<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Audi and Mazda are the two car makers who have clear understanding of a cohesive design language! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aetius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2007 8:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree, all Audi models have a very recognizable (and attractive) style.  You know an Audi when you see one.  <br><br>But I would warn Audi of becoming too much like BMW, which I think has taken a serious downturn in recent years as far as design goes.  This new A4 looks a lot like the new 3-series, especially from the back and side profiles.  <br><br>-Greg]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2007 8:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Definitely, I went to a ride and drive today at a local Audi store.  It was a fantastic day as I got to drive the S8, S6, and the RS4.  The S8 is pure luxury, the RS4 is pure sports sedan, and the S6 splits the difference.  I can't wait to try the S5, and the new A4/S4.  They also had an R8 on hand for sitting in, but no drives.    <br><br>BTW - The RS4 is the best car I have ever driven.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[J.Crew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2007 10:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah,<br><br>But the problem - IMHO - with Audi is that, until this emerging generation, all the sedans looked the same.  You couldn't tell an A4 from an A6 in profile.<br><br>The emergent generation is much better in that regard...but they are all "be-Bangled," though Audi have hit all their exteriors more uniformly with that ugly stick!<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2007 5:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think it is time for my boring Lexus IS 250AWD to go when this hit the streets. I will take mine 3.2 With S-Tronic  and s-line please ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John hender]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2007 8:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[seems like you chose the 250AWD out of being scared.<br><br>why not opt for the 3.5L, which I'm betting yoyu right now, it'll still be faster than the S4.<br><br>maybe you're still waiting for the ADW, in which case you'd have a hard time not opting for the G35x or CTS AWD both of which will be fasrted and more fun that this FWD Front heavy A4, <br><br>maybe you are only looking at a confy ride adn just enough sport to think you're an enthusiast<br><br>good luck with the $40+k 3.2L A4 AWD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ligor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2007 8:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Should get one before Xmas, those fairy lights would look good out the front...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2007 8:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[The car looks awesome, but the front headlights (while cool) kind of make it look like the car is balling its eyes out to me. Just my .02 :P.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maestro1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2007 9:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[It could still use less overhang (and better weight distribution, and bigger cylinder bore spacing)<br><a href="http://gallery.audiworld.com/gallery/album372/A4070051_medium" rel="nofollow">http://gallery.audiworld.com/gallery/album372/A4070051_medium</a><br>Move the axle under the engine (just barely) change the shape of the oil sump, and move the rack to the front of the engine (in the new space created)<br><a href="http://gallery.audiworld.com/gallery/album372/A4070031_medium" rel="nofollow">http://gallery.audiworld.com/gallery/album372/A4070031_medium</a><br>The Audi V6 effectively splits the difference between Toyota's 2.5 & 3.5 V6, and BMW's 328/335<br><a href="http://gallery.audiworld.com/gallery/album372/A4070141_medium" rel="nofollow">http://gallery.audiworld.com/gallery/album372/A4070141_medium</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MikeW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2007 9:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's boring here is reading the MikeW Audi comments on Autoblog which incidentally, is the same damn point over and over again for as long as I've been reading this blog. OK WE GET IT - you believe that Audi engineers are so stupid that they keep making the same "mistake" over and over again by not creating cars with perfect 50/50 weight distribution.  WHO CARES.  They are probably pretty smart engineers (NOT as smart as you of coarse) who are kind of known for engineering detail and design.  Maybe your time would be better spend e-mailing Audi engineers to let them know the correct way to design thier oil sumps and racks and cylinder bore spacing - I mean, maybe they just don't know any better?  Please, do this so we can get this resolved so I can read an Audi write up and check out some pictures and read some interesting comments without reading your nonsense.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DearToolbox,]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2007 10:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love VW & Audi design style. <br>But I have to say that I was a bit dissapointed when I saw A4 after seeing A5. It just looks too much like stretched A5. I thought they could have added or changed to make it look more like a sedan. I dunno.. just my 2C.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[VdubRider]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2007 9:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks haawt! But why does the back end remind me o much of the new 3 series coupe? hmmm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[klitorisaurus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2007 9:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[because BMW copyed the rear from the old S4 RS4 to their E92 Coupe ..the new A4 rear looks exactly like a slightly updated B7 S4/RS4 rear.. <br><br>new A4 rear<br><a href="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/au002939_l.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/au002939_l.jpg</a><br><br>looks like the old A4/S4/RS4 rear with A5 rear lights added<br><a href="http://files.conceptcarz.com/img/Audi/audi_RS4_manu-07_a-013-1024.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://files.conceptcarz.com/img/Audi/audi_RS4_manu-07_a-013-1024.jpg</a><br><br>nothing copyed from BMW...<br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nagmashot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2007 9:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks sharp overall, but the line of LED's in the headlights are just cheap bling to me.  That belongs on a Cobalt, not a car that I associate with understated class.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pinepig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2007 10:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[that led carbage underneath the lamps is fn nasty!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vkchu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2007 10:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree.  Couldn't they have incorporated them in an unobtrusive way that doesn't look like a cheap whore's false eyelashes?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Owain Ozymandias Buck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2007 8:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think this is the most gutless redesign in aeons. I like that Audi doesn't dabble in cheesy swoosh lines like that which is on every MB right now, but this is SO conservative and safe. The interior looks like EVERY other AUDI and it really moves the game on very little. No errors.. just no passion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Calguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2007 10:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree completely.  The A4 is a pleasant car but offers no excitement to me.  There isn't a defining characteristic about it and it looks too similar to the previous A4.  With all of the exciting cars in this class I think Audi needs to do better.  The next TL should kill this car.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2007 10:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA["The next TL should kill this car."<br><br>LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.<br><br>hahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahah. ooh boy. phew. no no, wait - hahahahhahahahahhahahahaahahhaha. man that was funny]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[testa di cazzo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2007 12:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/17/pics-aplenty-the-new-audi-a4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice.  You must be blind as a bat.  The next TL will have over 300 hp, advanced AWD, better styling than the A4, cost less money, better reliability, better technology, and stronger resale value...how can the A4 hang with that?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2007 12:25AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>