that.
Reply
Chris Vitale 3:00PM (12/31/2007)
JGN...How do the engines not match up? I haven't heard much on the 4 cyl, but as far as the V6 goes, it had the least horsepower but stil pulled off the second best acceleration times in Edmunds testing, second only to the Camry(which doesn't even have a chassis up to the task of all its HP). I also hear it is quiet and smooth.
As far as reliability goes, most surveys are showing that all domestics have made great strides in that area. Especially with Buick tieing Lexus for the #1 spot in reliability. And with all the recent recalls, engine sludge problems, and transmission problems in Toyota's, their reputation is sure to diminish along with their declining green image if things like that aren't taken care of soon.
Just asking, not trying to start a war here...
J.Crew 5:52PM (12/31/2007)
GM's powertrains (engine and transmissions) have always been a strong point for their vehicles. The areas where GM fell short were the exterior styling and interior quality. Small things were cheap or not there at all with little attention to detail. This car corrects all of that while having the same quality in the engine and transmission that GM's have been known for. Good job GM!
WetheSheeple 2:24AM (1/01/2008)
To everyone who thinks GM is all crap, well answer these questions. Why does BMW buy GM transmissions for their own cars? Why would Ferrari use their Magnetic Ride control in their quarter million dollar Ferraris if the technology was 'junk'?
GM powertrains have in my opinion for the past 10+ years been pretty strong. My family has owned many GM cars over the past 10 years, and they all have been pretty darn good. No major problems. It's good to see GM address their styling and interiors, which was 2 of their biggest shortcomings.
Travis 2:50PM (12/31/2007)
my biggest issues with this car have zero to do with the car itself (other than it's a bland, mid-size sedan) but rather with the fact that if there's ANY issues with Chevy, they'll turn around in a heartbeat and dump vehicles to rental companies and kill the resale value. Or if vehicles aren't selling well, they'll offer HUGE deals just to get them off the lot, killing resale value.
Reply
Ethan 2:45PM (12/31/2007)
Hey Sam, most of the picture links are broken.
Reply
Dad 2:53PM (12/31/2007)
Frylock350 "This isn't pertinent to everyone but I'm a DIY mechanic and GM vehicles are very easy to work on."
Yes it is very important. Thanks for the comment.
Reply
why not the LS2/LS7? 3:08PM (12/31/2007)
Thanks Sam and autoblog, for posting something interesting to read in this down week.
I do want to mention the pictures don't work though.
Reply
Ian 3:14PM (12/31/2007)
There is quite a fuss being made about this new Malibu and indeed it appears to be a nice car.
Butwhat's the difference between the Malibu and the Saturn Aura which has been out almost a year now?
Reply