Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
Paris Preview: Officially Official, Honda's new hybrid is the Insight!
Mazda Kiyora city car concept, MX-5 facelift head to Paris
Leaked: Official updated Mazda MX-5 image
Reader Spy: Chevy Volt caught on set of Transformers 2
Spy Shot: Production interior of Chevy Volt (maybe)
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Jaguar XF Supercharged
By the Numbers - August 2008: New Digs Edition
In the Autoblog Garage: KITT Shelby GT500 KR
First Drive: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Nissan Murano
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadTop 10 cities in which NOT to speed
(Page 1 of 1)
G.PeterinCA @ May 30th 2007 1:15PM
This has become a real sore spot with me. Someone driving slightly over the speed limit is not a hazard to the public safety, but they are a great source of revenue for government agencies. I have been in law enforcement for many, many, many years and when I started it was not in the best interest to cite everyone for speeding. Too many tickets written meant a trip to the supervisor for a lecture. Now government can sell anything to the community as long as they can 1) induce fear and 2) make them believe it is a benefit to the public safety. Why raise taxes when you can get more revenue by writing traffic tickets?