Yes, we know it looks like the Esprit. Please don't bombard us with comments about how it looks like the old Esprit. It really is the new GT from Lotus, known for now as the Eagle. It's wearing Esprit body panels, so yes, we know it looks like the old Esprit. Based on a heavily revised Elise structure and powered by a Toyota V6 plunked down in the middle of the chassis and kicking out 300 hp, the coupe will cost about $100,000 (£48,000). Even though Lotus isn't fond of them, the transmission will be a paddle-shift automated manual. Lotus cites market desires for the about-face on the transmission. The Eagle will spawn several different models, including a convertible and a replacement for the reviled Europa. When they're done, the Eagle won't look like the Esprit. Instead, the bodywork will more closely follow the M250. Cramming four seats into a mid-engined chassis takes some cleverness, and who's more clever than Lotus?[Source: Autocar]
GM shrinks Volt's gas tank, range drops from 600 to 360 miles
MINI dealers to sell Alfa Romeos in the U.S.
Honda to reveal OSM open-top concept in London
With crisis looming, GM may unveil Volt for 100th anniversary
Next BMW M5 will nix V10 in favor of twin-turbo V8
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Lincoln MKS
Track Test: 2008 Roush 427R Trak Pak Mustang
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Porsche Cayman S
First Drive: 2009 Chevrolet Traverse
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata Retractable Hard Top
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
rndmnme @ Nov 9th 2007 1:06PM
It looks like the old Esprit.
k.w.a @ Nov 9th 2007 1:30PM
hahaha
...hey, you know what? this looks a lot like the old Espirit
acidic @ Nov 9th 2007 1:08PM
Who is more clever than Lotus? Hrrmmm...that's too easy.
Granted, Lotus makes some nice hardware, but I would hate to see what the legroom is going to be like in a 2+2.
Kowell @ Nov 9th 2007 2:22PM
I'm getting flashbacks from 1990....
Aaron B Brown @ Nov 9th 2007 2:46PM
What's with the flip up headlights, what is this the 80s. Most car manufacturers got the message in the 90s, that performance car buyers are not really interested in having to deployer air brakes that significantly screw up your aerodynamic profile whenever the sun goes down.
And when the drive motors go bad, and you try to turn on your lights, the only thing that gets illuminated is the inside of your bumper. Lotus must be playing in on the cheap with this model.
Dan Roth @ Nov 9th 2007 3:04PM
And there we have it, folks. An Autoblog reader who's here for the pictures.
broosewee @ Nov 9th 2007 3:40PM
Haha, "Autoblog reader"...
Mike @ Nov 9th 2007 3:41PM
Step 1: Look at the photo
Step 2: Ignore the text
Step 3: Comment
Mark @ Nov 9th 2007 3:59PM
reading > Aaron B Brown
A. Brown Wannabe @ Nov 9th 2007 6:23PM
WTF!?!?! Good job on going retro, Lotus. There is only one true Esprit...
SherbornSean @ Nov 10th 2007 7:23AM
Speaking of not reading, Dan, you may have noticed that the article (the one you summarized rather than do your own primary research) mentioned the Eagle would compete in price with the Cayman S. That's not $100K.
Dan Roth @ Nov 10th 2007 8:32AM
We're a blog, part of what we do is aggregate the news from a variety of sources.
The article was from a UK pub, and the price range they cited for the Cayman S was 48,000 pounds. Please find the current pound-to-dollar exchange rate and do the math. 48,000 pounds equals roughly 100,000 dollars. While the Cayman S doesn't sell for that much *here*, the US isn't the market the Autocar post was written for. Context, man, context.
Mike @ Nov 13th 2007 7:19PM
@ Dan Roth
Ha - I'm British, and when I read you got the article from a 'UK pub' my first thought was you'd got it from a drunk in a bar. Pub =Publisher - now I get it.
Richard @ Nov 10th 2007 9:24AM
"the transmission will be a paddle-shift automated manual" is not accurate. Autocar said "available."
Lotus has too much pride to mandate a sissy gearbox for everyone. Let's just call it what it is, an AUTOMATIC that people can pretend is "F1 inspired" with 40ms gearchanges that nobody uses 'cause automatic mode is always engaged.
It's the same as the limited slip diff in the Elise. Lotus offered it, but told every magazine it could that the option was worthless. (It's useful for autox only)