First drive: 2008 Nissan Rogue S

click above image to view high-res gallery of the 2008 Nissan Rogue S
Crossovers. Every automaker either has one or has one in the works. Nissan has perhaps the first CUV in the Murano, and now it's joined by the Sentra-based Rogue. Let's start with that name. We're pretty sure Nissan intended to invoke thoughts of rebelliousness and individuality. But the word can also be used to indicate someone who is a cheat, a swindler, disobedient and savage. Nissan's Rogue is none of these, which is neither bad nor good. The Rogue is pretty much a tall Sentra wagon, and we think perhaps Sentra Wagon might have been a much more honest name.
On the outside, there's little to get excited about. Our base model Rogue's monochrome exterior could have benefited greatly from some chrome door guards, handles or mirrors – just something shiny to break up that expanse of Venom Red. The Rogue's face gets a little shiny nose sandwiched between two egg-crate Venom-red nostrils that lead down to, again, a Venom Red air dam. Those two creases seem lost in the hood, and do little to give the car any visual excitement. Out back Nissan continued the monochrome theme and we're surprised they didn't find a way to fit a body-color exhaust tip. We've seen photos of a chrome roof-rack equipped Rogue that proves brightwork can be a good thing. Nissan, meet chrome. It can be your friend.Continue reading about our first encounter with Nissan's new Rogue after the jump.
Gallery: First Drive: 2008 Nissan Rogue S
Live Photos Copyright ©2007 Chris Tutor / Weblogs, Inc.
Inside, the Rogue's interior isn't bad, actually. Fit, finish and quality aren't bad for the price point and will win over some low-end CUV shoppers. Cup holders and storage bins are lined with removable rubber, the seat fabric is nice to the touch and the seats themselves are comfortable for the 30 minutes we drove it. A generously-sized glove box opens wide enough to hold even a medium-sized purse, but unfortunately doesn't lock. Valuables can also be hidden behind the car's rear seats beneath the carpeted cargo mat. Still no lock, but a bit less obvious.


Brushed-metal-look accents make the otherwise all-black interior less dreary and feel more upscale. Behind the front passenger seat is a pocket for maps and papers, as well as a useful bag hook. It's not so useful, though, with someone in the back right seat. With the front seats comfortably adjusted, rear legroom is good, with an inch or so to spare between knees and seats and space below for feet to slide.

The Rogue's rear seats fold flat as you would expect, opening up lots of cargo-carrying possibilities. The back wheel wells don't intrude nearly as much as some crossovers we've seen, which makes for very usable space.
If the 16-inch steel wheels with plastic covers don't tip you off to the Rogue's econo-car roots, the performance will. Mating a 2.5-liter, 170-HP four-cylinder to a CVT does nothing to make the Rogue more likable. Acceleration is gradual, and while some probably like how a CVT eliminates gear changes, we're pretty sure most Autobloggers prefer the feel of first to second to third. As a reward for putting up with a CVT, drivers should see greatly improved fuel economy. But we wouldn't call the Rogue's 22 city, 27 highway greatly improved. It's good, sure, but the Sentra with the same engine and transmission gets 24/30. We chalked up the difference to weight, but comparing the 2.5-liter Rogue to the 2.5-liter Sentra SE-R comes up with the Rogue weighing only 195 lbs. more.
On the road the CUV isn't sporty at all, with a soft ride contributing to a bit of lean in the turns and understeer if pushed harder. Sure, it's a crossover and not a sportscar, but we still expect better handling in our cars. On the plus side, wind and road noise are controlled rather well.
At just over $20,000, our base model Rogue S had air conditioning, power windows and doors, cruise control with steering wheel controls, keyless entry and a CD player. The only options were splash guards and floor mats.
With some exterior sprucing up, a tighter suspension and either a real transmission or real improvement in fuel economy, the Rogue will be a contender, but will still find it hard living up to such a provocative name.
Nissan provided the vehicle and SEAMO the location for testing. Autoblog does not accept travel or lodging from automakers when attending media events.
Live Photos Copyright ©2007 Chris Tutor / Weblogs, Inc.








Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
YouFaceTheTick 12:07PM (10/16/2007)
Chrome is never a good thing. It looks trashy. It was one more thing I despised about my 2006 330i...too damn much pimp-mobile chrome.
Reply
Fever 12:19PM (4/29/2008)
I agree, chrome is for pimps in 88 cadillac's. I bought one of the first 1000 made, and my review is about the opposite of Autoblog. The steering is very responsive, CVT pulls hard under acceleration. I don't care if it shifts or not, as long as I get in front of whatever I am trying to get in front of. Autoblog should objectively rate the car instead of telling people what they want. If you read their review, that is what they talk about the most; what they think people want. All you have to do is test drive it. If you don't like it, don't buy it. But don't tell me what I want. Only I know that.
paul34 12:09PM (10/16/2007)
Ehh. I don't know. Not only am I sick of the Rogue commercials, which seem nearly impossible to get away from, but this design makes me very uncomfortable.
Almost like a newer Sentra on stilts.
>> Nissan, meet chrome. It can be your friend.
NO! Come now Autoblog, I surely hope that was a joke!
Reply
CW 12:26PM (10/16/2007)
The Rgoue you tested was an S model. There in lies many problems. For about $5,000 more you can get a almost loaded SL AWD. For cost-minded buyers, disregard this. That 5 grand gets you Xenon lights, intelligent key, sunroof, alloy wheels, Bose sound system, etc. Pretty much everything but leather, which costs $1800 more. You don't get chrome, nor do you need it. What you get for the money really counts here. A comparable CR-V or RAV4 would easily set you back more, and even then some options on the Rogue aren't available on those.
That said, the Rogue would be alot better with a little rhinoplasty. Someone get Dr. Troy and McNamara on the phone
rv 12:15PM (10/16/2007)
Nissan makes some cheap looking cars. Man! What decade is it again???
Reply
Greek Boy 12:15PM (10/16/2007)
How dull.
Add something to that front end. Even chrome would look far nicer than that thing.
This thing is destined to be an also-ran.
Even the tired old Escape looks far better than that thing.
Reply
Nick 12:15PM (10/16/2007)
The Murano is the first CUV? Really? If you define a CUV as a car based truck with a transverse front engine, unibody construction, and standard fwd, then the Lexus RX300 must certainly be the first one, released as a 1999 model.
Reply
SherbornSean 12:32PM (10/16/2007)
Quite true!
DJ 12:48PM (10/16/2007)
Perhaps we need to look back at when the term 'CUV' was first applied and when the 'C' changed from referring to these as 'Cute-Ute' as it was first applied to the CR-V/RAV4/Sidekick to the more fashionable 'Crossover'.
It's arguable that car-based utility vehicles have been around for a very long time -- going backwards examples include the Subaru Outback (1995), the Suzuki Samurai, 1984 Chysler Minivans, AMC Eagle, VW Microbus ... 1930's Suburban.
That One Person 5:29PM (10/16/2007)
Wrong. The CR-V came out in 1996 as a 97. Same with the Rav4 (technically it came out in 94 in Japan and Europe).
Nick 5:30PM (10/16/2007)
Right, right, totally forgot about those.
FThorn 12:23PM (10/16/2007)
I find it hilarious to suggest adding chrome; when it used be the foreign car lovers BASHED chrome this and that - especially wheels. Funny how times change. Now they like big cars and wagons, too. But claim these categories for themselves?
Reply
Ted Kennedy Is My Chauffer 12:26PM (10/16/2007)
I thought the first uni-body, car platform based 4WD CUV was the 1980 AMC Eagle.
Speaking of AMC, a '65 Rambler Rogue with the Typhoon 290 seems like a lot more fun than this thing. At least the Rambler had more concealed cargo area and got about the same hwy mileage.
Reply
SherbornSean 12:34PM (10/16/2007)
You may be right, but the Eagle didn't start a trend the way the RX did.
terraFocus 12:43PM (10/16/2007)
1975 Subaru 4WD Wagon?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:1975_Subaru_DL.jpg
Aetius 12:34PM (10/16/2007)
Nissan's large vehicles -
Titan
Pathfinder
X-Trail
X-Terra
Quest
Rogue
Murano
Armada
Frontier
Is Nissan going the way of Chrysler? Too many products!
Reply
ebm14 8:08PM (10/16/2007)
They should kill off the Xterra, Maxima and Pathfinder
and add the X-trail to the line up. The Cube will come here and a larger nicer sedan.
J.Crew 11:16PM (10/16/2007)
The Rogue is small. It is built off the Sentra.
Richard Martin 12:36PM (10/16/2007)
The Toyota RAV 4 probably started this segment. It came to the US in 1996.
Reply
JUSBEEZ 12:37PM (10/16/2007)
So ugly
Reply