<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/13/more-info-on-gms-diesel-plans-in-the-u-s/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/13/more-info-on-gms-diesel-plans-in-the-u-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/13/more-info-on-gms-diesel-plans-in-the-u-s/</guid><description><![CDATA["For those that aren't registered with or subscribers to Automotive News, the same article has been posted on sister publication AutoWeek:"<br><br>Is it a badge engineering job?  I.e. did they just slap the same write-up from the paid site to the free site?  If so, if that was GM then hell would be paid for badge engineering so blatantly.  You know, the folks that pay money for Automotive News deserve a little more than those who don't pay at autoweek don't you think? <br><br>LMAO.  I know, you guys weren't "trained" to care about it from anyone else but the domestic car companies.  Don't worry, I understand.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lithous]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 13th 2007 12:08PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>