Filed under: In the Autoblog Garage, Minivans/MPVs, Mazda
In the Autoblog Garage: 2007 Mazda5 Touring

The Tutors have been waiting months to get a Mazda5 in the Autoblog Garage. The car-like minivan has been on the our family shopping list since we knew we were adding an extra person to the house. Based on the Mazda3 platform, the 5 promised a sedan ride with family-size space for parents on a budget. That, in my mind, is the perfect vehicle.
Our strato blue tester was a Touring model with 17" wheels, cloth seats, automatic climate control, and moonroof. The only optional equipment was satellite radio. The sticker on the window listed a base price of $19,780 with a $430 charge for the Sirius receiver and a delivery charge of $595, for a grand total of $20,375.
Continue reading about the Mazda5 Touring after the jump.
All photos Copyright ©2007 Chris Tutor / Weblogs, Inc.

If you travel with a human younger than 21, you carry loads of toys. And those myriad toys gotta be stowed somewhere, or else you get action figures lurking beneath the accelerator and baby dolls flailing away loudly on hollow plastic in back. Mazda's designers have no kids. None. I am convinced of this because the Mazda5 has the small-item storage of a Kawasaki . OK, sure, there is a small cubby hole in the very back, and a little mesh baggy thing suspended between the two center seats, and a shallow indentation beneath each of those same seats' cushions. But you try explaining to a bored toddler while doing 70 down the interstate, why he can't have his coloring book because he and his child seat are sitting on it. Oh, and the driver and passenger share what seemed to be a vertical bread box between the front seats. It must have been a foot deep and about six inches wide, perfectly suited for umbrellas. Or maybe rolled up newspapers. The tiny glove box was completely taken up by the car's manual.
What few storage bins the car did have were unlined hard plastic which meant the loose change up front rattled over every bump, the small items in back knocked about with every turn and the umbrella by my elbow bounced around wildly. Come on Mazda. How much could rubber liners have cost?
And that's about as passionately positive or negative I can get about the Mazda5. Otherwise, it's not a bad vehicle. It just seemed every time my wife and I found a feature we liked about the Mazda, we found a negative to balance it out. Take the interior, for example. Behind the two front seats, there was ample seating for five, and with those seats folded, enough cargo room to move a college senior from dorm to apartment. The balancing negative came with driver and passenger seats. Despite being an average 5'10", I felt cramped behind the wheel. Push the seat close enough to properly work the clutch, and my knees were scraping the plastic beneath the instrument cluster. The passenger seat wasn't much better. With it pushed back to its limits, my 5'4" wife still had very little knee and foot room. We've also heard complaints from some current 5 owners about the lack of center armrests, HVAC outlets for rear passengers, and the lack of a power port in back.
Our Mazda5 had the optional Sirius satellite radio, which worked just as it should. We just wish Mazda would give its customers more than a one-line LED readout. It was almost impossible to change satellite channels while driving, and a pain in the rear when parked.
Safety is as you would expect. Disc brakes on all wheels, air bags in front, and front side, as well as side bags for all four rear passengers.
Performance is surprising for a vehicle of this size. Our loaner had the 5-speed manual attached to the standard 2.2 liter 153 hp engine. We didn't have a chance against a Mazda3 on which the 5 is based, but we'd have a good shot at taking most other minivans on the road. Automatic-equipped 5s with steering-wheel-mounted paddle-shifters bring almost the same level of go, and, in our opinion, are better suited for family-hauling than is the manual. Our only real gripe about the manual is the placement of the shifter. We wouldn't expect a stubby little Miata-like shifter in a minivan, but it was a sometimes uncomfortable reach for the stick way over there by the radio. We got pretty near the estimated EPA highway number of 27 mpg on a long drive to New Orleans, but only about 19 mpg in city driving.


Seating for six is nice to have, but sometimes you're hauling more cargo than people. The 5 makes that fairly easy. All rear seats fold flat, giving you room for almost 71 cubic feet of stuff, as compared to a miniscule 4 cu. ft. with all the seats up. The seats fold easily from either of the two sliding side doors, but to get them back up requires opening the rear hatch. Not a big problem, just an annoyance. With just the rearmost seats folded, we were able to load groceries and our extra-large stroller with space left over.
Child seats can be installed in any of the rear four seats, and installation was unremarkably easy. The dual sliding rear doors made loading and unloading of a two-year-old very easy in the second row, and the Mazda5 had no problem passing the stroller test with the third row seats down or up. It held our full-size Graco and groceries either way.
Some complaints about the 5 will be addressed in the upcoming redesign expected in late 2008. Rear passengers get HVAC outlets and armrests, and the dashboard gets a makeover with an auxiliary audio input. We don't know yet whether storage issues or seating problems will be addressed. That means Mazda5 shoppers should be able to find some good deals on leftover 2007 models, or if they're patient, will get an updated mini-minivan in a few months. For those not ready for a minivan, but who still need lots of space, the 5 is one of a very few cars that can deliver for less than $25,000.
All photos Copyright ©2007 Chris Tutor / Weblogs, Inc.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Luis 12:16PM (12/18/2007)
If you're shopping for minivans, this is a great option. The only item that I think might keep someone from purchasing might be the small powertrain. I wonder how well it would do if fully loaded...
Reply
freckles 12:23PM (12/18/2007)
even though i don't have children yet i occasionally need to haul 5-6 people at a time. i also wonder how the powertrain would do if the van was loaded. to me this would be a perfect option between a pickup truck (which the bed i would rarely use) and a midsize car
Brandon 1:42PM (12/19/2007)
We have the Mazda5 with the manual, and we think it's pretty great. There is no equivalent car on the US market, so while it may not be perfect, its benefits certainly outweigh the downsides. I love being able to shift for myself, and the flexibility to carry two kids in carseats and still be able to pick up the grandparents from the airport, all in a car that's shorter than the 1996 Camry we have.
I think the cloth seats have proven pretty durable. The lack of storage allows me to enforce the "keep the crap out of the car rule".
The mileage just plain sucks, though. No four cylinder should make less than 30 mpg on the highway.
Eric77TA 12:23PM (12/18/2007)
I really like the 5, but the one thing that concerns me is it seems that the mileage should be better. It doesn't get much better mileage than the full size minivans. Which really aren't "mini" anymore - not when the new Caravan is the size of a Tahoe. The 5 is actually close to the size of the first generation Caravan. So it shouldn't be a "mini minivan," but rather just a "minivan" while the new Caravan should just be a "front wheel drive van."
Reply
starlightmica 12:35PM (12/18/2007)
Correction: NA Mazda5's with the slushbox don't have paddle shifters; there's no 2nd row 12V power jack but there is one behind the 3rd row.
08's are now arriving at dealerships, my brother bought one last week. Storage is no different except the console between the front seats is smaller due to AC ducting to the 2nd row. ESC, Plus One (7th) seat, power sliding doors & hatch remain unavailable in NA.
Reply
pmgk 12:47PM (12/18/2007)
I don't like the (2+2+2) setting.
The oversea version get a (2+3+2) setting:
http://www.mazda.fr/NR/rdonlyres/AEC5EFF0-FEBD-4D7A-8A20-5AD5AADBBB46/0/practicality_03_large.jpg
Austin 12:37PM (12/18/2007)
i hope Ford will bring its sister , S-Max, over as well
Reply
MoonRover 12:45PM (12/18/2007)
Cheap frabric on the seat, won't last with kids also stains easily.
Reply
Rick 6:02PM (12/18/2007)
My 5 is two years old now with two kids (toddler and infant). Seats are fine. We are extremely happy with ours.
mike 12:52PM (12/18/2007)
Why would you give a car that will drive children a manual transmition?
Reply
seoultrain 1:06PM (12/18/2007)
is a parent shifting a manual unsuitable for children? I don't see your argument.
epilonious 1:08PM (12/18/2007)
because it costs less and gets better mileage?
And if your small children are in the front seat able to access the shifter or left in the car without adult supervision then you are a bad parent?
Luis 1:12PM (12/18/2007)
I don't know why they wouldn't give it a manual TRANSMITION. I do know it'd be fun to give it a manual TRANSMISSION when dad has to drive it.
AelHues 1:34PM (12/18/2007)
What a silly question. Am I not allowed to enjoy driving just because I frequently have my 3 kids in the car? When I bought my 5 a year and a half ago, I had 4 primary criteria: manual transmission, solid dynamic handling, 3 rows of seats, under $20k. There is no other vehicle that even fits, sold in America.
As far as this review, how can you have a review, and not really even comment on how much fun it is to drive? Sure, it's not filled to overflowing with useful storage. Sure, you can't stuff 27 kids in it. But for someone like me, who enjoys driving, doesn't want to have to deal with a kid sitting in the middle seat, needs to occasionally haul some big stuff, and needs to do it all on a budget, there is nothing comparable to the 5.
JR 1:51PM (12/18/2007)
I don't get the kid hauler != stick argument, either. My dad's old VW Vanagon was a manual and it was a great family van.
Andrew 12:57PM (12/18/2007)
I wanted to like the Mazda5 because of the manual transmission, good fuel economy, and price relative to other vans. But it's just too small. There's not enough leg room up front, or enough cargo space behind the third row. I also wonder if that 4-banger would be able to handle a full load.
It's odd that the glovebox is small. The glovebox in the Mazda3 is enormous. And the 3 has plenty of leg room up front. I guess you just can't stretch a small car platform into a "people mover" without some major compromises.
Reply
psarhjinian 2:30PM (12/18/2007)
The front leg room is this vehicle's Achilles' heel. If Mazda could get just two more inches of track travel, I would have bought one, even if it cuts into the second row room.
Being able to drop the seat an inch would be nice, too.
seoultrain 1:02PM (12/18/2007)
yes, this is a family car, but the whole point of this car is that you can have fun driving with your kids in tow. Not a single word about driving dynamics (which are better than any alternative) in this review. Hell, the standard manual is a welcome change to this vanilla, how-many-cupholders-and-cubbies-can-you-fit-in-a-rolling-box segment. It's not perfect, but its appeal in performance outweighs its flaws. Sadly, few people will buy one, which is why the mpv is now gone, too.
Reply
Aetius 1:30PM (12/18/2007)
I agree. The reviewer was looking at the 5 froma Odyssey/Sienna/Caravan perspective. THis is simply a enlarged Mazda3 with sliding doors, built for families with maybe 2 kids and who want a small, yet fun to drive and good-looking 'van'. Not everyone wants to drive the USS Abraham Lincoln aka the Odyssey!
John R 1:10PM (12/18/2007)
Mazdaspeed 5. Thats all I gotta say. At a price maybe $6k over sticker, it would definetly be competitive compared to the V6 Odyessey, Quest or Caravan. And might be faster too.
Reply