Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
CAR reveals spy shots of McLaren P11 supercar
2010 Chevrolet Camaro priced: LS $22,995, SS $30,995
BREAKING: GM and Chrysler talking about merger
Spy Shots: Nissan 370Z again, with interior shots
2010 Mazda3 unveiled ahead of LA Auto Show
In the Autobog Garage: 2009 Chevy Cobalt SS Turbo
Knight Rider: The Liveblog -- Season 1, Episode 3
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Mazda RX-8 R3, return of the "hummer"
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Chevy Corvette Z06
Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadHide under the covers: ROUSH Nitemare unveiled
(Page 1 of 1)
Andrew @ May 23rd 2007 8:18PM
"I would rather have 450hp from 4.6 engine than 450hp from the 5.4 engine."
Wouldn't it be the other way around? You are having less % of the flywheel HP lost from a larger engine than the smaller. I drive a S/C 4 cyl and 1-3rd gear is torque crazy and would surprise you, while the top end isn't as impressive.
jgp @ May 24th 2007 4:28AM
Andrew,
The 4.6 engine would be much lighter than the 5.4, more than making up for it by increasing power-weight ratio.