
click image above for high-res gallery
Put a gun to my head, hand over a winning lottery ticket and tell me to go out and bring back the best grand touring sports car money can buy, and I may just return with a Jaguar XK. Ask for the best large or midsize luxury saloon, however, and you will not get a car crowned by a leaping jungle cat. Read Dan Roth's review of the 2007 Jaguar XK Convertible, and you'll wonder just how the current XJ, S-Type and X-Type can be sold under the same brand as the XK Coupe and Convertible.
So what happens when you add an "R" to the XK? For one, the price jumps by $11,000 to $92,500. Aside from that, the high-performance version of Jaguar's sexy drop top kicks things up a notch from mild to medium strength. As good as the XK is, does the additional consonant make that big of a difference?
click any image to enlarge

Much of your extra $11,000 is spent under the hood of the XKR, but we'll get to that in a minute. Considering that the standard XK coupe and convertible are regarded as objects of automotive sex, we're curious as to why Jaguar felt it necessary to accessorize their highly regarded design with go-fast trinkets. The XKR gets a new front bumper and mesh grille design that, frankly, doesn't improve the standard car's gentle lines. Add to that a pair of aluminum hood vents emblazoned with the word "SUPERCHARGED" that spoils the surprise below. The most telling sign you've got an XKR on your hands is the air extractor vents behind the front wheels, which here are blinged a bit instead of body colored like on the standard cars. Of course, XKRs also wear new wheels, in our case a set of 19-inchers with five split-spokes per. Finally, all XKR models sport a pair of dual exhausts out back, another indicator your XK is into heavy breathing. 

We're such fans of the standard XK's design that ordering up an XKR without the new front end would be a preferable option. We'd keep the new wheels, chromed side vents and extra set of exhaust tips, as we do believe in differentiating your power player from the rest of the lineup. That said, we could deliver countless bystanders and passerbys who disagree with us. You may remember that the XKR Convertible was with us at the 2007 Woodward Dream Cruise, and surprisingly (at least to us) the convertible from Coventry drew in more than its fair share of gawkers while parked on Motor City's most famous avenue. Despite our reservations, Jaguar must have done something right with striking a balance in the XKR's design of elegant grace and aggressive tendencies.

The interior of the XKR, meanwhile, has been tampered with little by Jaguar. Added are only aluminum "weave" inserts, which our tester didn't even have in favor of burled walnut inserts (a no-cost option), and sport seats with an incredible 16 ways of adjustment that are controlled by a gaudy panel near the door handle. As such, the XKR's chairs were extremely comfortable, and made our 3-hour jaunts between Cleveland and Detroit for the Dream Cruise a pleasure to endure. While the interior itself is identical to the domicile of a standard XK, that's fine as this represents the best instrument panel ever installed in a Jaguar. It earns high marks for the use of expensive materials that feel rich to the touch, as well as the ergonomic elegance of its center console. Front and center is a large 7-inch touchscreen that, aside from being above average in its ease of use, employs one of the prettiest graphical user interfaces (GUI) of any nav system on the market. Unlike many vehicles that offer a built-in touchscreen to control the nav system, audio and HVAC controls, Jag chose to keep redundancy to a minimum and not repeat every command with a button, knob and dial on the dash. It's risky to channel all of the driver's inputs through a single touchscreen, but Jag's GUI is straightforward enough so that your fingers won't be tripping over themselves trying to change stations or input a destination.
Being that the Jaguar XKR Convertible costs nearly $100,000, we appreciated not having to insert a key and twist to get it started. Keyless entry and start are standard in the XKR, so one needs only to approach the vehicle with the key fob on his person, get in and press the start button to hear the roarty engine come to life. Jaguar seemed content not to plunge a syringe full of steroids into the car's 4.2L AJ V8, instead adding a supercharger and raising horsepower by 120 to a more respectable 420. Being that the recently unveiled 2009 Jaguar XF sedan will use the same naturally aspirated and supercharged versions of Jaguar's 4.2L AJ V8, we think it's time this crowning convertible got some more oomph. It's not that the XKR Convertible's 420 horsepower left us wanting, it's just that on paper this engine doesn't stack up well against its German competition, particularly the BMW M6 Convertible that, while costing around $10,000 more, comes with a superlative 500-hp 5.0L V10. Despite the discrepancy in power, we'd still rather be seen sitting in the Jag, which is like a supermodel compared to the BMW's linebacker looks. 





The Jaguar XKR Convertible's folding cloth top hardly spoils the car's profile. It does, however, gobble a good amount of trunk space whether up or down. There's still enough room back there for a couple of soft bags, and we found the trade off more than worthwhile on sunny days when we dropped the top and basked in the aural delight of the cat's subdued purr. While there are technically a pair of chairs behind the driver and front passenger, we never managed to bring a full four along for the ride. The rear seats have literally no leg room, so consider them an adjunct to the trunk.
We spent many miles on the highway with our XKR Convertible, which we thought would be uncomfortable because of the 'R' at the end of its name. Normally the "sporty" version of a model gets that name by firming up the ride, which may improve handling but almost always at the expense of a smooth ride. Despite its 19-inch wheels wearing low profile rubber, the XKR 'Vert rode like a luxury car over uneven pavement. Well, maybe not a luxury car, but the bumps we expected to shake our spine were muffled somewhere in the XKR's suspension. Do the dampers ruin the XKR Convertible's performance pretense? Well, let's just say that on a daily basis you'll use the car's forgiving ride more than its capacity to carve corners anyway.
We'd be remiss if we didn't mention the newest Jag that was just revealed, the 2009 Jaguar XF, before ending this review. We were hoping after the production XF was unveiled that we could say the XK and its variants weren't the only fetching felines offered by Jaguar, but alas, we can't. The XF's exterior didn't fare so well on its way from concept to production model, so the XK remains the most attractive Jag available. And if you add an 'R' on the end, it just gets better.
All Photos Copyright © John Neff / Weblogs, Inc.

















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Ligor @ Aug 30th 2007 12:19PM
so the Cavalier headlights, The older Ford Taurus grill and some Mazda 6 tailight combine to make what you refer to as 'objects of automotive sex'
IMHO this is one ugly car.
sometimes the automotive press needs some glasses to see what's in front of them besides the badge.
Rene Curry @ Aug 30th 2007 12:37PM
I totally agree, this car is ugly! They need an immediate redesign plan.
Watch the sales numbers to see if we are wrong. The older XK8/XKR is much sexier.
The new 4 door is gorgous, let's see if they can bring that to market in the form that we are seeing.
m. @ Aug 30th 2007 12:50PM
I am worried about your eyes. You see that add on the bottom LasikPlus vision center - no wonder they advertise on the Autoblog.
RickCA @ Aug 30th 2007 1:12PM
Ligor I couldn't agree with you more!! This is nothing but an overpriced two door Ford Taurus! It's hidiously boring to look at the seats even look straight out of a Taurus of yester year. Everything from the outdated cluster gauge that looks like something out of the 90's and is that FAUX wood in a Jag???.... Boring and ugly sorry no disrespect to the designers but if this is what you put to market to save a dying company....? Although i reluctanly admit to seeing a few already cruising LA
m. @ Aug 30th 2007 1:35PM
What is wrong with you LigorLikes? This car at least looks like Jag. They had that grill years before before any Taurus.
What are you going to see next, A Brazilian Monkey in this cat? Its a nice Jaguar - you don't like it, buy yourself a Bentley oh wait that looks like Huynday or buy Rolls, aaah that looks like Chrysler....perhaps buy Audi? no, looks like new VW..... better of walking??
Seminole @ Aug 30th 2007 3:25PM
You don't know your car history Ligor.
The grille is actually modeled on the old Jaguar E-type. http://www.msmeet.com/Bildarkiv/Traffen04/original/etype4.JPG . The designers of the Ford Taurus actually copied the grille design. The only reason people as naive as yourself mistake the new XK grille for a Taurus, is because the Taurus was a much more mainstream car then the E-Type, hence people associate the design with the Taurus.
You also must have never seen a Mazda 6, as those tail lights look nothing like the 6's.
The car has amazing design, the same guy who designed the DB7 and Vanquish, Ian Callum, designed the XK. It has many of the same styling cues, for 10's of thousands less.
Seminole @ Aug 30th 2007 3:37PM
Oh and RickCA,
First read my post above regarding the Taurus grille. Second, this is the seat out of a new XK:
http://www.familycar.com/RoadTests/JaguarXK/Images/FrontSeats-md.jpg
This is the seat out of a Taurus:
http://images.autotrader.com/images/2007/8/2/227/645/2586714435.227645622.IM1.03.565x421_A.562x421.jpg
They look nothing alike!
How can you call the cluster gauge outdated? I wasn't aware that cluster gauges of "yesteryear" had LCD displays like the one on the Jag: http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/ab_jagxkr_450_33.jpg
And for your last point, IT'S REAL WOOD MORON! I think, and I may be mixing up my cars, but I think Jaguar actually selects each piece of wood in the whole car from the same tree, then sends them off to get polished and formed into the correct pieces. Each piece has a bar code on it to identify which car it goes back to, so every piece of wood in the car matches perfectly.
I'm really tired of idiots like you who know nothing about cars acting like you do.
F451 @ Aug 31st 2007 3:56AM
This model does not do it for me. My wife and I were at a restaurant, and a new one showed-up. The owner parked it all caddywhompus, backing it in, and standing by it. One person walked-up to him to talk about it, but the Aston Martin V8 Vantage, just a couple of cars away, received by far more onlookers.
Frank @ Sep 8th 2007 12:49AM
This is just a glorified Fort Taurus, nothing new.
Nothing what one would expect from Jaguar !!!
TriShield @ Aug 30th 2007 12:24PM
Ligor, you sound like the one that needs a prescription.
Geoff @ Aug 30th 2007 12:52PM
Outstanding post... great that comments about features link to pictures about the comment.
Jaguars are like Apple Products... you're either a "fanboy" or not. While I have been a jag owner for nearly 30 years even back in the "buy two so you have one as a spare" days. I agree with the comments that it has a vaguely old style Taurus "carp mouth".
Look forward to more well integrated posts like this.
Aetius @ Aug 30th 2007 12:55PM
Are you guys kidding me? Ever seen a XK on the road? They have more character in their door-handles than an entire 5 Series does. This car is gorgeous. I used to think of Jaguar as a Buick-brand. Since I've seen the XKs, I've changed my mind and if I can ever afford an expensive car, I'll pick this over any of the Germans cars. Easily.
Spiel @ Aug 30th 2007 1:46PM
To say you don't really care for the XK is one thing (your opinion), but to say it's "ugly" and a copy of sub-par cars is just a little of exaggeration.
Just saw a red XKR the other day, it was so beautiful.
Todd @ Aug 30th 2007 1:47PM
You guys are idiots. This car is actually beautiful in person. I would take the coupe version, though.
G-man @ Aug 30th 2007 1:54PM
Rick, your comments about the XK only show how little you know about cars. A taurus? Dude get your brain checked.
Thats like saying a Lexus LS460 is just a gussied up camry with a v8.
The XK is sexier than any other car in its class. And thats a fact.
etube @ Aug 30th 2007 2:24PM
Why would anyone buy this car when they can get an SL550, that has a better interior and better ride.
EquinsuOcha @ Aug 30th 2007 6:21PM
Please, put the crack pipe down. The SL550 is not even remotely close to the XKR. Mercedes leather's are hard as a rock and the interior design, seat controls, and materials are something straight out of the Sebring parts bin compared to the Jag. Besides having a higher price point and less options, the SL's navigation and GUI systems are pathetic when put side to side to an Accord, let alone the XKR. The SL, like the LS430, and the M6 ride like a brick compared to the XK.
The XKR quietly projects class, power and sophistication, while the SL screams "look at me! Aren't I a name dropping social climber!".
retsel @ Aug 30th 2007 2:31PM
i think that Jaguar is a brand that people love to hate... it has some serious potential as a brand... but it cant seem to hit that home run... the XF was a great chance... but the front end missed the boat... (that front might have looked good on the next XJ) everything else is perfect...
but the xk is the hotness... if i can have any car in the world it would be an xkr portfolio...
peace....
Bryan @ Aug 30th 2007 8:39PM
I love this car!
vlad_40 @ Aug 30th 2007 11:22PM
Having owned 3 Jaguars now, I think they did an admirable job with this latest one. My last was a 1999 XK8 convertible (triple black).
The only thing wrong that I see is that the newest one (especially in the XKR) is that it has too much "bling" as well as a smaller trunk.
My next one will not be an "R" because I don't care for the eye-grabbing side vents and the silly vented hood. Truthfully, it needs neither the hood vents nor the side vents. They both take away from the beauty and flow of the design.
This is a GT in the nicest sense of the word. It is NOT a track car. It should get you where you are going with comfort, sufficient power, and a feeling of wellbeing while you are getting there.
With all the cars in the world to choose from, the XK8 convertible is still my favorite, regardless of price.