New system combines features of OnStar and Sync
We're not going out on a limb by saying that the future of in-car technology is connecting all our electronic detritus into a cohesive network. Ford's Sync system has already made that possible on many fronts and GM's OnStar has set a new standard for safety, navigation and communication. Atlanta-based Hughes Telematics is announcing a new system that will fuse both of those systems into a comprehensive whole and selling a subscription service akin to OnStar's arrangement.The Hughes setup will integrate turn-by-turn navigation, voice commands for phones and iPods, plus provide emergency and roadside assistance. Additionally, it will allow users to purchase certain features – from directions to songs from Sirius – on an ala carte basis, neglecting the need to spend extra cash each month for products you rarely use. The system will also integrate with the vehicle's ECU to allow diagnosis and problem solving that could avoid a trip to the dealer.
Hughes will be releasing all the information about the new system, including the details on it partnership with Chrysler (announced earlier this year) and a major luxury brand, later this week.
[Source: Freep]
Get a WordPress.com Blog
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
FThorn 8:45AM (12/03/2007)
FANTASTIC!
I think GM's OnStar is a great feature for their cars. I have been wanting it myself for some time. Now Chrysler will have that type feature. Good.
Reply
osnofla 8:47AM (12/03/2007)
what car is that in the pic?
Reply
LTZ 8:54AM (12/03/2007)
@osnofla
A Renault Scenic
Reply
Frank 10:21AM (12/03/2007)
And they say Chrylser interiors look bad.
Galley 11:16AM (12/03/2007)
Shifter on the dash; wacky!
MemphisNET 9:04AM (12/03/2007)
Good, but they should be spending their money on making their interiors instead of more toys. I like how inovative Chrysler can be, but this seems like something they should worry about later.
Reply
FThorn 9:12AM (12/03/2007)
They said in the meeting last week that interiors is the NUMBER ONE priority over all. IS that good enough for you?
MemphisNET 5:27PM (12/05/2007)
If they come through, and get something that at least MATCHES GM, then yes it will be.
I am a BIG fan of Chrysler Products. I wish them nothing but the best. But Caliber was a real low, especially since that material wise it was worse than a 1st gen Neon.
The big cars (Mag/300/Charger) are nice, but just boring. Materials is OK but not great.
cowboy bob 9:23AM (12/03/2007)
Good thing I'm over 60. I can,(and have) tucked away enough cars to make it the rest of my life without having Big Brother know exactly where I am, how fast I'm going, or if I have any tendency to visit an establishment for a couple of beers some night. This, and being able to listen to any conversation in your car at any time. What great stuff!! No thanks. I made it this far without somebody on my shoulder, and I can go a little farther thank you.
Reply
Jason 9:49AM (12/03/2007)
Tin foil hat much?
Judy Zik 2:06PM (12/03/2007)
By tucked away cars you mean the the two 70's Buicks and the old Ford parked in the front lawn over top of the bomb shelter with the ham radio antenna on top right. :)
Calguy 9:47AM (12/03/2007)
I never wanted OnStar.. it just came with the Saab I bought in 2001. I shrugged when the salesperson talked it up. Now, I wouldn't consider a car without something like it (TeleAid or BMW Assist for instance).
The genius of having a human available to get me someplace fast, with the best directions -or finding a carwash, Target or obscure residence makes my job way easier. I drive a lot, into new places all the time. No navigation system can do what OnStar can.
If Chrysler/Hughes are going to really up the offering, if nothing else, OnStar die-hards will definitely shop the brand with new interest.
Reply
cowboy bob 12:37PM (12/03/2007)
I will not deny that some of the benefits of onboard help when you want it is convienent. There is a price for that in your privacy. If you are willing to give up that privacy, fine. If not, then where is your option to "option delete" this device? Some of us simply don't want it. It's a CHOICE. One we are simply not being allowed to make! I don't want it, I don't want to pay for it, and I don't think I should have to pay to have something I don't want. Period.
Zane 10:34AM (12/03/2007)
I might be wrong, but something about that dash doesn't look right. The gear appears to be in top-view while the steering and centre console are at a 45 deg angle?
Reply
Icon149 10:58AM (12/03/2007)
Welcome to the gear change in a European minivan type vehicle. that is just where they mount the shifter, on the dash rather than on the floor. (no transmission between the seats with front wheel drive cars and transversely mounted engines).
cowboy bob 12:41PM (12/03/2007)
Yea, and don't look up into the satellite face recognition cameras either. There might be a predator missle with your name on it, "God willing".
Reply
Golferal 4:24PM (12/03/2007)
Ironically (or not), GM used to own Hughes.
I have OnStar but don't really need it. It's a bit pricey once that free first year expires...
Reply
Scott Glenn 11:42AM (1/24/2008)
Uhhh - no they didn't. Your facts are wrong.
golferal 2:22PM (1/24/2008)
Sorry buddy, but my dad worked for Hughes Aircraft for 30 years and without a doubt, Hughes Aircraft was owned by GM. They purchased it whole in 1985 for $5.7 billion and subsequently sold off divisions to other Aerospace contractors such as Raytheon and Boeing.
Also, I just purchased my third vehicle under the GM Employee discount program because my father is a Hughes retiree.