<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where's the LS7?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frylock350]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 9:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[Precisely what I was thinking.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Raul N. Correa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 11:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why don't you try reading:<br><br>"Each engine must be available in a regular-production, U.S.-specification model on sale no later than the first quarter of 2008 in a vehicle priced no more than $54,000, a price cap indexed to the average cost of a new vehicle."<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 11:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[Amen, that was exactly my first thought]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[srDRIVEN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 11:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, what an amazing idea.  Large displacement pushrod over head valve motors.  Effing genius.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 1:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed. Smaller, lighter, cheaper, more powerful, more fuel efficient engine than a bulky DOHC engine.<br><br>Thinking outside the box.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 5:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[More powerful: not always, more fuel efficient: not always, lighter: not always. You fail.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ambientFLIER]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 8:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[Subaru "boxer" engine. turbocharged 2.5L (used in the WRX and STI Imprezza Models)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam mc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 9:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sti engine vs any of the us car motors, Wards out of its damn mind!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EJ25RUN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 9:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[2.5l Turbocharged Boxer 4?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 9:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[Argh, ya beat me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 9:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[There's a few others that deserve recognition, but overall I think its a good list.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Syco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 9:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ford mustang motor.  Hasn't that been out forever...  GM's best motor i think is the 2.0L DI turbo, and yes where is the sti motor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 9:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[Since 2005]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 10:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[What about GM 2.0L DI Turbo????]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BLS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 9:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seriously 261HP and 31mpg (2007-style) doesn't work for Ward's? I guess they're bigger fans of the Ford mod motor.<br><br>Ridiculous.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 12:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[what about the F22C running in the current S2000?<br>it may not go to 9000rpm anymore but it's still an miracle of engineering. 237hp, normally aspirated inline-4. c'mon!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 9:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[Honda's high reving 4 bangers are pretty amazing.  I love high rev engines.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oracle99]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 9:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[And for that matter, where's the other high specific output motors, such as the new v-8 in the M3, the motor from porsche's GT3, and the K20xx in the civic si? Anyone can get 100+hp/L using boost, but it takes some talent to do it naturally aspirated. <br><br>Any list that doesn't include any Honda 4-bangers is discredited in my book.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cheezwiz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 10:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/wards-announces-ten-best-engines-list/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was thinking Porsche as well, but:<br><br>Each engine must be available in a regular-production, U.S.-specification model on sale no later than the first quarter of 2008 in a vehicle priced no more than $54,000, a price cap indexed to the average cost of a new vehicle.<br><br>The 2.7L Boxster engine might fit into this price range, but it's nothing to write home about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DJWhiplash2001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 10:43AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>