7_frank_jaguarxf-7_opt.jpg)
click above image for more live, high-res shots of the Jaguar XF
Immediately after images of the Jaguar XF appeared on the web a few weeks ago, debate began over whether this new sedan will save or sink Ford's feline brand. We've now seen the car in person at the 2007 Frankfurt Motor Show, and we can at least say it earns this year's honor of being the most difficult car to shoot with a camera. We did our best though, despite Jaguar's horrendous lighting. First of all, the surfacing of the Jaguar is very complex, switching between concave and convex frequently, especially up front. The poor lighting did show that the XF loves to play with light, so now we're even more interested in seeing one out in the sun. The rear is still derivative of an Aston Martin, but at least there's good trunk space back there. We sat in the back seat to take pics of the dash, and found leg room to be adequate while the seats were comfy. The dash itself, however, is still one of the best features of the XF, with design purportedly influenced by Apple hardware. It's simple, the buttons are extremely logical and the materials are at least as good as in the more expensive XK. Power for the XF comes from Jaguar's line of 4.2L V8 engines, one naturally aspirated at 300 HP and the other supercharged for 420 HP. No weak V6s here.
Check out our live shots of the Jaguar XF in the gallery below, and take in the official press release from Jaguar after the jump.
7_frank_jaguarxf-2_thumbnail.jpg)
7_frank_jaguarxf-6_thumbnail.jpg)
7_frank_jaguarxf-15_thumbnail.jpg)
7_frank_jaguarxf-10_thumbnail.jpg)
7_frank_jaguarxf-13_thumbnail.jpg)
Early Look: £1million Aston Martin One-77
Andrea Pininfarina killed in motorcycle accident
BMW owner tapes black car to white
Nissan confirms G37 Sedan, G37 Convertible and G37x Coupe
2009 Honda Ridgeline introduced early to internet
First Drive: HUMMER H3T
Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy![In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Mercedes-Benz S63 AMG [w/VIDEO]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/amg-s63-1280-11_opt_thumbnail.jpg)
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Mercedes-Benz S63 AMG [w/VIDEO]
Project Track Slut Update: Prepping for the big 
Second Drive: Porsche Boxster RS60 Spyder
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Viv @ Sep 11th 2007 8:54AM
It still doesn't make up for the ugly looking front end. Jaguar ruined a surefire homerun.
Frank the Tank @ Sep 11th 2007 8:56AM
The gear selector is cool, other then that Jaguar sh!t the bed.
stan @ Sep 11th 2007 8:58AM
I really love this car and believe it will be what saves Jag. I found those under seat storage bins to be tacky and very unbefitting a car of this caliber, then i scrolled down and saw they actually were from the new dodge cuv. That made for sense.
Devin @ Sep 11th 2007 9:00AM
Those wheels are horrendous.
acidic @ Sep 11th 2007 12:18PM
Right from a Holden Commodore, I think.
Ols @ Sep 11th 2007 9:17AM
I really want this car to do well and I love 85% of it. Sleek, sporty and classy.... up until the front-end where it just looks ungainly. The grille is fine, but it's the lights that bother me. Too upright and ruined by the bright orange indicators - could they not have been smoked?? Jaguar are so close to reviving their fortunes with this car - I just hope that minor error won't ruin it.
Tim @ Sep 11th 2007 9:23AM
"The dash itself, however, is still one of the best features of the XF, with design purportedly influenced by Apple hardware."
I haven't seen any Apple products covered with an acre of burled walnut and cheesy chrome-framed buttons. Sorry, maybe it looks better in person, but every picture I've seen screams '86 Buick Park Avenue to me.
I certainly want the car to succeed, and maybe that interior will appeal to their target demo, but it mystifies me why you guys are so enthralled it.
Shawn @ Sep 11th 2007 9:28AM
Well, ugly designs work well for MB & BMW...so maybe it'll work for Jag as well. However, I do think this is sort of a car that you have to see in 3d.
Big 2.5 @ Sep 11th 2007 9:39AM
While I may agree that not all BMW designs are superb, I would strongly disagree about MB. In their history I do not remember a single car that would have even so-so design. At its worst, MB does "good, but not the best", and in most cases it is "the best design ever". That is unlike Lexus, for instance, that either creates ugly monsters or copies MB and BMW. Nonetheless, Lexus thriving nowadays, not because of design, but due to other factors. Something that Jag cannot count on.
Big 2.5 @ Sep 11th 2007 9:32AM
Too bad Jag designers had to ruin the front end. The concept was nice, from every angle. Probably scared by the thought that people might actually like it, XF was redesigned in a hurry to look like previous generation Hyundai.
Colin Smith @ Sep 11th 2007 10:32AM
Too many cliches.
The lights, the side vents, the shallow glasshouse. Nothing original. Not a stunner I think.
There will be a new big Alfa one of these days....
tony2x @ Sep 11th 2007 10:40AM
I saw the XF in the metal and agree with Autoblog, the photos do not do it justice. This car is beautiful, the only detailing I don't like is the slightly fussy rear end. I will certainly be checking one out in the showrooms when I change my car next year.
pedro @ Sep 11th 2007 10:42AM
Woops, you guys have some Dodge Journey pictures mixed up with the jaguar. I was wondering why the XF had fold down seats...
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-jaguar-xf-1/392172/
akatsuki @ Sep 11th 2007 10:46AM
This is not even close to a bet-the-company car. It would be too much to hope that the person responsible for ripping off of a Buick Lucerne and Subaru Legacy would be sacked, but they deserve it. I always had a fondness for Jags, I always loves the old XJS coupe, but this thing is a travesty, bring back the concept before it is too late!
Gregg @ Sep 11th 2007 11:03AM
This is great that the design is so polarizing! Bodes well for Jaguar. I think it is a stunner, and I bet those of you who see a Subaru or Buick next to this Jag will see that the "similarities" in designs disappear. I want one, but likely won't be able to afford one until some come off lease.
Tsunami Racer @ Sep 11th 2007 11:38AM
am i the only one who sees 1996 lincoln town car in that dash? that flat panel with the HVAC vents bookending the center audio. that thin sliver of wood that runs along the bottom. replace that sat nav with a 2 din ford radio and voila! it's like you're going to the airport!
Lawrence Phoenix @ Sep 11th 2007 12:01PM
As the new Kia it'd bring down the house..as a Jaguar, Ford's asking price just dipped several million..
Aki @ Sep 11th 2007 12:44PM
Er, people who think it's "polarizing" are thinking too highly of this car. People who dislike it think it's boring. And it is--that front end is "okay"... but when contrasted to how nice the concept was, the change is ridiculous. Orange turn signal, giant oval jutting out, smaller grill, larger headlights... everything they did to it destroyed the sportiness that the concept has.
In person I'm sure it's decent... but decent is not going to save the company, esp when going against the likes of BMW.
Daniel @ Sep 11th 2007 12:45PM
Horrible for Jaguar. This car will be a big flop in Europe. But good for the U.S. where people like Lexus, Accura and other bland designs.
KC @ Sep 11th 2007 1:34PM
Whoever thought that resurrecting the headlights from the final incarnation of the Ford Escort to put onto a brand new Jag should definitely be terminated immediately