Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
BREAKING: Layoffs and executive shuffles at Tesla Motors
SEMA Preview: Dodge bringing Viper-powered Challenger SRT10 Concept
CAR reveals spy shots of McLaren P11 supercar
2010 Chevrolet Camaro priced: LS $22,995, SS $30,995
BREAKING: GM and Chrysler talking about merger
Autoblog Comparo: Moving Mountains - Toyota Landcruiser vs. Hummer H2
First Drive: 2009 Volkswagen Routan
In the Autobog Garage: 2009 Chevy Cobalt SS Turbo
Knight Rider: The Liveblog -- Season 1, Episode 3
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Mazda RX-8 R3, return of the "hummer"
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
psarhjinian @ Jun 25th 2007 11:36PM
Nope, the previous Taurus wasn't bad, but the Panthers (GM/TC/CV) are terrible in collisions. Sure, the frame is easy to repair, but the body built on it crumples like a tin can. And, being such terrible handlers, they can't avoid crashes as well as more modern competitors.
About the only advantage the Panthers have is mass, and even then it's dubious as cars are getting heavier.
On topic: the Freestyle was an excellent performer all around--hopefully the rebadge boosts it's image.