Filed under: Concept Cars, Convertibles, Chevrolet, GM
Autoblog drives the Camaro Convertible Concept [NEW PICS]
click above image to view 52 new high-res pics of the Camaro Convertible Concept
Two days last week, Autoblog got to spend time with the Hugger Orange hued Camaro Convertible Concept that GM brought out to California, along with a few of its designers. In case you didn't realize it already, the car is stunning. GM Designer Tom Peters, though, was looking for a special, brutal kind of stunning: the brief for the Camaro Concept was "The meanest, scrappiest streetfighting dog, the meanest looking thing on the road." When he was describing that to Autoblog last weekend, at dinner, he actually growled.
Follow the jump for the full story, and check out our new gallery of 52 high-res images, a few of which you're not going to find anywhere else.
[Photos: Jim Fets]
Gallery: Chevy Camaro Convertible Concept
click on any image to view the full high-res gallery

In addition to Tom Peters, Autoblog spoke to Brian Smith, lead exterior designer, and Micah Jones, lead interior designer. The first thing you'll want to know about this car, according to Smith and Jones: 90% of what you see will be on the production car. Whew.
And to hear Smith tell it, that is just reward for the "serious but fun" process that it took to get the Camaro Concept finished. The design team included American, Russian, Korean, and French designers -- all of whom knew the import of the original Camaro. When GM's Advanced Design Studio (ADS) in California was given the brief for the Camaro, they actually based their first sketches off the Gen 2 Camaro, produced from about 1970 to 1973. Then it was decided by the men in charge that not only did they need to use the first generation Camaro, they needed to use the 1969 model specifically. Smith said "It was more challenging than to use the Gen 2 car. The Gen 1 was harder to make 21st century. A lot of the muscle cars around that time looked similar, and it was easy to slide into enemy territory." He mentioned the time he looked at a designer's sketch and thought he saw something familiar. "I said 'It looks like a Javelin.' And the designer said 'Yeah, I had one.' So he had to redo it."
It's harder to bring forth heritage without overtly copying than it is to do an entirely new car. Add to that challenge the weekly meetings with Bob Lutz and Ed Welburn (VP, Global Design), who probably offered constant commentary since GM needed to get the car right. In the cycle of meeting, redesign, meeting, redesign, Smith said that at one point the car was too retro. When they finally did get a design they were happy with and were ready to cast the show car model, everything was stopped: it was decided that there should be some fresh eyes put on it. The Advanced Design Studio had two models of the car done, so they gave one to GM's basement studio in Detroit, called Studio X, to do an alternate version. Tom Peters ran the show there, and one of the designers he called on at Studio X was Sing Yup Lee, who did the original profile sketch that the Z06 is based on. They had one month to get the car ready.
Peters knew he wanted the baddest car on the block, as well as the '69 monoslot grill, which has a faster profile than the front of the car, a telltale sign of the '69. At the ADS, in the heat of the competition, the bigwigs stepped back and waited to see what would emerge, and Smith said "it really came together once we could just sit down and get to it. The competition and new eyes at Studio X made the car new." The result is what you see. Well, minus a top -- the convertible has had work done in the tonneau area, but it doesn't have a roof yet.
How does it look in the flesh? Really, really hot. It's wide and low (but not too low), with wheels out at the corners that make it look long. The expanse of metal -- highlighted by that Hugger Orange -- makes it look like there's Camaro everywhere. However, it isn't much bigger than a '69 -- one inch longer, two inches wider. You'll feel the menace when you get close to it. When it was still sitting in the trailer, in the dark, you could just make out the back of it, it was like just being able to see the outlines of a monster at the bottom of a well. The grill, jutting out like a cowcatcher, makes the headlights appear even more deep set, and with the hoodline squaring their tops... the car looks like it wishes you would just get out of the &*$#@! way. Even in orange.
Inside, the car is disturbingly nice. There was close integration with interior and exterior design teams, who really worked together on the tonneau cover and rear shelf area. It's gorgeous (have we said that enough yet?) True, it's a concept, so it's supposed to be nice, but again, Micah Jones said most of what you see in the pictures will remain. It's basic in its layout, with two round dials put in rectangular holes -- another '69 feature -- and additional gauges on the floor at the end of the central tunnel. The car is also really roomy. We're sure the lack of a top added to the sensation of roominess, but it really did feel like we could raise a family in there. And the gearshift is the kind of thing that would fit Predator perfectly -- a giant polished knob at the end of a kinked strut. The steering wheel is cool, too -- but that won't make it. It needs an airbag. Under the hood, the engine is "a jewel in a setting," branded and polished, emphasizing the aesthetics. Even the extraneous wiring is hidden. But don't expect it to be so pretty in the production car.
How does it drive? Well, we only got it up to thirty-five per hour, but we have no complaints. It looks awesome, sounds awesome, feels awesome. Both Smith and Jones have said they are fighting to keep the production car true to the concept. Even better, they alluded to modifications that they say "could make the car even better." Everyone we talked to also spoke of working with the accessories department and promising great aftermarket stuff. The coupe arrives in 2009, the convertible "within a year after that."
We say enough said. We'll take it. In black. With tinted windows and black wheels. Convertible or coupe, doesn't matter. Either way is how you spell "badass."

























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Zain 2:43AM (5/15/2007)
Nice preview, as always! Keep it up!
Reply
akgrown 3:05AM (5/15/2007)
The entire car looks fantastic, but that engine bay is STUNNING. GM made this? Really??? ;)
Reply
Bryan 3:56AM (5/15/2007)
Oh my god, those guages!! I never thought I could be so excited about something so minor, and yes I know we will never see them in production :(
Reply
SilverAero 4:04AM (5/15/2007)
Who ever is driving that thing should be smileing way more than currently is.
Reply
bgdc 4:06AM (5/15/2007)
wow, that's an awful looking car. It'll fit right in alongside mustangs and chargers at the local trailer park.
Reply
stefan 5:11AM (5/15/2007)
That thing belongs in 1969 not 09.
Reply
motorman 6:19AM (5/15/2007)
with all the libs pushing global warming be caused by "greehouse" gasses and "W" being forced to issue a executive order to the EPA,the supreme court ruling that the EPA is responsible for the rules to cut back on the gasses you will be lucky to see this car with a V-6 engine let alone the LS-7. this means new "CAFE" rules
Reply
... 6:28AM (5/15/2007)
stunning? gorgeous? That thing is downright ugly. Come to think of it, I haven't seen a good looking car for a while...
Reply
chris 6:55AM (5/15/2007)
Mmmm, don't know where all this ugly stuff is coming from. I normally hate American cars, not because they're American, just because of how bad and ugly the cars are 99% of the time. This thing however, looks great. Much, much better than the coupe, especially in a good colour instead of that boring silver all the time. Also much better than both the Corvette and Mustang, which are two of the girliest cars I've ever seen in convertible form, and both drive quite poorly from what I've read and seen. But since Holden are responsible for a lot of what's under the skin of this Camaro and not Chevrolet, this car could turn out to be pretty damn good.
Reply
JasonSK 7:01AM (5/15/2007)
They are just posers, couldnt afford it anyways so they are trashing it.
Reply
Raj Aryan 7:32AM (5/15/2007)
One word: WOW! This is what American OEMs need to compete. I will buy this over Lamborghini! This is what I called a Modern and Truly American Car. This must make it to production AS IS (or at least 90% of it). This makes Mustang and Charger look milder. If GM continues to make cars like these, it will blow Japanese out of the water. They (and Ford too) have to make concept like cars for real world, if they want to survice another 100 years.(otherwise most of what GM offers today is pefectly boring vehicles)
Reply
John R 7:37AM (5/15/2007)
I also wonder if this is really a Monaro in disguise. I know the Camaro's underpinings in the Bayformers movie is the Monaro, but it was my understanding that a fair amount of the new car was going to be...new
Reply
Raj Aryan 7:38AM (5/15/2007)
BTW, great job by photographer, it's not easy to capture the beauty like this!!
And whoever got to drive this, I hate you from the bottom of my heart!
Reply
Owain Ozymandias Buck 7:51AM (5/15/2007)
Not bad, but let's see the hard top. Convertibles ARE for girls! Or poseurs anyway.
The "cool" console gauges suck. They were a bad idea in the original Camaro, and they really need to go. Offer a $600 package with a different dash and console gauges for the old farts who want to relive their youth. The Camaro of my youth--while being pretty lame in the power department and a bit too flexible--at least had all the gauges where you could glance at them while moving.
Oh what's the use. By the time I can pick up one of these used, gas will be too expensive to run the thing...
At least it smacks around the Mustang in the looks department. No doubt it will smack it around on the street too! ;)
Reply
chris 7:53AM (5/15/2007)
Are you implying that this car will be based off the previous Monaro John R? This car has nothing to do with the Monaro that the US got as the GTO, this is a totally new car being made that will end up getting an Australian Monaro body, with proper adult 2+2 seating, in addition to being the new Camaro. The old Monaro was based off a decade old Opel platform, the new one, just like with the new Camaro, is based off the Zeta platform developed for the latest Holden Commodore, which isn't even a year old yet.
Reply
sammy z 8:31AM (5/15/2007)
a lottttttttttt of stuff on that car won't make production.
Reply
brimg87 8:47AM (5/15/2007)
Wow, that thing is stunning. Everything from the body, interior and even the engine bay are clean and downright gorgeous. I think this goes beyond simply "retro", to me it actually looks futuristic with classic roots. I'm so proud of GM lately; just wish this was going to be available sooner.
Reply
mr.ed 8:51AM (5/15/2007)
The whole IP is a redo of an earlier, unreadable one from the 60's. It has to go. The shock tower brace appears to be attached to the cowl with sheet metal screws. An obvious concept that will take lots of work to go into production.
Reply
Barney 9:15AM (5/15/2007)
Like akgrown, I too am stunned over the quality in the engine compartment. It's these fine touches that signal quality. Let's hope GM follows through.
Reply
Tim 9:20AM (5/15/2007)
Kudos for the coverage guys, but I fail to see the point of driving a concept.
This is really more GM's fault, since you guys are just going to check out this cool car, but it has virtually no relationship whatsoever to the production Camaro. They might as well have let you drive a golf cart in hugger orange. Sure, it has a V8, and the styling is very similar, but this car is hand built on a chopped Solstice chassis. Other than the engine, it bears little resemblance, mechanically, to the real car.
And yes, I know what I'm talking about, as I actually worked on early aspects of the production Camaro at a supplier.
Reply