<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow, MB screwed the pooch on this car. Still comes off as a chick car, but too ugly to appeal to chicks. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 9:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[Damn, it's STILL ugly. Give me a TT or a Boxster. Hell, I'd even be satisfied with a Solstice GXP.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mazda 3s]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 9:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[Perhaps, that is the best looking small coupe on the market. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Me Too]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 9:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just another example of how no manufacturer comes even close to M-B in terms of design. Some (Lexus and Hyundai) to be exact) attempt to copy - but if you improve perfection all you get at the end is an ugly cheap-looking replica (Lexus SC and LS)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[I want one]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 10:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is anyone else reminded of Joe Camel?<br><br><a href="http://images.encarta.msn.com/xrefmedia/sharemed/targets/images/pho/0007f/0007fae7.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://images.encarta.msn.com/xrefmedia/sharemed/targets/images/pho/0007f/0007fae7.jpg</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chopper Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 10:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hahaha. Is it smiling at me? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[3seriesisking]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 1:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, they did a good job of mimicking the front of an F1 car.<br><br>No, that is not a good thing. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 10:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[I kind of like it.  Not $40K like it, but I do not find it ugly or offensive.  If one of you guys wants to give it to me for Christmas, I'd drive it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 10:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[It looks like estrogen is now standard and the testosterone package was deleted.  It'd make a great tie in to sell it with kotex.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[notYou]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, Mercedes can't keep up with the jones. So they give up and go extremely cammy. Very un-german.<br>It would have been cool to see a 4.1 liter V6 off of the 5.5V8.<br>and how come they are still using that wholly obsolete 3 valve 5.4 V8? Use the new 4 valve 5.5 in the SLK AMG<br>and how about dropping the SLK280 name, it is a 3 liter engine.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MikeW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 11:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[BMW is laughing and laughing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xcountryflyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[Or not. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[3seriesisking]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 1:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[The above post was supposed to be a reply to Metoo]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[3seriesisking]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 1:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[No one's holding a candle to the new BMW 1-series when it comes to the "best-looking small coupe in the market" category. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[clevershark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 1:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[The only model that looks decent enough in SLK is the 55 AMG and even that depends on angle.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SPF]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 2:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[I predict a two year run time for this particular model; just long enough to modify that crappy front end.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 1:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[A supercharged 4cyl that makes 184hp?  I'm no horsepower freak, but seems kinda low, doesn't it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 1:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[This car looks a bit feminine in pictures but because of its wide stance and pushed out wheels, it looks powerful with a touch of flowing lines. There's no harm in having a touch of feminine design. It makes it more stylish. If you have to have masculine design 24/7, you have serious issues. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aetius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 1:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[This car has a schlong nose and a fat ass. Two visual treatments I think the MB used to macho-up from the former iteration. Ooops and ooops. It's a dog. Not sexy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Calguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2007 3:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/21/officially-official-2009-mercedes-benz-slk/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jesus Christ, this car just gets uglier and uglier.<br><br>I think the only premium car uglier than this on the market right now is the Lexus SC, but it's damn close.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2007 7:02AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>