Ford Flex spied curbside
Click for gallery of additional spy shots
A reader Brandon sent in the shots you see here, which show that the Ford Flex is coming along fine. Parked curbside, this particular Flex is fully undisguised, but for reasons known only to Ford, it's not sporting its Flex badges. Yes, it's not scheduled to show up until next year as an '09 model, but still, we don't understand why automakers play coy like this with stuff they've already revealed. After all, the Flex was officially introduced in April at the New York Auto Show. Just badge these development rides all the way and get people on the street talking, already.
Anyway, the Flex snagged on the street looks just like what we eyeballed in NY. This one appears to be a model below the "Limited" trim, as it's got regular-looking wheels and a body-color rear gate and roof. The big Ford crossover will do battle with high-capacity people movers like the GMC Acadia, Saturn Outlook, and Buick Enclave from GM when it finally shows up at dealerships.
Thanks for the heads-up and the photos, Brandon!
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Brian Dreggors 11:45AM (7/16/2007)
Probably doesn't bear any badging because Ford's looking into a name change. Or should. I would. Flex is a horrible name for this car. What was wrong with Fairlane?
Reply
toledo 12:04PM (7/16/2007)
I hope you are correct. From what I've seen so far, I like the looks of the vehicle, but I HATE the Flex name.
Alan Mullaly are you listening? HATE THE NAME!!!!! Even "Pinto" would be better than "Flex"....
Don 3:55PM (7/16/2007)
That thing is decidedly not as good looking as I first thought.
J.Crew 11:53AM (7/16/2007)
Good snag on the street, too bad no interior shots though. I spied a Caliber SRT4 in Windsor, ON with Michigan tags on it over the weekend. I was pissed I had no camera with me.
Reply
Ninad 1:13PM (7/16/2007)
How about these?
Interior Shot
[URL=http://img76.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc001432bk3.jpg][IMG]http://img76.imageshack.us/img76/3055/dsc001432bk3.th.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
Spoke to some Ford personnel. It is expected to ship with options including panoramic sunroof, dvd player etc. Build quality looked like it was better than on current Fords. Although the interior was quite good, the materials are still way off from matching german competitors.
The white plastic bottom part of the dashboard actually has a mesh-like finish.
Ninad 1:17PM (7/16/2007)
Correct Link:
http://img76.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc001432bk3.jpg
djhamel2 11:55AM (7/16/2007)
Wow, it's a lot bigger than I thought. The shot with the XC70 passing by on the street gives a good sense of scale.
Reply
1337 11:55AM (7/16/2007)
Ford now SIX SUVs (okay, some of them are more wagons than SUVs)--Escape, Edge, Taurus X, Explorer, and Expedition. Ford needs to stop pouring so much money into these road hogs and to start investing in the development of a Focus replacement for the American market.
Reply
1337 11:56AM (7/16/2007)
(Six not counting the new Flex, which has yet to hit showrooms.)
Tyk 12:08PM (7/16/2007)
Don't forget all the near identical Mercury and Lincoln variants...
... 12:09PM (7/16/2007)
that looks like 5 to me
ItGuy 12:37PM (7/16/2007)
For who? The 10 people who still buy the small deathtraps?
For many a midsize sedan or CUV with decent (25-30) MPG is what we need. I don't want to cram the family/dog/luggage into a Focus wagon. Now a Flex or Edge would fit the bill nicely.
psarhjinian 12:45PM (7/16/2007)
Now, to be fair, a Focus wagon would be safer (in the "rollover and accident avoidance" sense of the word) than any of the SUVs, while carrying more than the Escape or (possibly) the Edge. Build a Focus wagon on the newer platform, and it's probably about as safe as it's larger brethren overall.
Remember, while "normal" collisions are more common, rollovers and skids are more often fatal, and taller vehicles do kill more people per their percentage of collisions than smaller, lower ones do.
I like this, and I like the Edge, too. I'd still prefer an updated Focus wagon (or a Fusion wagon!) over either.
Elliott 12:45PM (7/16/2007)
4Runner, FJ Cruiser, Highlander, Land Cruiser, Rav4, Sequoia, Sienna
I agree Ford should be hard at work on a new Focus, but I don't think the SUV/CUV is market that can be ignored either. Plus sources say you can wave goodbye to the Taurus X in a couple years.
EnviroBob 2:03PM (7/16/2007)
So let's see, Toyota has six SUV / CUV offerings, plus the three Lexus badge engineered versions, and that's acceptable. Ford has five, plus two Mercury and two Lincoln versions and that's too many. Hmmm...
john 6:10PM (7/16/2007)
How many SUV's do they have at the Toyota store. Let's count them everyone; 1. RAV4, 2. 4 Runner, 3, FJ Cruiser, 4, Highlander, 5 Sequia, 6. Land Cruiser.
Why crticize Ford for finally giving consumers what they want.
Let's see how Ford competes with each one:
RAV 4 vs Escape Competitive Battle each has it's plusses and minuses
4Runner vs Explorer Explorer handily beats it in features and packaging
Sequia vs Expededition No comparision, Expedition is better in virtually all area's including quality
Highlander vs Taurus X vs Edge As a seven passenger the Highlander probally beats the Taurus X until you compare prices, The Edge is far and away the only one with any style though
Land Cruiser vs Expedition The Land Cruiser is a high quality vehicle but it really is a niche vehicle, the Expedition beats it almost every catagory other then off-road and longgevity.
david damn 12:08PM (7/16/2007)
How can this thing compete with the Lambda crossovers from GM? Sure, it's not the Ford 'Aztec', but compared to the GMC Acadia or Saturn (name?), this is really boring... dare I say, minivan-ish. I'm a sad Ford fan today.
Reply
srivendel 12:13PM (7/16/2007)
I would MUCH rather drive this than any of GM's Lambda crossovers. The upscale version with the white roof and alumilook talkgate looks awesome. Plus it will handle like a big car, instead of like a top heavy big car like the Lambdas. I think this thing will be huge, especially if they change the name back to Fairlane.
Mr. Oak 12:13PM (7/16/2007)
I agree with you 100%.
psarhjinian 12:37PM (7/16/2007)
It's boring, yes, but it's also not nearly as tacky as the GM Lambda crossovers. Ford can go a little chrome-crazy, but the lines and detail are clean. Other than the Jellybean Taurus, Ford's designs usually age well.
GM's gotten better since the Aztec days, but they still have very little restraint when it comes to keeping it simple. Everything that comes out of GM tends to look a little clown-car. Saab used to be immune to this, but since the 2006 9-5 even they've been whacked with the ugly stick. They eventually end up as "classics", but they go through an extended "tacky-as-hell" phase first.