<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/18/dead-again-wsj-says-pt-cruiser-indeed-short-lived/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/18/dead-again-wsj-says-pt-cruiser-indeed-short-lived/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/18/dead-again-wsj-says-pt-cruiser-indeed-short-lived/</guid><description><![CDATA[The PT Cruiser's styling was dated from the first day it rolled off the line.  The mild refreshing it had was simply not enough to sustain it.<br><br>Chrysler shouldn't have strayed so far from the Pronto concept:<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth_Pronto" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth_Pronto</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2007 11:38AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>