<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought the Pacifica was Chrysler's first crossover vehicle.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TriShield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 11:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA[My thoughts exactly. I guess it didn't take very long for the Pacifica to be forgotten.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 11:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA[It was and the 2004 MY was freaking awesome until they decontented the hell out of it. <br><br>The only reason they are killing it is simply because it doesn't share enough parts with current Chrysler vehicles. It's just too German. <br><br>From what I am seeing on my end...Cerberus really is adding some content to the vehicles and FAST. <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pacifica was called a "sports tourer" by Chrysler. It wasn't at all sporty, but I guess you could go touring in it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA["The only reason they are killing it is simply because it doesn't share enough parts with current Chrysler vehicles. It's just too German."<br><br>The Pacifica?  It's all homegrown; it was based on the Caravan.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 1:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah not so much buddy. The navigation, rear suspension, and several other interior components (seat adjusters on the door) were Mercedes pieces. <br><br>I could get a whole list of things from former product planners CS, but I'm not going to bother. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA[I did forget about the suspension pieces, but "it's too German" is a looooong way from a modified RS platform with some bespoke M-B parts added.<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrysler_Pacifica" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrysler_Pacifica</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds like a Neon replacement is coming! hahah]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 12:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, they call the Magnum a "sports tourer" as well but they weren't fooling anyone.  <br><br>I too remember when the Pacifica debuted.  It was a very rich, expensive looking vehicle and had Chrysler's best modern interior design and materials.  Then they cheapened it to oblivion and Chrysler interiors have gone downhill ever since.  <br><br>It's a shame they've given up on the Pacifica, it was ahead of it's time and deserves a redesign.  The Journey looks horrible.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TriShield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 12:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA[They better go develop some gas savers quick. The crappy Caliber certainly isn't the best miser.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xcountryflyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA[most likely, current owners arent planning on being around that long, so they will make noises and movements like they are working on it, but no cares about progress.  <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[geo.stewart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 1:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if anyone at Chrysler has considered the turbine/electric engine as a possible hybrid?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 2:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA[what was the name of that '60's movie that had the Chrysler turbine car in it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[calebe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 3:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just hope this doesn't mean they're planning to kill off their performance models, just when Chrysler was finally starting to build vehicles (like the Challenger SRT8) that I would actually buy!<br><br>And apparently THIS is why the Journey doesn't come with a decent powerplant...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[500]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 8:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/13/chrysler-says-it-will-meet-new-cafe-standards/</guid><description><![CDATA[A bunch of us at a Jeep Patriot forum are drooling over the diesel mileage available outside the U.S. But word apparently the U.S. has the toughest diesel emission standards in the world and we don't get the next-gen CRD until 2010!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Fotos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 10:26PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>