
Click on the photo for a high res gallery of the Saturn Outlook
By coincidence it turned out Alex and I were both scheduled to spend some time with a new Saturn Outlook at about the same time. Alex is working on a full review, so I'll try and give a more succinct take for a change. The Outlook is the diametrical opposite of the original Saturn S-Series weighing in at 5,000 lbs in all-wheel drive form. The new full-size crossover shares it's full-sized Lambda platform with with the GMC Acadia and Buick Enclave.
Each one has it's own unique look and the Saturn has particularly attractive proportions. In photos it looks much smaller than it is, having the style of mid-sized station wagon. If the Outlook body was scaled down to fit on the mid-sized Aura platform it would make an excellent complement to the sedan. It's only when you walk up to the Outlook and it's siblings that you begin to realize that it's within an inch or two of the Tahoe/Yukon in all major dimensions.
Read more of my impressions of the Outlook after the jump

After spending a week with the Aura, stepping up to the Outlook was a bit of a shock. This thing is huge. While the Aura is fairly low slung, you sit up high in the Outlook. The Aura seat wraps around and holds you snugly in place while the Outlook seats are broad and flat. The leather covering the seats does feel good but if you were to corner aggressively you would be looking for something to brace yourself against. Fortunately this kind of behavior probably won't be an issue very often in this high riding crossover.
The interior is easy on the eye and controls fall easily to hand. There are plenty of storage spaces including a good sized bin in the middle of the dash above the center stack. The materials all look high quality, but like the Escape hybrid, only the surfaces you regularly touch such as the armrests are padded. Other surfaces like the dashboard are hard plastic, although they are textured. As with the Escape, it's there if you look for it, but since you don't commonly touch those surfaces it's a cost saver that doesn't have much real negative impact. Another contrast to the Aura is the too-skinny steering wheel although it's not really out of place in this type of vehicle.
Out back behind the third row, there is an extra plastic storage bin under the floor for stashing items you want to keep out of view, or wet towels and bathing suits after a day at the pool or beach. On the left side of the cargo area there was an ill-fitting panel that refused to stay in place throughout the test. The test unit was equipped with the convenience package that includes a power liftgate that also behaved erratically. It often took several presses of the button on the key fob to get the gate to open or close.The riders in the back two rows get to take advantage of a rear seat DVD entertainment system. Since my twelve-year-old son will probably never get to experience a real drive-in theater, he popped up a bowl of popcorn, put in Little Miss Sunshine, climbed into the back row with the wireless headphones that are included and had a driveway drive-in experience. Another nice entertainment feature is audio/video inputs at the back of the center console that allow you plug in other devices like a video iPod.

\As someone who doesn't particularly like trucks, driving the Outlook is not my preferred mode of transportation. It weighs two and a half tons and it feels like it. The ride quality from the four wheel independent suspension and stiff body is definitely more carlike than traditional body-on-frame trucks and it absorbs bumps without creaking or floating around but the steering feels kind of dead. Compared to driving either the Aura or the Escape hybrid the Outlook feels as large and heavy as it is.
All that weight has another price, a thirst for gasoline. If there is any vehicle in the GM lineup that needs the new two-mode hybrid system more than the Tahoe, it's the Outlook and it's siblings. In a week of mixed driving I racked up 420 miles and the truck drank gasoline at the rate of 16.9mpg. The hybrid drivetrain would be a good complement to the smooth, high revving 3.6 V-6 and would help to get the mileage up into the low twenties.
At a price of $39,105 as tested, the Outlook isn't cheap but it's good looking transport for up to eight. Having said that, the new Hyundai Veracruz is similarly powered with at least 600 lbs less mass to haul around, and a price tag that starts at just over $27,000. And Hyundai has an amazing warranty and great quality ratings. If you're looking for a crossover with three rows of seats there is certainly no shortage of options to choose from and plenty more coming in the next year or two.














Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Lithous @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:20PM
" As someone who doesn't particularly like trucks, driving the Outlook is not my preferred mode of transportation."
Then why would you be driving, much less reviewing, this vehicle? Seriously? Do former speed skaters judge figure skaters for a living? Or how about Hockey players. They should be judging figure skating. Makes since.
Lithous @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:22PM
Or "sense" either :)
Though I did not mention anything about "if would make" in the second paragraph of this review. :)
Don @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:52PM
Do you think the reviewers at other major publications get to always review the vehicles they want? No.
Lithous @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:59PM
So Donny baby, no dare to be different? I mean, if you hate large vehicles then just tell the boss you don't want to review large vehicles. ESPECIALLY WHEN ALEX IS ALREADY GOING TO DO A LONGER REVIEW ANYWAY.
Anyway, I'm sticking with my original post. Why would a boss want a guy who hates something anyway to review it?
Don't worry, Alex likes small foreign cars too so he will help back Sam up a little bit anyway.
Don @ Jun 22nd 2007 4:19PM
I take it English isn't your first language?
I don't hate all big, heavy vehicles. I just think the Lambdas should have been lighter and definitely more fuel efficient.
Give rational thought a chance there, buddy.
F451 @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:27PM
Considering that it is the 3.6L V6 engine (an excellent engine), moving around a large vehicle, the gas mileage is not bad for real-world situations.
Scott Hunter @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:58PM
How can you say that 16.9mpg "is not bad for real world situations"? I had a 1978 Jeep Cherokee with a 401 V8 engine, performance 4 barrel carb, full-time 4WD, and probably weighed a lot more! It's gas mileage wasn't much worse than this almost-30-years-newer Saturn Outlook!
Honestly, all of these newer SUVs ought to atleast be getting mid-20s mpg.
Just my $.02
Dave @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:34PM
The new CTS will have a direct injected version of the 3.6 with more power (300+ hp) and better fuel economy.
Hopefully the technology will trickle down quickly.
F451 @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:46PM
Dave,
I'm with you. The 3.6L VVT engine has great potential, and was designed that way. It is certainly an incredibly versatile engine platform.
Lithous @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:40PM
"At a price of $39,105 as tested, the Outlook isn't cheap but it's good looking transport for up to eight. Having said that, the new Hyundai Veracruz is similarly powered with at least 600 lbs less mass to haul around, and a price tag that starts at just over $27,000. And Hyundai has an amazing warranty and great quality ratings. If you're looking for a crossover with three rows of seats there is certainly no shortage of options to choose from and plenty more coming in the next year or two."
Damn, Sam.
Yes, but the Veracruz also has trim model called "Limited" which starts at $34,005. So, showing the nearest low price of one vehicle vs the higher end of another is hardly something of ethics. And GM has a great warranty compared to major car manufacturers and GM also has shown well on some quality polls as well. Remember, this vehicle is more GM than just Saturn.
But just say it. Even though people who normally hate GM think the Lambdas are really good but you still think people should go buy a Hyundai or almost anything else. You and Virgin Island born Kelsey can go have fun with Hyundai.
BTW, when you go to hyundai.com (which most people would think that is where you'd go directly for U.S. car info just like with honda.com which isn't an American company), time how long it takes you to actually get the the site to look up info about the Veracruz. All the links (and slow Website) you have to traverse. Great stuff.
PS, good thing you didn't mention fuel economy of your apparently beloved Veracruz. http://www.hyundaiusa.com/vehicle/veracruz/specs/specs.aspx Assuming real world is lower than stated it should get right around what your Outlook did. Yet, moving 600lbs less.
Do you hate GM or Detroit?
Don @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:56PM
Hate to break it to you, but Motor Trend just got 19.3 mpg out of an AWD Veracruz.
Lithous @ Jun 22nd 2007 4:12PM
There is buddy Donny again.
Did they take the same course as Sam took?
And how do we know that one of the reviewers doesn't hate GM so much that they purposely drove like shit to make sure the mileage was not good? There are people on the saturnfans.com site that get 19 combined (some lower). Like I stated *around* the same.
Also, for a vehicle that is 8 passenger (the GM) vs the Veracruz that is 7 passenger maybe a couple MPG doesn't matter. Hell, I'd even go as far to say that not selling out is worth at least 2 mpg. But I understand, that's just me.
Don @ Jun 22nd 2007 4:21PM
Wow. You're quite the paranoid.
Check around for other tests of the Lambda triplets...16.9 mpg is par for the course.
Lithous @ Jun 22nd 2007 5:34PM
Not "the paranoid" at all as you state. Just wondering. I mean, if it isn't clear that Sam doesn't like large vehicles and is trying to sell the Veracruz for no apparent reason than anyone who is reasonable could ask such a question with Sam's double whammy dislike.
Don @ Jun 22nd 2007 6:43PM
Lith, I think the Lambda triplets are the best looking cars GM's come out with in decades.
I just happen to think they're too heavy and too thirsty.
And I'd die before buying a Veracruz.
Brett @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:44PM
Goodness bad article.
The cover in the rear for the jack is not "ill fitting" but takes some getting used to to keep it closed correctly.
Also you don't "press" the keyfob, you hold it in for three seconds to get the rear power gate to open. Probably why you had trouble. Plus you could have just grabbed the rear latch to see if there was a problem with the liftgate. Also there is a button on the center console that powers it too.
And as far as gas mileage, how did you drive it? Unless you drove it like a granny it's not gunna get the EPA rating. In most of the other reviews out there they got better gas mileage during their tests.
And what the heck is with the Hyundai comment? There is no way in hell their warranty is better than GM's. It's all in black and white. Hyundai warranty = no courtesy transportation, non transferable, deductible charge unless you buy extra coverage, no onstar. And great quality? Not. Maybe their JD Power looks good but the vehicles still fall apart and hold their resale far less then most of the competitors.
oldsmoboi @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:46PM
"At a price of $39,105 as tested, the Outlook isn't cheap but it's good looking transport for up to eight. Having said that, the new Hyundai Veracruz is similarly powered with at least 600 lbs less mass to haul around, and a price tag that starts at just over $27,000. And Hyundai has an amazing warranty and great quality ratings."
Is this a review of the Veracruz or the Outlook? If you're going to put the Veracruz's base price in a review of a completely loaded Outlook at least state that the Outlook also bases at $27,000 and has very similar specs.
Just a vote for some honest journalism here.
Hardy @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:46PM
16.9 MPG seems pretty decent to me for a 5000 lb vehicle.
oldsmoboi @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:47PM
"At a price of $39,105 as tested, the Outlook isn't cheap but it's good looking transport for up to eight. Having said that, the new Hyundai Veracruz is similarly powered with at least 600 lbs less mass to haul around, and a price tag that starts at just over $27,000. And Hyundai has an amazing warranty and great quality ratings."
Is this a review of the Veracruz or the Outlook? If you're going to put the Veracruz's base price in a review of a completely loaded Outlook at least state that the Outlook also bases at $27,000 and has very similar specs.
Just a vote for some honest journalism here.
Dave T. @ Jun 22nd 2007 3:49PM
in upper level trims the Outlook is actually less than the Veracruz. The Veracruz just has a lower point of entry. That's not really a fair comparison, matching your fully loaded AWD test Outlook XR to the base FWD Veracruz..