Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
2010 Chevrolet Camaro revealed!
Spy Shots: Honda's hybrid Prius-fighter caught
Best shot yet of the Transformers 2 mystery Vette
Spy Shots: Subaru WRX STI spec C
In The Autoblog Garage: 2008 Mercedes SLK55 AMG
First Drive: 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8 w/VIDEO![In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Ford Flex Limited [w/VIDEO]](http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/ford-flex45015_thumbnail.jpg)
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Ford Flex Limited [w/VIDEO]
First Drive: 2009 Mazda6
Should've bought a Garmin? Testing the iPhone 3G's GPS capabilities
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
David @ May 22nd 2007 4:50PM
This truck needs a decent engine. Untill then its an also ran to me. FJ is better for the money.
How they designed a new jeep that got a lot heavier then they threw in a minivan 3.8 engine from 20 years ago is beyond me. Should have kept the 4.0 at a minimum. 0-60 in 11.6 seconds? comon. And I know its meant for slow offorading, but it has no power for that either.
Autoblog just showed a aftermarket firm putting 6.1 hemis in them easily. How come they can put a 6.1 Hemi but Jeep cant put the 3.7 or 4.7 or the 5.7 in it atleast?
Very dissapointed.