Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.











Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
Ed Hays @ Aug 29th 2007 4:30PM
This seem to be the forum to vent my frustration about Chrysler's decision to include a Lifetime Powertrain Warranty on all 2007 vehicles purchased from July 26th onward. Over 450,000 customers, myself included, purchased our 2007 Chrysler Corportaion vehicles before July 26th. Unfortunately, we are limited to the 36 mo/ 36,000 mi. warranty. My complaint to Chrysler about this was answered with regrets and an invitation to visit my dealer to inquire about my vehicle's eligibility and to invite me to consider the purchase of an Extended Service Contract. My contention is that purchasers of 2007 Chrysler vehicles, prior to the July 26 date, have been terribly wronged and summarly dismissed. This warranty is not just some dollar off promotion for purchasing the car at a certain time of the year; it is a significant value-added lifetime benefit that has been added during the middle of a current modell year run at the expense of all prior purchasers. As the new owners of Chrysler Corporation, this is certainly no way for Cerberus Capital Management to add to or maintain a loyal customer base. But then again, with the hiring of Bob Nardelli and his bottom line school of management, this may be the intended future path of the new Chrysler Corporation. If there was ever an argument for a class action suit, this seems to be a prime example of a textbook case for one.