Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.













Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadNo, you can't afford it: Rolls-Royce Phantom Tungsten
(Page 1 of 1)
2004m3driver @ Nov 23rd 2007 7:21PM
I am wide awake. This thing isn't too much different than its predecessor. Yes I understand people pay for the tradition, but that is in what they can see like the interior. Everything else should be on the bleeding end of high tech for the price. It better be the safest sturdiest innovate car out there to be asking for a 400K plus price tag. At least they could have made the rest of the cars out of high tech material. I don't care about traditional steel unless its some kinda special light weight alloy that is sturdier then cast aluminum. Wouldn't it be better if their tradition was in making the most luxurious, safest, exotic, prestigious, and high end cars. Instead of gouging people because they made it out of traditional steel in England?
I guess they only way I could really enjoy this car is when I'm old, rich, and have a chaffeur.
O btw, they should impress me just like how a Veyron will impress everyone with all the development put into it. Not that I am saying I don't like the Phantom, I just wish it wasn't just a big, menacingly good looking, fat sedan dressed up with a 400k sticker.