Filed under: In the Autoblog Garage, Crossovers/CUVs, Ford, First Drive
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Ford Taurus X Limited

Click on the Taurus X for a high-res gallery of the latest Ford CUV
Before the Honda Accord and then the Toyota Camry took over the top of the sales charts, the Ford Taurus was the number one selling car in the United States. During the final years of its lifetime the Taurus became the darling of daily rental fleets, with the bulk of its still-prodigious sales going there rather than to retail customers like its competition. This also meant in part that residual values for Taurus were the lowest in its class. As the Taurus era came to an end, Ford decided to make a clean break and split the previous sedan/wagon lineup into three distinct vehicles with new names. Thus was born the smaller, lower-cost Fusion sedan, the larger Five Hundred sedan and the Freestyle crossover wagon. The latter two never made much impact on the market thanks in large part to bland styling and underpowered engines.
Shortly after launch it became known that the Five Hundred and Freestyle would be quickly restyled with the new three bar Ford grille and a bigger engine. Just before their debut at the Chicago Auto Show in February, new CEO Alan Mullaly made the decision to revive the Taurus nameplate for the revamped models and the Freestyle became the new Taurus X. Just a week after production launched at the Chicago assembly plant, Taurus X serial number 70, a Limited AWD model with the new 3.5L V-6 and six-speed automatic was turned over to Autoblog for a week of evaluation.
Find out what it's like to live with the Taurus X after the jump
Gallery: Autoblog Garage: 2008 Ford Taurus X

Going from Freestyle to Taurus X involved more than than just slapping on a new grille and taillights, although that's the aspect that most passers by will immediately notice. And notice they did. People actually stopped to take a look at the big wagon in the Whole Foods parking lot and asked what it was. The new chrome face has utterly transformed the character of the Freestyle by actually giving it some. The overall angular look of the Taurus X is more like a traditional car-based wagon than an SUV, which is fitting since it's based on the previous Volvo S80 platform. The Taurus I drove had the titanium green paint without the two-tone finish that was prevalent on the earlier model to give it that faux SUV look popularized by the Subaru Outback. Two-tone is still available, but to my eye the single color is a more handsome, upscale look. The Saturn Outlook still has a more modern and stylish appearance overall, but the Taurus finally wears the face it should have had from day one.


On the inside the style is carryover, but that's fine because the design is attractive and functional. The plastic wood trim has been changed to simulate a different style of wood, but it's still plastic. If you're not going to use real tree parts, please don't bother. There's plenty of storage space throughout the interior, including deep, wide pockets in all four door panels with Ford's now customary cup holders molded in. The door cup holders will easily hold a half liter bottle of your favorite beverage. A decent sized compartment in the the dash above the center stack can hold the usual assortment of electronic toys including iPods , phones and assorted other gear. A roof mounted console has a compartment suitable for glasses or garage door openers. The front and second rows each have a center console with a deep bin that easily holds all manner of cameras, DVDs, books and other detritus. The front console has A/C vents for the second-row passengers on its back end in addition to the roof-mounted ones.


The standard seating configuration accommodates seven passengers in a two-three-two layout, although the test unit had the six-seater setup with the second row console. Getting into the back row is relatively easy thanks to the one-touch flip and fold second row seats. The raised rear roof allows for theater-style seating with the third row elevated to allow the rear passengers to see out the front. The third row seatbacks are pretty short and best suited to juveniles, although headroom was plentiful for my 5'10'' frame. The middle row seats offer plenty of room and feature both fore-aft and recline adjustments.

The front seats proved to be comfortable for a run from Ann Arbor to Muskegon to retrieve our young camper, although as with the Escape, the bottom seat cushions were a little short on thigh support. Many vehicles, including the Taurus X, offer heated front seats. In the X, the second row seats are also heated and perforated center inserts on both of the front two rows provide some ventilation on hot days.
Taurus X's interior offers a number of configuration options that allow drivers to take advantage of the middle name in CUV. The third row seats can individually flip forward, leaving a deep luggage well in the back, or flip back around into the well leaving a flat load area for larger loads. The second row and the front passenger seatbacks also flip forward, allowing for objects up to nine feet long to be carried on one side while still leaving seating for three people. Accessing the cargo area is easy with the remote power liftgate. Unlike the Outlook, the tailgate always opened and closed consistently with a double press of the button on the key.
Our Taurus X was loaded with every option except for the moonroof, including the satellite navigation system and the rear seat family entertainment system. That latter option includes a roof mounted DVD player with flip down screen and auxiliary inputs. Although the manual specifically states that the player can handle DVD-r/DVD-rw discs, the test unit failed to read any of the half dozen burned discs I tried, but played all the commercial discs without issue. In spite of the MPAA's aversion to consumers' rights, it seems to perfectly logical to take a backup copy of a DVD on road trip and leave the original at home, especially if the kids in the back are the ones actually loading the discs. The entertainment system does have auxiliary inputs that allow you to plug in a video iPod or game console and play that on the screen. Given the problems playing burned discs, the $1,000 price tag might be better spent on a portable DVD player with two screens and a couple of iPod Nanos for the kids. At least the portable player will usually play burned discs, and you can also take it on a plane when needed. Driving the Taurus X was actually a more pleasant experience than the Saturn Outlook we tried recently. It's amazing what a difference eight hundred pounds makes in a vehicle. While the Taurus is by no means nimble at 4,200 pounds, it certainly didn't have any of the ponderous feel of the Outlook. The Taurus is similar in length but narrower and not as tall as the GM crossover and definitely has more carlike ride and handling characteristics. When equipped with the towing package, the Taurus can drag 2,000 lbs compared to 3,500 for the Outlook and has a maximum seating capacity that's one less as well.
The new 3.5L engine is a huge improvement over the old 3.0L in both the Taurus sedan and this wagon. It feels much stronger and never seems to strain itself. Dipping into the throttle brings effortless acceleration and pulling out to pass triggers smooth quick downshifts from the new six-speed which has replaced the discontinued CVT. That transmission was a joint effort between Ford and GM and also finds a home in GM's Lambda crossovers. Unlike the GM application Ford doesn't offer a manual shift mode, but frankly it isn't needed in a vehicle like this anyway. The steering effort is nicely weighted but pretty devoid of feedback. Accelerating through freeway on-ramps demonstrated mild but sustained understeer but merging with traffic wasn't a problem. The suspension does a good job of keeping Michigan roads at bay without feeling mushy, a trait which unfortunately doesn't apply to the brake pedal most of the time. Under normal braking, the Taurus stoppers provide good deceleration but the pedal has a spongy feel. Stepping on it when sitting at a red light usually provides a sinking feeling. There were at least two exceptions to this during the evaluation when hitting the brakes resulted in a hard pedal, which was quite disconcerting. Some lane changes on gravel roads showed smooth, seamless operation from the stability control system. Unlike the Toyota Tundra, the Taurus system doesn't jerk the wheel around in your hands or make any unnecessary racket, it just feels like a big hand guiding the vehicle where you wanted it to go.


A lot of Ford's engineering efforts on the Taurus and Taurus X for 2008 went into NVH improvements, with a great deal of detail tweaking throughout. The top surfaces of the outside mirrors were sculpted to reduce aerodynamic drag and wind noise, and the change worked. On the road, the Taurus X was nicely hushed -- not quite Lexus-quiet but much better than the Freestyle. Wind noise was almost nonexistent and the sounds that did come through from the engine compartment were muted and never felt strained. A day-long round-trip across Michigan proved to be an effortless run with plenty of room for four to stretch out and no one feeling cramped or particularly cranky at the end.

A week of mixed urban and freeway driving yielded fuel economy of 18.7mpg and the long freeway trip brought that overall average up to 19.3. The Taurus X makes a fine family hauler for those with an aversion to minivans who don't need to do any serious towing. If you need capacity for eight bodies or a heftier towing capacity you'll need to look elsewhere such the Expedition or the various GM choices. With the options on the test vehicle the bottom line price comes in at $37,682 ,although the base SEL front wheel drive model starts at $26,615.
All Photos ©2007 Sam Abuelsamid/ Weblogs, Inc.


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
jayson 12:16PM (7/13/2007)
Sorry you are wrong. The Honda Accord was the number one selling from 1986 to 1992. The Taurus came out in 1986 and gave it a good fight. However in 1992 when the second generation came out is when the Taurus took over as number 1. It held the spot until 1996 when the disaster crap quality Taurus came it. And it was downhill from there.
Reply
toroeau 4:02PM (7/13/2007)
I would have guessed that the original Taurus was #1 for at least a year or two. The next generation, with all the ovals, was #1, but as I recall, Ford was taking a beating selling them at the price required to keep them #1 in sales. The 500 was going to be the 400, but maybe since there had been a Packard 400 they changed it -- or maybe 500 sounds racier.
Guenther 12:34PM (7/13/2007)
Sounds like a nice bundle. 19mpg is kind of low, however. It's a big car, but I'd hope for at least mid 20's in highway cruising. Otherwise, what's the point?
Reply
drolds1 12:57PM (7/13/2007)
Read it again. It says that a long freeway trip brought the overall AVERAGE mileage up to 19.3 from 18.7. He did not say the highway mileage was under 20.
SHF 12:43PM (7/13/2007)
The Fusion did not come from the Taurus. The Fusion is much smaller than the Taurus and, if anything, could be considered as the Contour's replacement. Though the New Taurus (old Five Hundred) appears much larger it is actually only a few inches larger.
Reply
Gregg 6:51PM (7/15/2007)
I know you mean well, but...
The original Taurus (1986-91) was actually smaller than the Fusion. It was not as wide, not as long and had a shorter wheelbase. The Taurus grew, by adding to its overhangs with subsequent re-styles, but it did not get anywhere near to 500 size on the interior or exterior. It was styling run amok.
The Fusion could have easily been the new Taurus. it is roomy, has a large trunk and a longer wheelbase than Taurus had. That they went with converting the 500 is fine...but it is a much larger and roomier car. It is a "large" car, and the Taurus always competed in the Fusion-sized field (and the Fusion is a whole EPA class bigger than the Contour was...not to mention, longer and wider). Anyhow, have a nice day.
SHF 6:56PM (7/19/2007)
I'm not saying this out of anger or anything but in a way your right, but you are mostly wrong.
You see, the Fusion is considered a compact car, just as the Contour was. The Fusion may be bigger than the first Taurus, but then again, we don't live in the late 80's anymore, and cars are simply larger now than before (meaning the late 80's). Take for example the current Honda Civic, it, like the Fusion, is now larger than it's larger sibling, the Accord, from the 80's but we do not say the Civic is actually an Accord.
Fact is, Taurus came in two models, 4-door sedan and a station wagon. Never was there a smaller sedan that also had the Taurus nameplate on it at the same time as the other two. Therefor, the Fusion did not come from the Taurus, it is its own car all its own, and is more closely related to the late Contour. Cars evolve and change from generation to generation, another example is the Mustang which at one point shared platform with some less savior Ford products but is was no less a Mustang, like it or not.
But, I knew you meant well, you just were not thinking it through.
Jared 12:47PM (7/13/2007)
18.7 mpg? That's pathetic.
Reply
Don 2:31PM (7/13/2007)
It's better than what you'd get in a Surburban or Navigator...but it still ain't great.
Nice rig...but $37k? Yikes.
MikeW 12:50PM (7/13/2007)
If you use the OD-off in the 'L' setting, does that give you a second gear start?
Reply
psarhjinian 12:52PM (7/13/2007)
This is a nice car. I do wish it was a little lower-riding--more of a wagon than an SUV--but otherwise it's an underappreciated winner. Consumer Reports liked it, but it was panned by much of the press for a lack of power. Given the choice, I'd still take it over the Pacifica (which isn't as good) and Outlook/Acadia (which is just too damn big-and-blingy for my tastes)
I do wonder what the point is, though, with the Fairla--sorry, Flex--in the wings. Ford's model lineup is looking a little top-heavy, especially with the neutering of the Focus.
Reply
CreepyScoutMaster 12:52PM (7/13/2007)
I was with you until the last paragraph. 19mpg and $37k is a tough sell.
Reply
rob 12:54PM (7/13/2007)
"And notice they did. People actually stopped to take a look at the big wagon in the Whole Foods parking lot and asked what it was."
yeah right...this is bs. its a ford. you're in michigan. do the math. plus, it'd be something else if the grille was new/different/etc. but its not, its very similar to that on most other new fords.
Reply
Clinton 1:37PM (7/13/2007)
Why is that BS? The Detroit area is full of people that are interested in cars and if one of those people happen to see something with the blue oval that is different then before they might ask about it.
More people asked me about my SVT Focus and that was "just" a Ford Focus.
rob 3:29PM (7/13/2007)
hey, i can believe somebody would ask you about your car, after all, its not just a regular old focus. its an SVT focus.
and maybe i could believe a person asked mr. abuelsamid about the taurus x...but "people"? as in, more than one? just while it was in the whole foods parking lot? that's what i'm incredulous about. and rightly so, i'd think.
and for the record, you should never belittle your car.
Guenther 4:22PM (7/13/2007)
Rob- I'm sure no one though that it wasn't a FORD. Rather people might not have known what sort of Ford it was. You're effectively calling someone a liar based on your perception.
Dr.Olds- guessing at the mileage, a weeks worth of driving and a long day trip "up north" (in MI) come out to very similar distance. Doing some rudimentary math, the Highway trip would have been right about 20mpg- I can get that with my fullsize P/U. I realize the car isn't fully broken in yet, and numbers will improve somewhat.
john 7:17PM (7/14/2007)
I must not pay attention to this blog enough. Now I am aware that everything you don't agree with is BS.
Paul 12:59PM (7/13/2007)
The styling changes really improve the look of the car. This is one of those rare "facelifts" that look better than the original.
To bad that same thing can't be said for the standard Taurus (Five Hundred). I have seen two now, one on a dealer lot and the other at the Portland Auto Show back in Feburary (wearing Five Hundred badging). The original may have been unexciting, but at least the design was balanced, and I really hope that they quit with the clear tail lights, they were cool when the IS first came out, but they burned out quickly.
Reply
Mbongo 1:37PM (7/13/2007)
This review is totally wrong. No one asks you not to be a Ford fan. It is totally false to prenetd that this car is far better better that Saturn Outlook. Your review lacks of objectivity and doesn't reserve any attention. Sorry.
Reply
Nellydesign 3:25PM (7/13/2007)
Where, if ever, does this review say that the Taurus X is "far better better" than the Outlook. I'm not really sure you have a point but if you do, it doesn't "reserve" any attention.