<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[All together now:  But it's not a fully boxed frame.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Random Task]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 11:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Right- because the rear frame ends almost have anything to do with a frontal crash, right?<br>Funny, how the one brand new truck that scored **** for both front passengers, ends up on the IIHS top pick. Perhaps the repair costs are lower? Or maybe they included the lower femur loads]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guenther]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 11:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[IIHS does significantly harder front impact test then the NHTSA.  This is because the IIHS do asymmetrical front impact "offset" where 40% of the front are impacted, unlike the flat brick wall style tests the NHTSA does.  This is due to the fact that most people don't get into accidents with completely flat surfaces.<br><br>Also the IIHS conducts the test at 40 mph vs the 35 mph the NHTSA does.<br><br>The fact the Tundra does well on the IIHS test and does 4-stars on the NHTSA test means that the vehicle does better on offset frontal collision.  Which is really better for the real world.<br><br>More here:<br><a href="http://www.informedforlife.org/viewartcl.php?index=10" rel="nofollow">http://www.informedforlife.org/viewartcl.php?index=10</a><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Temple]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[hahaha...Chrysler Crap Boxes cant make the list...<br><br>'None produced by Chrysler Corp. made the list. The company said in a statement, "Chrysler vehicles have performed well on a variety of internal and third party tests \[and\] our vehicles have consistently achieved top ratings in the government's crash test program." '<br><br><a href="http://www.newsday.com/business/ny-bzcars1115,0,6800553.story" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsday.com/business/ny-bzcars1115,0,6800553.story</a><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Menice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 11:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[5 STAR crash rating from NHTSA is good enough for me. <br><br>Also what Chrysler products did they even test? Hell, I want a list of ALL the vehicles they tested. <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 11:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can see all the tested cars on the main IIHS page.  Pick from the dropdown menu.<br><br>And that "5 star" crap means nothing as the NHTSA tests aren't anywhere near as thorough as the IIHS or NCAP tests.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob-omb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 11:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[GM doesn't have any American product on the list either. Ford managed to have 2 vehicles show up as 5 separate models, so cudos, I suppose. I'm a little surprised that the STS and new CTS didn't make the cut.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guenther]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 12:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[How can the Tundra which got a 4star government rating get an IIHS Top Safety Pick?  Aren't the IIHS test tougher?<br><br>Truck should not be on the list even if it passed the IIHS tests with flying colors, the fact it hasn't done well in one of the tests (Gov or IIHS) means some part of it isn't the safest it could be.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Du]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 12:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[IIHS and NHTSA crash tests are good compliments to each other, but they do test different crash aspects:<br><br>The NHTSA tests are, essentially, tests of the passive safety systems as the full-frontal and side-impact crashes distribute forces across the whole structure--something that usually does not happen in real life.  They are good measures of how well airbags and such work.<br><br>The IIHS tests are a better tell as to the structure and the restraint systems--they concentrate force into a smaller area, more closely mimicking a real crash and stressing the structure of the vehicle to a greater degree.  IIHS tests are also slightly more comparable across weight classes, but not very. <br><br>Usually, a vehicle will pass the NHTSA test but do more poorly on the IIHS one (the Chevy Venture and Ford F150 are particularly nasty examples of how badly a vehicle does in IIHS vs NHTSA).  That the Tundra did the opposite is interesting, but not unheard of, and generally it's the IIHS test that matters more.<br><br>Remember: it's the *INSURANCE* Institute of Highway Safety.  They want to keep you safe first and your vehicle safe second because medical payments cost a lot more than vehicle repairs/writeoffs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[psarhjinian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like they included accident avoidance measures as well.  The text states that the Tundra includes stability control as standard, along with side airbags, both of which push it to a top pick rating.  <br><br>Of course, one would assume that the Silverado, which has outperformed the Tundra on other actual crash tests, would fare just as well or better than the Tundra when equipped with the optional stability control and/or side airbags.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Harrity]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 12:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Guenther<br><br>can you read?<br><br>Saturn VUE built after December 2007----although it isn't stellar, Saturn made the list.<br><br>Anywho when you get into a "real world" accident it's always a crapshoot.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 12:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Vue?  It's a rebadged Opel Antara, and it's built in Mexico.  About at un-American as you can get.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[djSyndrome]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I read at at a 7th grade level- I see the saturn now. Nothing wrong with that- just surprising that's the only one, with the slew of new models out right now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guenther]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 12:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[How did they test a car that was built in the future?  It's not December 2007 yet.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 1:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ djSyndrome:<br><br>ok if you are going to split hairs then every Japanese car on that list that is made in America, by your logic is American.<br><br>I was just making a clear observation that a GM branded vehicle, sold in the United States was on the list.  But someone needed to nit-pick, are you having a rough day?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 1:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Erik: I'm having a great day - taking pot shots at ill-informed GM apologists always warms the cockles of my heart :)<br><br>The primary point of my post (that you missed) is that the Vue isn't an American vehicle *at all*.  That has as much to do with the fact that it's a badge-engineered Opel as the fact that it's assembled by folks who can't read the warning labels on the sun visors.  Any credit for its crash performance should be given to the folks in Germany who designed the vehicle and made it conform to the (much tougher) European crash test standards, not to GM of America which is completely incapable of building a safe vehicle.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[djSyndrome]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[2008 Mailbu scores a "Good" rating in IIHS tests but GM can't make a safe vehicle. <br><br>Bulit in Kansas City, Kansas<br><br>I know....I'm ill-informed<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 3:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll make this quick.<br><br>'08 Legacy (ZOMG built in Indiana!) : <a href="http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=203" rel="nofollow">http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=203</a> .  'G' markings across the board.<br><br>'08 Malibu : <a href="http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=885" rel="nofollow">http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=885</a> .  1 'A' rating for leg/foot.<br><br>Good, but why can't a brand-new Malibu best a *four-year-old* Subaru?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[djSyndrome]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 3:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[hey smartass (djsyndrom), the saturn vue is just as much a saturn as it is an opel. that's right, it was designed and engineered by neither company. it's a daewoo winstrom.<br><br>taking pot shots at domestic haters warms the cockles of my heart :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 8:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IIHS awards 34 models its Top Safety Pick Award for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/15/iihs-awards-34-models-its-top-safety-pick-award-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice that the Saab 9-3 has been on there since 2003.  It'd be nice if GM could've implemented the lessons it learned in the 9-3 to the other, newer Epsilons (Aura, G6)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[psarhjinian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 12:37PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>