<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[A wagon would be pretty cool but an off-roader?<br>I think not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SPG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 6:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is a beautiful looking Hyundai. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Preston M]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 6:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nail on the head !]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dreizehnernuss]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 7:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, that convertible rendering really highlights how painfully awkward the front end is on the new XF.  Hopefully they'll rush an emergency refresh into production within a year or two.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[500]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 9:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh and by the way, the 2000 Monte Carlo called.  It wants its headlights back:<br><br><a href="http://gm.wieck.com/forms/gm/previewpage?003157" rel="nofollow">http://gm.wieck.com/forms/gm/previewpage?003157</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[500]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 13th 2007 12:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[There will be no SUVish Jaguar and I think the X-Type wagon shows how bad an idea a Jag wagon is.<br><br>I want Jag to make a smallish coupe/convertible/roadster using the Inline six engine that was developed for Land Rover/Volvo. It was designed with FF, AWD and FR drive line lay outs in mind and I think it would be great to go back to Jags inline six heritage. The current NA 3.2 liter makes 235 hp and I am sure you could tweak that to 260 or so without sacrificing reliability. The T6 version makes 281 hp which could probably be tweaked up above 300 hp for a R version. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[British_Rover]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[Boy, that is not a pretty car at all.  Jaguar better hope it works out ok, or it's curtains for them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 7:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[a drophead and a coupe are great ideas... not so much the estate, definitely not an off-roader. <br><br>i'd rather see Jag produce a sports car like the prototype F-Type. Compete with the likes of the z4 and boxster/cayman. But that's just me...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 7:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[Amen on the F-type.<br><br>They don't need an expensive version of the sebring convertible, which is what the photochop looks like. <br><br>They need an honest-to-goodness mid-priced jaguar SPORTS CAR, exactly right to go after the Z4/Boxter. Smaller, lighter, faster, less expensive and luxurious than the XK, and english-styled. If they still use Ford sourced engines (since ford won't be liquidating ALL of their shares in Jag, just the majority) They could use the 3.5, TwinForce, or the AJ-V8, or even the supercharged version of the AJ-V8, in the premium /R model. In a 3000lb coupe or convertible. Sounds great, and if styled correctly, a winner.<br><br>BTW, for all the folks who would cry about undercutting the XK, The XK is a premium luxury grand tourer, not a 2-seat real sports car. It is hard/impossible to get one with a manual transmission, it is big, heavy, and has 4 seats. It is a nice car, but it is a grand tourer.<br><br>The production XF is only really dissappointing in the fact that it went vanilla on the front end. Keeping the angry-squint black eyes of the concept headlights would have fixed almost all of it. And it is completely possible. <br><br>The production XF headlights are low-beam projectors, and have a lot of spare plastic around them that could have been designed out to fade that hard upper scallop into the hood, and simply keeping the turned-down corners and slightly up-canted flat lower line, rather than turning *up* the corners... and it would have been fine. It would seem hardly a problem to tool for, and really has no bearing on the legality of the lights and reflectors.<br><br>The XF is vanilla compared to the concept, and the convertible chop is another "cruiser" concept, and hardly something that people would drool over, on their way to a Jaguar dealership. <br><br>Long live the XK-SS, C, D, and E types, as they have yet to be succeeded by a current production mass-market Jaguar. They should have built the XK180 concept car, as well. Even the XJR-15, and the XJ-220 were barely more than a few prototypes up for sale.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 7:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes exactly a smaller, lighter and all aluminum roadster and coupe would be great. They don't even need to use a V8 as the Land Rover/Volvo Inline six would be a great engine for a sub 3,000 lbs car.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[British_Rover]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[You could slap a subaru outback convertible sticker on that thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kumar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[they need something like the BMW X6... build with help from Landrover.... <br><br>and also a small miata sized roadster... and an entry level car that used the c-xf front end for real....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[retsel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 8:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[well not bad. The front end needs to be lowered <br>,the grille needs to be in deeper ,and the rear needs to be longer. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[94 taurus owner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 8:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's a really fancy Eos.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristovar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 9:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, what a plain looking car.  Really disappointing.  Jaguars used to be stylish.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 9:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jaguar is sad. They need to just flip through their back catalog of 50's and 60's cars... Just throw a dart and build one of those instead.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Eaton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 12th 2007 10:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok must be blind day or something. This car looks great! Much better than the S-type. Looks like a Hyundai? Hyundai wishes they had a car that looked this good! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 13th 2007 12:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, Kristovar, yes!  It's a bloated Eos (from that angle).  <br><br>Yep, this car could be the death of Jag as we know it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Freddy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 13th 2007 1:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[its sad how the Ford Mondeo wich were this Monstrousity got its roots from actually looks better like freddy said this car could be the end jag]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 13th 2007 2:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rendered speculation: Jaguar XF convertible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good Photoshop, but that's all it is.  CWW is talented guy who has a website full of his work, none of it officially sanctioned by any manufacturer. <br><br><a href="http://www.cwwcardesign.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cwwcardesign.com/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[P-B]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 13th 2007 6:44AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>