Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.













Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
berne1 @ Nov 27th 2007 10:13PM
I have yet to understand the appeal of HD radio. Of course, I've had XM for the past 3-4 years, but still...what's the appeal of HD, I get better quality commericals?
The couple weeks here in Detroit when I was in a rental, I tried commercial radio again. Basically, this: in the morning, you don't get music on any local stations, it's all these "morning shows" (you know, the same show in your city, with different names). Plus, I listened to the popular morning show here and it's basically the same shtick as it was 6 years ago when I moved away. The one morning I timed 13 straight minutes of commercials. Ugh. So that's what made me a satellite radio convert. Definitely worth the $13/mo to me. That and my XM stations play wherever I go, where with HD I still have to find stations when I travel.
Plus I'm reading the rates drop should this merger go through, down to $6.95 for a basic package. I honestly don't know how anybody listens to commercial radio anymore. I don't think HD will do anything to slow the rush to satellite.