Filed under: Time Warp, Etc., Ford
CarDomain Find of the Day: V8, mid-engined Ford Festiva

click above image for gallery
Festiva, mid-mounted V8 – okay, we're with you. Front wheel drive? Uh, sounds like a fine way to blow a lot of dollars adapting components in order to send the power to the wrong pair of 13-inch tires. No Festiva conversion will ever top the SHOgun, which planted the Taurus SHO's Yamaha V6 where the rear seat used to be in the diminutive Kia derivative. CarDomain member TheOne-Originals has exceeded the SHOgun's cylinder count by squeezing a small-block Chevy V8 behind the front seats. The power runs forward, with a Turbo Hydramatic transmission coupled to a BMW limited slip differential. Customized Audi driveshafts are responsible for transmitting torque to the teeny tiny tires.
We like the exhaust stacks that stick through the roof, as well as the Mad-Max patina the whole project wears. The SHOgun may have been more finely finished, but this car wouldn't have a problem drawing at least as large a crowd. It might not be tremendously amusing in a torrential downpour, but being able to crack that four-barrel open and instantly boil the front tires has its own charm. Our favorite quote from the car's description? "The stock brakes definitely need upgrading, but I'll get to that later." Or not. The car might kill its builder first. We can only imagine how evil the torque steer might be, and mid-engined cars are notorious for being wicked near their moment of polar inertia. A sleeper econobox with twice the cylinder count with which it came, mercenary unmuffled exhaust, and the pending addition of a flamethrower system for the exhaust? Yeah, that would definitely entertain us.
Thanks for the tip, Rob!
[Source: CarDomain]

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Harrison 8:01PM (12/25/2007)
Mid-engine front wheel drive?
That would be a MF configuration. So in other words, that would be one bad MF-er.
Reply
PandaBeat 8:29PM (12/25/2007)
Incredibly retarded.
Reply
RLQ 2:20AM (12/28/2007)
passion
Dave 8:53PM (12/25/2007)
Ridiculous.
Reply
S1500 10:04PM (12/25/2007)
It's not a clean mod. For all the work they did in the back, they sure left the cockpit a mess.
Reply
Anti-believer 12:42AM (12/26/2007)
What a waste!
I meant the engine.
Reply
Ken 2:44AM (12/26/2007)
Todd - see, I am not the only one out there who wants a mid-engine, FWD car ;)
Reply
arcel 7:56AM (12/26/2007)
another vehicle on the way to the junk shop...
http://cars.ozfreeonline.com
Reply
calebe 11:02AM (12/26/2007)
humms "to much time on my hands"
Reply
dave0mary 11:15AM (12/26/2007)
The weather in these pics, and other stupid mods, always seems to be warm. It's warm in the Tennessee hills right? LOL
Reply
Calguy 12:22PM (12/26/2007)
Inspired my the mad (but friggin HOT) Renault 5 Turbo?
Reply
Derek 1:42PM (12/26/2007)
All the disadvantages of front engine, RWD, and FWD rolled into one. Whaaaaa???
Couldn't they at least have found a TH425 or 325 and driven the wheels under the engine?
Oh, and just what is this: "and mid-engined cars are notorious for being wicked near their moment of polar inertia" supposed to mean?
Reply
Dan Roth 1:57PM (12/26/2007)
The polar moment of inertia thing means that when you have too little driver piloting too much car, they can snap into a spin *really* abruptly
chrisdavis 4:55PM (12/26/2007)
I don't get it either. Mid-engined cars have a low polar moment of inertia, which is why they handle so much better than front or rear-engined cars. They are known for NOT swapping ends.
Dan Roth 5:23PM (12/26/2007)
Guys - I guess I should have explained it more in the post. Mid-engined cars get hairy near their limit because that limit is usually higher than what you could pull off with another layout. In other words, when you get in trouble with a mid-engined car, you're *really* in trouble - kind of one of those "it's stable, till it whips around" kinda thing.
chrisdavis 12:00PM (12/28/2007)
But they don't "whip around". That's what 911s and muscle cars are known for, not F430s and MR2s. Mid-engined cars maintain their yaw angle while losing grip and sliding off line whereas front- and rear-engined cars spin around the center of their mass.
Derek 3:50PM (12/28/2007)
The thing is, you are never near the "moment of polar inertia". Polar moment of inertia is a property, like weight. You can't get near it, it just is. That is what I was referring to.
Having driven and ridden in a few mid engine cars, they are more *controllable*. Low PMI means that it is easier to get into a spin, but also easier to get out of it. High PMI means it takes more to get into a spin (which might be mistaken for being more stable) but it also takes alot more to get out of it.
Thing is, most drivers go out to have some fun and are used to hanging out the tail on their high PMI car. Get in a low PMI car and now what they do to start a spin/slide is WAY more than necessary, resulting in a huge spin that may be beyond your capability to recover from. That doesn't make the car unstable, just the driver...
BTW: musclecars are only good at swapping ends when the drivers right foot is too heavy ;) Being nose-heavy, their tendency is to understeer.
Dan Roth 4:27PM (12/28/2007)
I humbly submit that you guys have schooled me on my lack of understanding :)
PandaBeat 5:28PM (12/26/2007)
Incredibly retarded.
Reply