
Greenpeace staged a protest (what a surprise) outside Porsche's Zuffenhausen plant today, carrying on about how the company's vehicles are "Climate Pigs," complete with a pink Cayenne Turbo dressed up in pig ears and a porker's nose. (We wonder, did the Greenpeaceniks drive their Porcine Cayenne to the protest? Because if they did, helloooo hypocrisy.) The argument is nothing new, with the organization upset because Porsche is (in their eyes) an enemy of Gaia. You see, it has the temerity to build thrilling cars that aren't ultralights in terms of consumption. Greenpeace must be on tour through Germany this week, as they pulled the same stunt at BMW on Monday. Porsche welcomed the protesters with the snarky banner shown above.
Follow the jump for more info and commentary.
[Sources: Greenpeace, Porsche]
It wasn't the only banner, either. One detailed facts that inconveniently countered the Greenpeace rhetoric. That one, entitled "Good To Know," included the following bullet points:
- "Porsche's contribution to CO2 emissions in traffic less than 0.1 per cent. "
- "Porsche has the lowest CO2 emissions per horsepower."
- "Porsche will reduce CO2 emissions by more than 20 per cent by the year 2012."
- "Porsche is introducing the hybrid engine: less than 9 litres fuel consumption on 100 km."
Greenpeace's ax to grind with Porsche stems from the automaker's opposition to a flat European CO2 emissions limit applying to all cars from all manufacturers. Porsche's argument is that since it builds luxury performance vehicles that incorporate numerous technology, safety and comfort features, it is impossible (and in our view, ridiculous and unfair) to compare them to the compact and subcompact cars that would obviously be favored by such legislation. Porsche instead advocates a tiered system that sets aggressive limits on a per-vehicle-class basis, which would take additional factors into account.
Frankly, when it comes to innovations designed to reduce fuel consumption and vehicle emissions, we have a lot more faith in the engineers at an automaker like Porsche, which just gave us a 530-horsepower, 200 mph sports car capable of almost 19 mpg in the New European Driving Cycle, than a bunch of protest goons looking for camera time.
Porsche's parting shot at Greenpeace was contained in a final banner that read, "Dear Friends from Greenpeace: Porsche is Better than You Think. But the Good News is that David taking on Goliath was Underestimated, too . . ."
You can read Greenpeace's account of the protest at their German site here. (Click here for English translation.)
Porsche's press release follows below:
PRESS RELEASE:
Premiere of a Special Kind for the First Time in Zuffenhausen
Porsche Welcomes Greenpeace "Climate Pigs" with its Own Posters
Stuttgart. For the first time in the history of the company now going back almost 60 years, Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG in Stuttgart received a visit today from Greenpeace. The company took the opportunity to welcome the environmental organisation with a big poster proudly stating "Done It! Greenpeace Demonstration at Porsche. Now We Have Really Made It!" rolled out at the entrance to Porsche's Home Plant in Zuffenhausen as a particularly warm sign of appreciation.
Greenpeace accused the company of building cars they claimed to be "climate pigs". Porsche vehemently rejected this accusation and informed the activists that less than 12 per cent of all exhaust emissions in Germany come from passenger cars, with Porsche's share therein being less than one-tenth of 1 per cent. Power stations alone, for example, account for 43 per cent, industry accounts for 16 per cent, and private households 14 per cent. Porsche presented its counter-arguments on a second large poster bearing the headline "Good to Know" followed by impressive facts and figures:
"Porsche's contribution to CO2 emissions in traffic less than 0.1 per cent. "
"Porsche has the lowest CO2 emissions per horsepower."
"Porsche will reduce CO2 emissions by more than 20 per cent by the year 2012."
"Porsche is introducing the hybrid engine: less than 9 litres fuel consumption on 100 km."
To refer to Porsche as a "climate pig", given these facts, is not only inappropriate, but also malicious and a clear sign of bad intent. All the more so as Porsche has emphasised time and again that the CO2 emissions of all Porsche cars are reduced by 1.7 per cent each year. This is an improvement only few other manufacturers are able to match. A further point is that Porsche sports cars are already able today to run on up to 10 per cent bio-fuel (ethanol), ensuring a further improvement of the CO2 balance amounting to the same figure. And the new Cayenne is even able to run on up to 25 per cent ethanol.
A further significant point is that by the end of this decade Porsche will be offering a hybrid version of the Cayenne. And the objective in this case, in terms of fuel consumption, is to have an "8" before the decimal point – that is less than 9.0 litres fuel consumption on 100 kilometres – or better than 31.4 mpg imp. Porsche's fourth model series, finally, the Panamera Gran Turismo scheduled to enter the market in 2009, will likewise be available with a hybrid power unit.
Porsche also told the Greenpeace activists that they build premium class cars offering technical features, motoring comfort and safety of the very highest standard, making it impossible to compare a Porsche with a small compact car. Precisely for this reason, the Stuttgart manufacturer is opposed to a common CO2 limit applicable to the car fleets of all car makers in general. Instead, Porsche advocates CO2 emission standards oriented towards individual market segments or categories of cars – with such standards by all means being ambitious and demanding.
Concluding the demonstration, Porsche could not resist the temptation to unroll a third large poster stating: "Dear Friends from Greenpeace: Porsche is Better than You Think. But the Good News is that David taking on Goliath was Underestimated, too . . .".












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Evotec @ Jul 26th 2007 3:56PM
i hate most actions of greenpeace.
Rambo @ Jul 26th 2007 5:07PM
Go Greenpeace! I HATE PORSCHE!
It unacceptable if mass market automakers have high fuel consumption and emissions but those RULES SHOULDN'T APPLY TO THE RICH?!
ermax18 @ Jul 27th 2007 9:06AM
Rambo, you sound like socialist. Let me guess.. your voting for HELLary? She would love so penalize the "successful" hard working people. Wouldn't that make you happy?
Don @ Jul 27th 2007 3:41PM
Get lost "greenies"!
Cameron @ Jul 26th 2007 3:56PM
Commence flame war.
Shouldn't Greenpeace be out ramming whaling ships? No amount of protesting is going to change the automotive industry, it's the backbone of our modern economy. The only way to make a point is with your dollars.
This is coming from a godless liberal socialist tree-hugging atheist.
Nellydesign @ Jul 26th 2007 4:13PM
I thought it more likely that they should be out "ramming" whales...
Eric @ Jul 26th 2007 3:57PM
Step 1: Buy Porsche, waste environment-unfriendly paint to make in pink.
Step 2: Waste gas driving it there
Step 3: Profit!...errr look like hypocrits.
Nick @ Jul 26th 2007 4:10PM
exactly my thinking, porsche even have a hybrid program and yet they still resort to this.
Arnie @ Jul 26th 2007 3:57PM
I hope they don't fart at Greenpeace. That's bad for Gaia.
j.tuck @ Jul 26th 2007 4:00PM
Didn't Clarkson point out in his Top Gear review off the 911 turbo that the air coming out of the tailpipes of said car would actually be cleaner then the air going into the intake from our more polluted cities? I'm all for clean air, and the Cayenne is rediculous, but I'm with Porsche on this one. Greenpeace should focus their efforts on bigger polluters.
Eric @ Jul 26th 2007 8:22PM
I think Greenpeace should buy me a 911 Turbo and pay me to drive it around L.A. all day long, cleaning up the air.
why not the LS2LS7? @ Jul 27th 2007 12:26PM
You need to stop believing the stuff Clarkson says. The show is about entertainment, not accuracy.
Here:
http://www.driveclean.ca.gov/en/gv/driveclean/vtype_cleaner.asp
'Cars with a PZEV emissions rating have such tight pollution controls, and the burning of fuel is so complete, that in very smoggy urban areas, exhaust out of the tailpipe can actually be cleaner than the air outside. '
From here:
http://www.epa.gov/autoemissions/smcar-07.htm
The 911 Turbo scores a 7 on trace emissions.
From here:
http://www.epa.gov/autoemissions/about.htm
A 7 is tier 2 bin 4, which is just barely better than LEV II, and is nowhere near SULEV II/PZEV.
So the 911 Turbo isn't one of those cars that you can say the air coming out of the tailpipe might be even cleaner than the air going in in polluted areas.
And from the detailed chart (change slashes, autoblog won't let me put 4 URLs in)
http:\\www.epa.gov\autoemissions\detailedchart.pdf
A 911 emits twice the nitrogen oxides, 7 times the NMOG (another smog producing greenhouse gas) and double the CO as a PZEV.
And to be honest, none of this matters because these are all trace emissions, it's really the CO2 Greenpeace is bitching about. CO2 is basically directly proportional to fuel consumption, which is why they put the Cayenne out there.
And I don't buy the defense of Porsche saying they dare to make exciting cars. The Cayenne is not exciting. The Cayenne is a simple cash-in on the SUV craze, and it gets truly AWFUL gas mileage due to Porsche's ham-handed efforts to distinguish it from the pack (like its Touareg twin).
why not the LS2LS7? @ Jul 27th 2007 12:27PM
You need to stop believing the stuff Clarkson says. The show is about entertainment, not accuracy.
Here:
http://www.driveclean.ca.gov/en/gv/driveclean/vtype_cleaner.asp
'Cars with a PZEV emissions rating have such tight pollution controls, and the burning of fuel is so complete, that in very smoggy urban areas, exhaust out of the tailpipe can actually be cleaner than the air outside. '
From here:
http://www.epa.gov/autoemissions/smcar-07.htm
The 911 Turbo scores a 7 on trace emissions.
From here:
http://www.epa.gov/autoemissions/about.htm
A 7 is tier 2 bin 4, which is just barely better than LEV II, and is nowhere near SULEV II/PZEV.
So the 911 Turbo isn't one of those cars that you can say the air coming out of the tailpipe might be even cleaner than the air going in in polluted areas.
And from the detailed chart (change slashes, autoblog won't let me put 4 URLs in)
http:\\www.epa.gov\autoemissions\detailedchart.pdf
A 911 emits twice the nitrogen oxides, 7 times the NMOG (another smog producing greenhouse gas) and double the CO as a PZEV.
And to be honest, none of this matters because these are all trace emissions, it's really the CO2 Greenpeace is bitching about. CO2 is basically directly proportional to fuel consumption, which is why they put the Cayenne out there.
And I don't buy the defense of Porsche saying they dare to make exciting cars. The Cayenne is not exciting. The Cayenne is a simple cash-in on the SUV craze, and it gets truly AWFUL gas mileage due to Porsche's ham-handed efforts to distinguish it from the pack (like its Touareg twin).
why not the LS2LS7? @ Jul 27th 2007 12:27PM
You need to stop believing the stuff Clarkson says. The show is about entertainment, not accuracy.
Here:
http://www.driveclean.ca.gov/en/gv/driveclean/vtype_cleaner.asp
'Cars with a PZEV emissions rating have such tight pollution controls, and the burning of fuel is so complete, that in very smoggy urban areas, exhaust out of the tailpipe can actually be cleaner than the air outside. '
From here:
http://www.epa.gov/autoemissions/smcar-07.htm
The 911 Turbo scores a 7 on trace emissions.
From here:
http://www.epa.gov/autoemissions/about.htm
A 7 is tier 2 bin 4, which is just barely better than LEV II, and is nowhere near SULEV II/PZEV.
So the 911 Turbo isn't one of those cars that you can say the air coming out of the tailpipe might be even cleaner than the air going in in polluted areas.
And from the detailed chart (change slashes, autoblog won't let me put 4 URLs in)
http:--www.epa.gov-autoemissions-detailedchart.pdf
A 911 emits twice the nitrogen oxides, 7 times the NMOG (another smog producing greenhouse gas) and double the CO as a PZEV.
And to be honest, none of this matters because these are all trace emissions, it's really the CO2 Greenpeace is bitching about. CO2 is basically directly proportional to fuel consumption, which is why they put the Cayenne out there.
And I don't buy the defense of Porsche saying they dare to make exciting cars. The Cayenne is not exciting. The Cayenne is a simple cash-in on the SUV craze, and it gets truly AWFUL gas mileage due to Porsche's ham-handed efforts to distinguish it from the pack (like its Touareg twin).
why not the LS2LS7? @ Jul 27th 2007 12:28PM
You need to stop believing the stuff Clarkson says. The show is about entertainment, not accuracy.
Here:
http://www.driveclean.ca.gov/en/gv/driveclean/vtype_cleaner.asp
'Cars with a PZEV emissions rating have such tight pollution controls, and the burning of fuel is so complete, that in very smoggy urban areas, exhaust out of the tailpipe can actually be cleaner than the air outside. '
From here:
http://www.epa.gov/autoemissions/smcar-07.htm
The 911 Turbo scores a 7 on trace emissions.
From here:
http://www.epa.gov/autoemissions/about.htm
A 7 is tier 2 bin 4, which is just barely better than LEV II, and is nowhere near SULEV II/PZEV.
So the 911 Turbo isn't one of those cars that you can say the air coming out of the tailpipe might be even cleaner than the air going in in polluted areas.
And from the detailed chart (change slashes, autoblog won't let me put 4 URLs in)
http:--www.epa.gov-autoemissions-detailedchart.pdf
A 911 emits twice the nitrogen oxides, 7 times the NMOG (another smog producing greenhouse gas) and double the CO as a PZEV.
And to be honest, none of this matters because these are all trace emissions, it's really the CO2 Greenpeace is bitching about. CO2 is basically directly proportional to fuel consumption, which is why they put the Cayenne out there.
And I don't buy the defense of Porsche saying they dare to make exciting cars. The Cayenne is not exciting. The Cayenne is a simple cash-in on the SUV craze, and it gets truly AWFUL gas mileage due to Porsche's ham-handed efforts to distinguish it from the pack (like its Touareg twin).
why not the LS2LS7? @ Jul 27th 2007 12:28PM
You need to stop believing the stuff Clarkson says. The show is about entertainment, not accuracy.
Here:
http://www.driveclean.ca.gov/en/gv/driveclean/vtype_cleaner.asp
'Cars with a PZEV emissions rating have such tight pollution controls, and the burning of fuel is so complete, that in very smoggy urban areas, exhaust out of the tailpipe can actually be cleaner than the air outside. '
From here:
http://www.epa.gov/autoemissions/smcar-07.htm
The 911 Turbo scores a 7 on trace emissions.
From here:
http://www.epa.gov/autoemissions/about.htm
A 7 is tier 2 bin 4, which is just barely better than LEV II, and is nowhere near SULEV II/PZEV.
So the 911 Turbo isn't one of those cars that you can say the air coming out of the tailpipe might be even cleaner than the air going in in polluted areas.
And from the detailed chart (change slashes, autoblog won't let me put 4 URLs in)
http:--www.epa.gov-autoemissions-detailedchart.pdf
A 911 emits twice the nitrogen oxides, 7 times the NMOG (another smog producing greenhouse gas) and double the CO as a PZEV.
And to be honest, none of this matters because these are all trace emissions, it's really the CO2 Greenpeace is bitching about. CO2 is basically directly proportional to fuel consumption, which is why they put the Cayenne out there.
And I don't buy the defense of Porsche saying they dare to make exciting cars. The Cayenne is not exciting. The Cayenne is a simple cash-in on the SUV craze, and it gets truly AWFUL gas mileage due to Porsche's ham-handed efforts to distinguish it from the pack (like its Touareg twin).
MJL @ Jul 26th 2007 4:04PM
Would Autoblog kindly suggest a practicable more environmentally efficient way to get the Cayenne there besides driving it themselves??
Compy386 @ Jul 26th 2007 4:07PM
How about not using an actual Cayenne.
Hamud @ Jul 26th 2007 4:09PM
Pushing the car??? :D
Sometimes I guess that GP is just an attention whore...
Nellydesign @ Jul 26th 2007 4:15PM
I think they should have carried it using an earth shaped balloon filled with baby smiles...