Ford dominates J.D. Power and Associates 2007 Initial Quality Study

Hot on the heels of the 2007 Strategic Vision Total Quality Awards, J.D. Power and Associates has released its 2007 Initial Quality Study. You'll no doubt be hearing about how well Ford has done in this year's IQS, as J.D. Power reports the Blue Oval has garnered five top model segment awards, more than any other automaker. Those models include the Ford Mustang, Lincoln Mark LT, Lincoln MKZ, Mercury Milan and the Mazda MX-5.
Indeed, Ford did very well this year, with the Lincoln brand improving from 12th place to 3rd, Mercury from 17th to 8th and Ford jumping from 16th to 10th. We take umbrage, however, with J.D. Power choosing to include the Mazda MX-5 in Ford's list of segment leaders. Ford owns a controlling 33% stake in Mazda, but doesn't include the Japanese brand's sales among its own at the end of the month, and neither does the Japanese-built MX-5 share its plaform with any other Ford models. And, while rattling off how well each Ford brand ranked, J.D. Power doesn't mention that Mazda ranked 35th, second to last ahead of Land Rover, another Ford brand. Still, even without including the MX-5, Ford's four segment leaders is still more than any other automaker. Mercedes-Benz and Toyota each had three.
J.D. Power also gives out Assembly Plant Awards, and in a surprising twist of fate, Ford's Wixom assembly plant that shut its doors forever this past week became the first North American assembly plant to earn the Platinum Plant Quality award for producing vehicles with the fewest defects. We suppose that means 2007 Lincoln Town Car owners are in for some trouble-free times with their cars.
You can check out the complete rankings in the gallery below and read the official press release from J.D. Power and Associates after the jump.
[Source: J.D. Power & Associates]
PRESS RELEASE:
J.D. Power and Associates Reports:
Ford Motor Company Captures Most Awards in 2007 Initial Quality Study
Product Launches Create Quality Challenges for Manufacturers
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif.: 6 June 2007 - Ford Motor Company garners five top model segment awards-more than any other automobile corporation this year, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2007 Initial Quality StudySM (IQS) released today.
In the study, Ford Motor Company earns model segment awards for the Ford Mustang, Lincoln Mark LT, Lincoln MKZ, Mazda MX-5 Miata and Mercury Milan.
"The 2007 IQS results contain some encouraging and positive news for Ford Motor Company," said Neal Oddes, director of product research and analysis at J.D. Power and Associates. "Fourteen Ford Motor Company models place in the top three of their respective segments-an achievement unmatched by any other corporation this year-which is a testament to the improvement in quality for Ford Motor Company vehicle models and plants. In addition, their Lincoln nameplate, which receives two segment awards, improves considerably to rank third in 2007, from 12th in 2006."
The Initial Quality Study serves as the industry benchmark for new-vehicle quality measured at 90 days of ownership and captures problems experienced by owners in two distinct categories-quality of design and quality of production (defects and malfunctions). Over the past 20 years, the automotive industry has improved in quality at the rate of 6 percent per year on average-a 20-year improvement rate of more than 120 percent. In addition, the study has found that the automotive industry has reduced problem counts by 50 percent every 7 to 8 years.
The study finds that vehicle redesigns and product launches create quality challenges for manufacturers as they continue to develop and introduce new and advanced automotive technologies. On average, a vehicle redesign increases problem counts by 10 problems per 100 (PP100) vehicles.
"Ideally, manufacturers should aim to achieve high initial quality when launching a new model, since this builds a strong foundation for future years and can become a differentiating factor relative to the competition," said Oddes. "One year after launch, initial quality begins to improve by an average of 7 PP100. If a model launches with lower initial quality, it is more difficult for the manufacturer to keep pace with the competition over time."
2007 IQS Ranking Highlights
Mercedes-Benz and Toyota models capture three segment awards each. Toyota models that receive awards are the 4Runner, Sequoia and Tacoma. Mercedes-Benz models that earn awards are the E-Class, SL-Class, and the S-Class. The S-Class ties with the Audi A8 (total) for having the fewest quality problems in the industry, with just 72 problems per 100 vehicles.
"Mercedes-Benz shows dramatic improvement, particularly with its newly-redesigned S-Class, which improves 63 PP100," said Oddes. "Overall, Mercedes-Benz improves its nameplate rank by 20 positions-the greatest rank increase of any nameplate in the study. All Mercedes-Benz models in the study improved substantially, and the breadth and speed of these improvements demonstrates the Mercedes-Benz commitment to quality."
For the second consecutive year, Porsche tops the overall nameplate rankings, averaging 91 PP100. Following in the rankings are Lexus, Lincoln, Honda and Mercedes-Benz, respectively. Honda, with the fewest problems per 100 among non-premium brands, improves in the ranking to fourth from sixth since the 2006 study and earns awards with the Civic and CR-V. Among non-premium brands, Kia posts the largest improvement in ranking, moving from 24th in 2006 to 12th in 2007 and earning an award for the Kia Rio/Rio5 for the second year in a row.
The most improved nameplates in the study are Land Rover (increasing in initial quality by 34 PP100), Saab (improving by 30 PP100) and Mercedes-Benz (increasing by 28 PP100).
Other nameplates receiving model awards in 2007 include Chevrolet (Express and Silverado Classic HD), Lexus (RX350/RX400h) Pontiac (Grand Prix) and Porsche (Boxster).
Assembly Plant Awards
For the first time since 1999, a North American assembly plant receives the Platinum Plant Quality Award for producing vehicles yielding the fewest defects. Ford Motor Company's Wixom assembly plant in Michigan, which produced the Lincoln Town Car, averages just 35 PP100. Plant awards are based solely on defect counts.
Among other North and South American plants, the General Motors Oshawa 2 plant in Ontario, Canada, which produces the Buick LaCrosse and Pontiac Grand Prix, receives the Silver Plant Quality Award. American Honda's East Liberty, Ohio, plant, which produces the Honda Civic Sedan and Honda Element, earns the Bronze Plant Quality Award.
In the Asia Pacific region, Toyota's Kyushu, Japan, plant, which produces the Lexus ES 350, Lexus IS 250/IS 350, Lexus RX 350, Lexus RX 400h and Toyota Highlander/Highlander Hybrid receives the Gold Plant Quality Award. Toyota's Fujimatsu, Japan, plant, which produces the Toyota Prius, earns the Silver Plant Quality Award. American Honda's Sayama, Japan, and Suzuka, Japan, plants tie for the Bronze Plant Quality Award. The Sayama plant produces the Acura RL, Acura TSX, Honda Accord Sedan/Hybrid Sedan and Honda CR-V. The Suzuka plant produces the Honda Civic Sedan/Hybrid Sedan, Fit and S2000.
BMW's Regensburg, Germany, plant, which produces the BMW 3-Series Coupe and 3-Series Sedan, receives the Gold Plant Quality Award for Europe. Earning the Silver Quality Plant Award is the Mercedes-Benz Sindelfingen, Germany, plant, which produces the Mercedes-Benz C-Class, CL-Class, CLS-Class, E-Class Sedan, E-Class Wagon, and S-Class. Audi's Neckarsulm, Germany, plant, which produces the Audi A6 Avant, A6 Sedan, A8 Sedan, RS 4 Sedan, S6 Sedan and S8 Sedan, receives the Bronze Plant Quality Award.
The 2007 Initial Quality Study is based on responses from more than 97,000 purchasers and lessees of new 2007 model-year cars and trucks surveyed after 90 days of ownership. The study is based on a 228-question battery designed to provide manufacturers with information to facilitate problem determination and drive product improvement.
Find more detailed findings on new-vehicle quality performance as well as model photos and specs by watching a video, reading an article and reviewing quality ratings at JDPower.com.
About J.D. Power and Associates
Headquartered in Westlake Village, Calif., J.D. Power and Associates is an ISO 9001-registered global marketing information services firm operating in key business sectors including market research, forecasting, performance improvement, training and customer satisfaction. The firm's quality and satisfaction measurements are based on responses from millions of consumers annually. For more information on car reviews and ratings, car insurance, health insurance, cell phone ratings, and more, please visit jdpower.com. J.D. Power and Associates is a business unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies.
About The McGraw-Hill Companies
Founded in 1888, The McGraw-Hill Companies is a leading global information services provider meeting worldwide needs in the financial services, education and business information markets through leading brands such as Standard & Poor's, McGraw-Hill Education, BusinessWeek and J.D. Power and Associates. The Corporation has more than 290 offices in 40 countries. Sales in 2006 were $6.3 billion. Additional information is available at http://www.mcgraw-hill.com.












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
3cubedminus3squared 4:07PM (6/06/2007)
More great news for Ford :)
Glad to say there are four Fords at my house and only one has had a problem. [the heater core wnet out on the escort,going to Mexico probably did it]
Keep th good news coming!
Reply
starlightmica 8:24PM (6/06/2007)
And bringing up the rear are Ford subsidiaries Mazda, which fell flat on its @$$, and Land Rover, which continues in last place.
Reply
gerard 4:14PM (6/06/2007)
Is it just me or is JD Powers a joke? didn't the sonata win the highest initial quality a few years back? ha ha and to see MB Jaguar toyota hyundai and kia up there beating subaru and others.. It seems the more money you bribe JD powers with the higher up on the graph you go
Reply
bmoredlj 4:13PM (6/06/2007)
Very odd that a closed factory gets the highest award, especially when the Lincoln Town Car is a primative machine that has barely changed since 1998. I suppose if you keep producing virtually the same exact product for years on end, you'll eventually get it right. Maybe Chevy should still be making 9-year old Impalas.
Reply
Carl Odom 11:39PM (6/06/2007)
Let us pray that the rich Ford heirs aren't forced into getting a real job. If so, perhaps one of the thousands of entrepreneurs Ford has screwed will take pity on them and offer them something.
We've been twice-screwed, but never again.
Tim 4:14PM (6/06/2007)
Excellent.... (in Mr. Burns fashion)
Reply
Brad Kempeny 4:18PM (6/06/2007)
Hmmm... lets see the anti-american crowd spin this bit-o-good news. Let me try- Lincoln only improved to third pft. that still means two manufacturers did better. Lincoln and Ford need to vastly improve their quality- third is not really that good.
Reply
rob 4:31PM (6/06/2007)
why dont you just revel in the good news of the results instead of inviting trouble...you don't know when to stop talking
Tanster 4:17PM (6/06/2007)
So the Mazda MX-5 can help Ford get the top spots but MAZDA's overall bottom of the barrel rating doesn't bring Ford down? makes a lot of sense.
Good for Ford though- pretty suprised Honda improved as well since everyone on AutBlog has been lumping Honda together with Toyota with regards to declining quality.
Reply
Jay Evans 4:22PM (6/06/2007)
Since the survey only records responses from those people who received one, bothered to fill it out and then actually sent it back, it's about as useful as an internet political poll. (or opinions from an internet forum)
Reply
Tool 4:21PM (6/06/2007)
After seeing this years results, you can't tell me that Toyota hasn't grown too quickly and its vaunted quality isn't suffering as a result.
In the past, Toyota/Lexus absolutely dominated IQS. Not so anymore.
Reply
Deezee 4:22PM (6/06/2007)
Go Ford.
Reply
Vinny 4:28PM (6/06/2007)
Now, how many of you were here earlier dumping on JD Powers reports in your comments because your beloved big 3 were getting their butts kicked by the orient brands? I remember comments like, "JDP reports are BS". Does this report all of the sudden have credibility again?
I've always trusted the report and trust this one just as much. Even though I'm not a consumer of the big 3's products (and this report won't get me in the sales lot) I am glad to see some of my country's cars get on the top of a list that's reporting "good" news.
Any of you big 3 loyalists out there NOT trust this report?
Reply
Jay Evans 4:35PM (6/06/2007)
"I've always trusted the report and trust this one just as much."
Really? Mazda ranked 35 in US, they ranked 8th in the UK (2007) and 3rd in Germany (2006) in their JD Powers surveys. Same cars...hmmmmmmmm
Jeff 4:30PM (6/06/2007)
I dont want initial quality. I want 7 years old quality. I dont think Ford would be up their after 7 years.
Yes they are making great products now. Yes the Edge may get up there. Fusion too. But right now in 2007 half of Fords products are still old school. You cant paint the whole company with one brush.
Reply
Vinny 4:30PM (6/06/2007)
Jay Evans:
What is your suggestion for a more accurate method of data collection? Is there a better one?
Reply
Gunderson 4:56PM (6/06/2007)
Vinny,
My accurate way of collecting data is to not ask consumers. Do the whole testing yourself in house. Like consumer reports does. Or car magazines like longterm car and driver or motor trend.
There are a lot of consumers that bitch and complain then there are those that so want to be positive they overlook things.
My wife's brother is a die hard Dodge Ram fan. He bought one with a Hemi in 2004. The truck has had numerous problems and gets very poor milage. But he is fine with it and stands up for it.
Then there is my wife's mother. After years of domestics bought a Toyota Matrix last year. She treats the Toyota so poorly and expects so much from it. She seems to have this anger that she wants the toyota to breakdown so she can say "here look the damn Jap car sucks". She just complained her wipers were squeeking last week. I mean come on. The Matrix has been awesome, but she doesn't want to love it.
SobeSVT 4:48PM (6/06/2007)
Tanster, the study refers to Ford as a brand not as a car company. All you see listed there are brands, therefore the MX-5's impresive first pace in its cathegory had no impact in Ford's no less impressive 10 place overall. #10 place is not Ford Motor Company its Ford vehicles, the fact that Lincoln was in #3, Jaguar in #6 and Mercury in #8 should have been a clue.
Jeff, your logic based in an arbitrary assumption is kind of flawed, don't you think?
http://www.fomoconews.com
Reply
Don 4:47PM (6/06/2007)
Muahahahahahahah!
That's my diabolical "Take that Toyota!" laugh.
Reply
Jay Evans 4:49PM (6/06/2007)
If I knew that I could put Powers out of Business.
But let's look at the figures.
97,000 surveys returned
36 Manufactures x number of models = ?
But we can guess that many cars or companies were ranked on only a couple of hundred returns at the most.
I would bet that many people who were very happy with their cars just threw the survey in trash.
Reply