<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/30/sema-2007-chrysler-barracuda-concept/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/30/sema-2007-chrysler-barracuda-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/30/sema-2007-chrysler-barracuda-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think no, Challenger is quit 300C-ized, like the current Charger, too sharp.<br><br>This Barracuda has a design more smooth, harmonic. Maybe this is a sighn that new Chrysler have got the right hand in your own retro style!<br>Put it on production right now!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LGM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 31st 2007 6:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/30/sema-2007-chrysler-barracuda-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/30/sema-2007-chrysler-barracuda-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[The sad thing is, people are reporting that the Challenger is going to clock in at close to 4k lbs. Pretty chunky if you ask me. Chrysler have better thought of a way to slim it down.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Person]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 31st 2007 4:02PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>