<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/14/la-2007-2009-chevy-silverado-hybrid/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/14/la-2007-2009-chevy-silverado-hybrid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/14/la-2007-2009-chevy-silverado-hybrid/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why is it so hard to believe GM was first with this? Because engineering life in Warren and Pontiac looks like an episode of Hee-haw???   /sarcasm/<br>I still think the small diesel option will make more sense to commercial truck owners. One segment that could well benefit from the technologies on these vehicles is the livery business. If you can cut down idle times, especially in horrid NY traffic, you'll save a lot of fuel. A Town-boat gets about 10mpg in city driving. <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guenther]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 11:02AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>