Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
New KITT Attack Mode revealed at Comic Con
London 2008: Honda OSM concept roadster says, "Cheerio!"
London 2008: Lotus unveils the Evora
2010 Chevy Camaro - Official Details and Images
2010 Chevy Camaro - LIVE from the reveal
First Drive: Maserati Quattroporte S in Europe
First Drive: 2008 MINI Cooper S JCW
In the Autoblog Garage:2009 Nissan GT-R
North American Exclusive First Drive: Alfa MiTo
First Drive: 2009 Kia Borrego
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadDead Again: WSJ says PT Cruiser indeed short lived
(Page 1 of 1)
whofan @ Nov 18th 2007 8:27AM
Shame this car is getting the ax. I would think theres life left in the cruiser. Its a small effiecent utility vehicle now when fuel prices are going through the roof, the PT Cruiser looks better all the time.
YouFaceTheTick @ Nov 18th 2007 11:14AM
As others have stated, low 20s is common in a PT. That's not efficient. That's not even close to efficient. My Cooper S gets 30 mpg getting run really hard. My wife's A3 nets her 26-27 mpg. WTF are you driving that a PT's 21 mpg seems efficient?
adam @ Nov 18th 2007 11:38AM
The PT Cruiser's styling was dated from the first day it rolled off the line. The mild refreshing it had was simply not enough to sustain it.
Chrysler shouldn't have strayed so far from the Pronto concept:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth_Pronto