
Larger and more powerful than the model it replaces, Mitsubishi has aimed its Outlander at bigger game. Where last year's model had Subaru dead in its sights, the 2007 model is taking on Toyota's RAV-4 and Honda's CR-V.
So what makes the Outlander shoppable against those two best-sellers? They're about equal on options and pricing, but the Toyota is less fun even with its V6 option, and the four-cylinder Honda doesn't even offer a third row seat, no matter how useless those extra seats are in these smallish CUVs.
The Outlander's looks have moved away from the "toughwagon" genre dominated by the aforementioned Subies towards the sporty mini-ute segment. Its side windows are tall, but the rear-leaning back window adds a look of speed. The standard roof rack, while practical, also improves the Outlander's looks with a bit of shine on top. A roof spoiler and 18" wheels help accentuate the car's sporty intentions.

On the XLS model we had, keyless entry lets you leave the fob in your pocket or purse. Place your hand on either of the front door handles, and the car magically unlocks. A push of the small, rubber-covered button on the handle locks it. At first this option might seem a bit frivolous and gadgety, but the first time you have a sleeping baby in one arm and a grocery bag in the other, you'll be thankful for the expense. We just wish the rear door handles were touch-sensitive, as well. In the sleeping-baby scenario, you first must open a front door, then open the back – still easier than fishing for the keys, but the process could be a bit improved.
The Outlander's interior is both a strong and weak point, mixing near-luxury touches with cheapness. The soft leather seats were supportive and comfortable, but the dashboard, door panels and interior door handles felt cheap and flimsy. The small, shallow storage bin above the controls is a nice touch, but we wonder how long its plastic cover will hold up. In fact, our tester's was already warping a little, possibly due to the hot southern sun. Cupholders are lined with sound-deadening rubber, but it's permanently in place and can't be removed for easier cleaning. Overall, however, it's a nice looking place to spend a few miles. The black leather contrasts well with the metallic trim throughout the cabin. The wife and I agreed, however, it could have been a bit more matte. At some angles, the sunlight glinting off dash pieces on either side of the steering could almost blind the driver. Give the kids some sand paper, and it's no longer a problem.
The driver scores a nice beefy, leather-wrapped steering wheel and two gorgeous metal paddle shifters to control the 6-speed Sportronic transmission. Audio and cruise control buttons are right there on the spokes, as is the Bluetooth handsfree button, which we'll get to in a bit. Maintenance information as well as odometer and mileage estimates are displayed on an LED screen between the speedo and tach, while the automatic climate-control worked as advertised.



Back seat passengers get decent leg room, especially since front passengers may not need to push their chairs all the way back. Two up front and three in the back make five, but with the third-seat option, the Outlander could carry seven passengers. Just make sure you call dibs on the first five seats, because those two in the way back are best described as rudimentary. Through a six-step process, the mesh-covered metal frame springs from the rear cargo area ready to torture, uh, seat your most unlucky of passengers. It most closely resembles an Army surplus cot with headrests and seatbelts, but with less padding. It's not comfortable at all for adults and definitely not humane, but you have to admire the ingenuity. Get this option if you occasionally carry two extra small children, but skip it otherwise.

In-car gadgets can either be a help or a hindrance, but we found the Outlander's navigation system a big plus. It relies on a touch screen instead of a bunch of buttons and knobs, which makes its use much safer and easier. The same screen is used for the entertainment system as well as the car's security and lighting preferences.Satellite radio is standard on the XLS model and comes with six months of free service. Push a button and the touch-screen pivots up to reveal the CD slot. With the optional 30gb in-dash hard drive, just stick in a CD, and the car automatically adds all the tracks to your in-dash jukebox, complete with song titles. It's not a quick process, but it's usually done by the time the CD finishes playing. Use the touch screen to organize or delete tracks and leave your iPod in the house if you'd like. DVDs can also be played on the LCD screen. An auxiliary jack resides behind the touch screen next to the CD slot, but even if we had figured out how to get it to work, we're not sure how often we'd use it. Like we said, the only way to access the jack is to flip up the touch screen, which is also how you access the audio controls. With the jack exposed, the screen is facing straight up, and not visible to anyone – definitely not convenient.
The handsfree Bluetooth option, on the other hand, was very simple to use. Turn your mobile phone's Bluetooth on, follow the manual's instructions and your car and phone are synced. To make a call, push the phone button on the left wheel spoke, and tell the car who you're calling. With no other conversations in the car, the voice recognition system works flawlessly. With a babbling 1-year-old in the back seat, you'll call several different area codes before reaching the right number. Your best bet is to wait until the young'uns fall asleep to make your calls.Putting that toddler in the back requires little effort. The child safety seat installed very easily in the center position using the LATCH system. Getting him in and out was easy too, thanks to the Outlander's wide rear-passenger opening and tall doors.


Cargo room is plentiful, with plenty of space left after accepting a stroller. Without the Fosgate sound system, the rear loses the metal-grated subwoofer and gains a little more space. Accessing the cargo area is also improved with the car's novel tailgate. After opening the upper rear hatch, release a latch on the lower part and a small tailgate drops down, which is great for sliding cargo out or for football tailgating.
Rear seat cupholders are recessed into the center armrest, which means with a child seat installed there, rear seat passengers will have to hold their drinks. It's a minor inconvenience, but one to consider. A taller friend of ours also complained that rear headroom was not to his liking.




All Outlander models come with Mitsubishi's 3.0L V6 bolted to the automaker's Sportronic manumatic. Our tester also got the all-wheel-drive option, which made for a very sweet setup. In daily traffic, the SUV was smooth riding, smooth shifting, but ready to jump to immediate action if needed. Highway miles were nothing different. While many manumatics require the driver to first choose that mode with the center shifter before using, the the Sportronic only needs a bump of either paddle to drop from automatic to semi-manual. Holding the upshift paddle for a couple of seconds returns the car to fully automatic. At first we had only praise for this feature, as it really came in handy a couple of times when quick merges were called for. But then we discovered the downside. We know it's wrong, but occasionally, only for a second or two, we need both hands off the steering wheel. That means a moment of knee-driving, which, in the Outlander, kept triggering the manumatic mode. We admit, it could be what cures us of this bad habit, but it's pretty disconcerting to drop into fourth gear on the Interstate.
Mitsubishi also gives drivers choices with its all-wheel-drive system. A selector on the center console toggles between 2WD, automatic AWD and locked 4WD, where most of the power is sent to the rear wheels but the fronts also contribute some pull. To be honest, in normal driving, we didn't see much difference. My wife said if she had to choose, the 2WD option would be her preference. Supposedly the 2WD option gives better fuel economy in normal driving, but we didn't have the car long enough to really judge.
We put 350 miles on our Outlander over a week's time, burning about 20 gallons of regular unleaded. Most of those were highway miles with the air conditioner running in the stifling southern heat. With my lead foot, we saw an average of about 18 mpg, just under the EPA's estimated 19 mpg. Not too bad, but not as good as estimates for the four-cylinder CR-V or even the V6 RAV-4.Mitsubishi's 5-year/60,000 mile bumper-to-bumper and 10-year/100,000 mile powertrain warranties should cover any worries you might have about initial quality problems. It's difficult for us to comment on the Outlander's long-term reliability since it was just re-designed.
When all is said and done, we really liked the Outlander. Its attractive design, comfortable if somewhat cheap interior, cool gadgets and smooth ride combined with a fairly powerful and relatively economical engine to make it a candidate for any young family. If we can trim some of those more expensive options ($1,800 for nav, $1,500 for the Rockford Fosgate package), we can take our tester's sticker down from $30,615 to somewhere in the $28k range and closer to our budget. This family is adding it to its semi-finalists, and we suggest other family-car shoppers at least give it a look.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
bmoredlj @ Jun 11th 2007 1:03PM
While overall a very attractive little wagon, I prefer it's clone, the Peugeot 4007's face - it's far more wild and extroverted than the Mitsu's plain-jane countenance. But the tailgate is awesome.
rob @ Jun 11th 2007 1:09PM
while the rav4 aint that pretty looking, it gets better mileage and has a great v6 engine. it also handles really really well (especially with awd). so how is the outlander "more fun"? have you even tested a rav4?
judd @ Jun 11th 2007 2:28PM
I would have to agree with rob. I don't think 18 = 24 in the mpg game + more power. With the difference being so small for a RAV-4 Sport vs the XLS, I think I would go with the RAV-4 on this comparo. Around $26,500 OTD for a RAV-4 Sport (2wd) with sunroof, 6 disc, towing prep, roof rack etc. I'll skip the leather and shift paddles. That belongs in a sports car anyway. :-)
judd @ Jun 11th 2007 2:37PM
I would have to agree with rob on this one. 18 vs. 24 mpg is just too big a difference + more power from a RAV-4 V6. I would take a RAV-4 over this one.
Atomicbri @ Jun 11th 2007 9:04PM
Nope...rav-4 is a no-go here in NYC where I live... it has that HUGE door that opens and if you live in a land of parallel parking, you know you will NEVER get anything out of the back. The split back on the Outlander seems more practical for city life.
kostya @ Jun 11th 2007 1:25PM
Actually I agree with Autoblog about Outlander being more fun than the Rav4, this Outlander didn't win the The Good Design Award (awarded by Japanese engineering association) for nothing. Overall the chassis is better balanced, better weight distribution, aluminum roof (for lower center of gravity), and you can see where more fun comes in.
As far as gas mileage goes, real world numbers of Rav4 and Outlander are not that much different either. The only thing Rav4 has over the Outlander is more HP but that gets bettered by Mitsus better chassis design and weight distribution, and historically Mitsubishi has one of the best 4WD systems in the world (at its price range, I would say its more sophisticated than Rav4s).
This new Outlander has been outselling the new Rav4 and the new CR-V in Japan for a year now, people there actually go for well designed vehicles and don't just look at the brand names.
Atomicbri @ Jun 11th 2007 9:06PM
I agree, people here are blinded. I looked at this at the NYC Auto show and it definitely stood out among the competition. It was very accessible, lots of cool options and to me looks better that the other two mentioned competitors.
Jon @ Jun 11th 2007 1:29PM
Yo home dogg, dis is uh grate lookin car, gotta rumember duh sound off duh mah homies bout dis one!
JB @ Jun 11th 2007 2:35PM
I like the Outlander just because it isn't a Toyota, which I see everywhere. Mitsu needs to market itself as the anti-Toyota, a car people want because it's different, and also good though.
I looked at the base model and the GLS at the DC auto show and kinda liked the base model better. It was also very attractively priced since it has the same V6 and FWD which is fine for me. I can always add Sirius later, though that display screen is very nice with song info, etc.
I don't like the Rav4's swing door as it has to be considered wherever you park. No pull-thrus at parking lots or you risk not being able to open the hatch when someone parks behind you, for example. The split tailgate thing is nice. I do wonder about repairs, but most cars don't have the survivability of the old bumper-basher models of the 80s anyway. If you get hit really hard, it will probably be totaled out anyway.
I like this Outlander. It looks crisp and clean, should age well. Less is more in a lot of cases in car design.
MikeW @ Jun 11th 2007 3:27PM
None of them have four wheel drive. There is no center differential.
Both are clutch pack systems.
They are basically identical, except that the mitsubishi may have different underdrive/overdrive ratios so that it can claim to be 'rear biased'
But that just means the clutch will automatically disengage by itself at a lower speed.
Weight distributions, they are virtually identical, the mitsu is probably 1% more rear heavy, but is also about 100lbs heavier.
At least mitsubishi doesn't use the HID low beams as their DRLs.
judd @ Jun 11th 2007 3:32PM
sorry for the double post there.
Steve B. @ Jun 11th 2007 3:56PM
What's up with the mileage comments?
Outlander 2WD: 20/27, 4WD: 19/26
RAV4 2WD: 22/29, 4WD 21/28
2mpg difference in EPA ratings.
That's a around $300-350 difference per year in gas dollars. At that small a difference, features like the split tailgate, longer warranty, and paddle shifter would interest me more. On the downside, my wife used to have a Mitsubishi Eclipse, and it was an oil burning, gremlin-infested nightmare that would make the British look good!
Brian W @ Jun 11th 2007 8:26PM
People are looking at the combined mileage, just shows how stupid people are. They buy everything Toyota feeds them, just wait till the new mileage standards come out and see how off Toyota's are. Plus you have to buy the AWD Toyota if you don't like torque steer.
abang @ Jun 11th 2007 4:20PM
I was planning on getting a RAV-4 V6 last year when I was car shopping. However, they were popular and hard to come by and selling for close to sticker price. I test drove the 07 Outlander XLS and it was no contest. It was available immediately, offered at $500 below invoice and looked much better than the RAV 4. I hate that spare tire hanging on the back of the RAV4's single door tailgate.
I've had the Outlander for 6 months now. In that time, it has developed some minor squeaks but mileage is now in the low to mid 20s (mixed driving, 2WD most of the time). I hate the cheap interior but I am pleased with the overall package, the keyless entry, split tailgate, switchable 2WD/AWD and bluetooth. Plus, there are hardly any to be seen on the road so it's nice to be driving something that stands out among the many the many CR-Vs and RAV4s. Of course, I imagine Mitsubishi would like to see more of their Outlanders on the road. :)
Based on my experience so far, if I totalled my Outlander today, I'd buy another one without a 2nd thought. The standard features on the XLS trim is just too compelling to consider anything else. Once you've had keyless entry and integrated bluetooth, it's hard to give that up.
Don @ Jun 11th 2007 7:30PM
Even though you hate the interior?
Kwesi @ Jun 11th 2007 4:22PM
QUOTE::I like the Outlander just because it isn't a Toyota, which I see everywhere. Mitsu needs to market itself as the anti-Toyota, a car people want because it's different, and also good though.: END QUOTE#7
i agree to some extent. the thing is, even though this is what we would prefer, it isnt really good business.
what i think mitsu should do is offer a swb version, like what they do with the pajero in europe. that way they could offer 5 fully funcional seats, significantly better mileage and appaeal to a broader spectrum of shoppers
To #5...the outlander has been outselling every other in its class since its inception in 2005 (late). this is even more significant because the 'cute ute' segment was stagnating, and the outlander literally rekindled the flame,. doubling the rav4's and nissan xtrail's figures and trippling thr cr-v withinh only a few monthst being on the market (all three were either just launched or vigourously upgraded, as they (the crv) was about to be remodelled.
back to #7.i reaaly dont think 'anti-toyota' is a good marketing strategy, as toyota is know for reliability, fuel efficiancy and good resale value..the main things that sell cars. i think they should take ford's approach saying ' what good is great mileage with poor driving experience'...why not have them both?
the outlander is a really good vehicle ,.even the way underated 02-06 version. i think they need more configurations all across the lineup. at least now there brand is more focussed,..and i await the launch of the next galant,,,,because the competition is too fierce for even one more 'follower'. the galant needs some serious eye catcher, equipment and technology to make it stand out, because the aura, fusion, camry, accord and altima basically own the market.
all in all,.the outlander is a good vehicle, and i hope this is reflected more in its sales,..and in the entire Mitsubishi lineup for hat matter
anapoli @ Jun 11th 2007 5:32PM
What we really need is the Evolander to get a release...
mehugtree @ Jun 11th 2007 6:00PM
good looking ride. I just wish the trend towards "bigger is better" hadn't caught up with this one as well. I always admired the previous iteration for it's nearly perfect size (IMHO, of course)
Jason @ Jun 11th 2007 6:15PM
The Outlander is selling horribly in Los Angeles. I am not sure why, perhaps it's the exterior or interior styling. It doesn't seem like a bad vehicle... but Mitsubishi's problems will not going away anytime soon.
Don @ Jun 11th 2007 7:31PM
Personally, I think the Outlander certainly exudes more character than either the RAV4 or the CRV.